Obama gave Epstein immunity from prosecution

Says every legitimate source on the Planet Earth.
You don't get to quote everyone, Wally. Omniscience fallacy.
Obama took the Oath of Office on January 20th, 2009.
He never took an oath of office, but he was inaugurated on that day, yes.
He was not President in 2008. The election happened on November 4th, 2008, so he was not even President-Elect on September 18th, 2008.

If we cannot even agree on when Obama was President, there is no debate possible here.
JPP does not have debates. It only has conversations, if that.
 
They knew he was going to win, it was a slam dunk. They also were in favor of his winning, knowing what he was and would do. You're just an idiot, Walt. Guess who controlled their funding, moron? Your red herrings are just silly. DEmocrats controlled both houses. And, Robert Mueller was head of the FBI. lol

AI Overview


In 2008, the Democratic Party controlled the 110th Congress, which ran from January 3, 2007, to January 3, 2009, during the last two years of President George W. Bush's term
. Key Democratic figures included Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

Leadership and party balance

In 2008, Democrats held majorities in both chambers of Congress:

  • House of Representatives: Democrats had a majority with 233 members, compared to 202 Republicans.
  • Senate: Democrats held an operational majority with 49 members. They were joined by two independent senators who caucused with them, giving the party an effective majority. The official leader was Harry Reid, with Dick Durbin as the Majority Whip.
Bush Jr was a RINO. It was even worse with Jeb.
 
trump has never gotten a majority of the popular vote, and you tell us that many of the people who voted for him are Democrats with fake affiliations... So he less popular than we think?

Keep struggling Walt; the more lies you post, the more irrelevant you faggots and commies become. You're even losing the racist black and latino vote now.
 
Keep struggling Walt; the more lies you post, the more irrelevant you faggots and commies become. You're even losing the racist black and latino vote now.
According to you, trump is even getting the "racist black and latino vote", but he still cannot get a majority of the popular vote? That is just sad.
 
Over half of America is in recession. That has got to effect the next election.
It not a recession yet, it soon will be.

Then there's the discrepancy in what average Americans pay in taxes and what the billionaires pay.

A glance at America’s economic landscape in 2025 shows one constant headline: billionaires’ riches dwarf the incomes of nearly everyone else. The 902 billionaires in the U.S. alone now control $16.1 trillion, an amount greater than the GDP of every other country, except China, per fortune report. Critics argue that this concentration of wealth is amplified by a tax system allowing some of the richest people on Earth to pay less, as a percentage, than teachers and nurses.

So, what if billionaires paid taxes at the same effective rate as the upper-middle class? ChatGPT offered the below bold predictions, while Brian Kofford, certified public accountant (CPA) weighed in on the feasibility, fairness and economic reality of such a move.

ChatGPT calculated that if nearly one thousand billionaires paid at a 20% rate, matching many upper-middle-class earners, the U.S. might net “hundreds of billions in annual revenue,” potentially up to $200 billion a year. Oxfam’s estimate supports this idea, projecting that even a modest 3% wealth tax on the ten richest would raise $52 billion annually. These figures are compelling, especially as Congress considers the eye-watering costs of climate initiatives and education reform...


...Could a new billionaire tax level the playing field? ChatGPT believes so, arguing new revenue could fund universal pre-K, expand Medicare and jumpstart climate investment. “It could increase trust in the tax system, showing that the wealthiest aren’t playing by a different set of rules,” the AI chatbot wrote. Still, the top 1% would hold enormous influence, Oxfam puts it at 43% of the world’s assets.

Kofford isn’t convinced tax hikes alone would fix inequality. “Billionaires didn’t just save harder, they built scalable businesses and assets that compound,” he explained. “Education, entrepreneurship access and smarter financial literacy for the middle class play a bigger role than simply raising someone else’s rate.”

.
 
Over half of America is in recession. That has got to effect the next election.

It will. Prices keep rising as well. The good thing for the MAGATs right now is the govt. shutdown. They're not reporting economic indicators like unemployment, inflation, etc. But we can see inflation in real time when we go to buy groceries, clothes, electronics, etc.

The markets freaked out last Friday when TACO said he was going to inflict "100% tariffs" on China. They've since somewhat recovered, investors having realized that he's full of shit and will TACO before they're implemented. Working folks' 401(k)s sure took a hit.
 
Back
Top