Treason = impeachment and visa versa, the topic of this thread. You opined the SCOTUS would determine Presidential activity outside the Constitution which implied possible charges of treasonous behavior generally don't groan at all but I reserve the right to repay the little gifts left for me. It's the right thing to do, isn't it?
Ohio Auditor Dave Yost, who introduced Romney at the event, blasted Obama and his family for the cost of their vacations.
"March of 2010 the first lady and her daughter spent spring break in New York City. This was, by the way, doesn’t include the date night. Anybody fly to New York just to have a date night with your spouse? No, I didn’t think so. It goes on and on," he said.
"We’ve got 17 vacations here, including the million and a half dollars spent for their Christmas 2011 vacation. Mr. President, that’s not middle class, and you stop lecturing us about our lives!”
http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns...attendee-accuses-obama-of-treason-122686.html
He lacks a spine, fortitude, whatever you wish to call it.
Some cliam Obamacare is activity outside the constitution of the US, you ass.....try to keep up.....
activity outside the Constitution implies nothing other than exactly what the words mean as read together....have someone help you.....
You 'groan' because you're too dumb to write an intelligent response.....and especially because what I say is factually true and correct.....I do the repaying, as in.....
I didn't start it.
AND......Treason IS NOT EQUAL TO impeachment and visa versa...not by any stretch.....
The SCOTUS will determine very soon if Obama is trying to operate outside the structure of our Constitution...
Romney has no obligation to defend Obama or to render his own verdict one way or another and is right not to do so......
Poor Pathetic AssWipes.....how stupid....
I wasn't privy to the arguments presented to the Justices in the SC so I can't relate what the evidence/arguments were......
Operating outside the Constitution is not necessarily or automatically treason.....treason has certain particular requirements that most laypeople don't know.....
and would not understand in one of two lines....especially you, being the AssWipe fool you are.....
.Do you see the words "treasonous or impeachable action" in my post anywhere......?
Don't advertise your ignorance with stupid claims and lies that are so easily disproved.....
Its amazing that the pinheads that can't counter a post I make will invariably give me a groan instead of an intelligent response....
Ya just gotta love it........
He lacks a spine, fortitude, whatever you wish to call it.
Obama? Yes, Obama most certainly lacks a spine, fortitude... Mr. I vote present/lead from behind... that is who gets your vote? Wait for Johnson to enter... then vote for a real candidate. Neither of these two is going to help.
He lacks a spine, fortitude, whatever you wish to call it.
The Obama campaign was quick to cast the incident as a sign that Romney lacks “fortitude.”
“Today we saw Mitt Romney’s version of leadership: standing by silently as his chief surrogate attacked the president’s family at the event and another supporter alleged that the president should be tried for treason,” campaign spokeswoman Lis Smith said in a statement.
The Romney campaign called foul, pointing to a 2011 Labor Day rally in which Teamsters president Jimmy Hoffa used foul language to refer to Republicans and said Democrats should take them out. Obama later took the stage and made no mention of the comment.
Asked later if the president should have disavowed the remark, White House adviser Dan Pfeiffer said the president shouldn't be expected to "serve as the speech police for the Democratic Party."
No she meant Romney. Because a woman in his audience accused the President of the United States of treason and Romney stood there with a stupid grin on his face.
I guess you can't read very well.
The Obama campaign was quick to cast the incident as a sign that Romney lacks “fortitude.”
“Today we saw Mitt Romney’s version of leadership: standing by silently as his chief surrogate attacked the president’s family at the event and another supporter alleged that the president should be tried for treason,” campaign spokeswoman Lis Smith said in a statement.
The Romney campaign called foul, pointing to a 2011 Labor Day rally in which Teamsters president Jimmy Hoffa used foul language to refer to Republicans and said Democrats should take them out. Obama later took the stage and made no mention of the comment.
Asked later if the president should have disavowed the remark, White House adviser Dan Pfeiffer said the president shouldn't be expected to "serve as the speech police for the Democratic Party."
oh, I can read quite well... can you...
guess not...
Well I don't know what he called R's, but if it was stupid pigfuckers, then what's the problem?
Sorry, but the President deserves some respect and since the R base has none for this President, when they start calling him a Muslim, and a terrorist, and saying he has committed treason, if Romney can't open his mouth, it says a lot about him.
I assume you know the difference between the Presidency and generic "republicans" or "democrats".
The point is, the Obama admin clearly has a double standard. I assume you also know the difference between some random woman in the audience and Jimmy Hoffa, Big Union rep. If they are not going to police people that say stupid things at their events, then why should they expect Romney to do otherwise?
hmm...
The point is, the Obama admin clearly has a double standard. I assume you also know the difference between some random woman in the audience and Jimmy Hoffa, Big Union rep. If they are not going to police people that say stupid things at their events, then why should they expect Romney to do otherwise?
They are talking about the President of the United States, who by the way, is not a terrorist and has not committed treason. It's really simple. Even John McCain managed to open his mouth to one of his nutters.
They probably have told Romney, do not talk off script, you blow it every time. Besides, if he calls Obama's action treasonous, he could be accused of treason, it was after all, his healthcare plan that the government used as a blueprint for Obamacare.