Anti-Party
Tea Is The New Kool-Aid
We are opening up to "non-white + non-male"
Obama CAN NOT Negotiate During A Closed Government............Period *FACT!*
- Thread starter Anti-Party
- Start date
We are opening up to "non-white + non-male"
Anti-Party
Tea Is The New Kool-Aid
So you think that Women, Infants and Children should not allow children to survive if a dad shouldn't have to "hang around"
I'm not sure where the phrace "Right To Choice" came from but it certainly didn't come from Fathers not doing their job as parents..........
Anti-Party
Tea Is The New Kool-Aid
"End WIC" <----"I Love America"
Men have the right to leave when they create a baby but the women are allowed to feed the abandoned baby "Oh wait, this just in, ILA and other idiots don't know a thing about politics and want to control your life. They don't want babies to eat, so shut it down.
Man, how deep do you have your Pinocchio nose shoved up Obamas ass? You give stupid a bad name.
Anti-thinker is at it again; with the memory of a lemming, he pretends that these shutdowns have never happened before, that they are not a result of this idiot President and his head idiot Reid to pass a budget or that it represents a massive failure of leadership which Obama has never shown or ever will show.
It's official, you're a brain dead partisan dipshit.
It isn't dipshit. Most Government workers are still on the job and if not for the partisan efforts of this butt clown President, whose ass you kiss daily, and his minnieme buffoon in the Senate, funding important functions would occur.
But he is counting on brain dead gullible fools like you to fall for thus childish partisan ass hattery and give him election victories in 2014. He's counting on you anti-thinker. With any luck, he wont fart on that brown nose you have so far up his ass.
Dimwit.
Why the fuck do pretend you're not a brain dead leftist?
You just make up crap as you go don't you? A person needs hip waders to keep up with your retarded bullshit.
Another incredibly dimwitted response from the forums dimwit briggade.
Why do you think that every loser in America is entitled to every one else's money? If dimwits like you and the DNC didn't spend so much time celebrating and making excuses for losers, we would have fewer of them.
If we had a President that knew what he was doing we wouldn't be wallowing in the economic malaise that is creating ever greater pressure on the welfare state.
But you're a leftist dimwit; who could expect you to actually think?
Another dimwitted claim; who forced these brain dead women to spread their legs for loser men? Oh that's right; NO ONE.
I am amused by the dimwitted leftist belief that society should be responsible for idiots who typically vote Democrat engaging in reckless irresponsible behavior. Does a dullard like you know what you get with such stupid policies; even MORE losers acting irresponsibly and recklessly knowing that dipshits on the left are there to empower such behavior.
Dimwit.
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
Your premise is that the only way they eat is through gobblement. I reject your premise.
Do you think your tired old "ILA hates babies" routine is going to work? Seriously? That is all you have?
You started with crack addicted parents then moved to deadbeat dads. Mighty fine view you have of the American people.
Here is a thought. Why don't you just help these people yourself voluntarily? Why not cut the middleman? Why do you outsource your compassion?
Whether it is wrong or not, shouldn't an individual have the right to not to want to help the less fortunate? Or should the be forced to share your conscience?
Taft2016
Verified User
If "the Right" keeps allowing Obama to keep raising the debt ceiling, it is directly stating "it's ok to run the government without a Congressionally approved budget that had time to be negotiated every year since he took office," directly "ok'ing" running the country without a budget.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
what was his excuse for not negotiating BEFORE the government was shut down?.......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
have you noticed that you look smarter when you don't post?.........
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
apparently another difference between the right and the left is that the left doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about......we adopt because we want to have children......its as simple as that......and I would love to learn what fantasy you have from which you draw your "data" on rape and abuse?......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
the ocean....
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
we shouldn't take their kids away from them if they still vote Democrat.....
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
The unsettled healthcare law
Law or not, expect a long battle ahead, with the 2014 congressional races key to deciding whether Obamacare survives.
October 6, 2013
Ever since Obamacare's stormy passage in early 2010, Democrats have been waiting anxiously for the program to go into effect and hoping that a dose of reality would calm the partisan battles over the health insurance plan. Once everything was up and running, they hoped, skeptical Americans would see that Obamacare was a good idea all along — and reward the party that brought it to them.
That's looking unlikely, at least in the short run. Last week's glitch-filled rollout of Obamacare's health exchange websites, combined with Republicans' furious refusal to accept the program as what President Obama calls "settled law," confirmed something political strategists in both parties had already predicted: The war over Obamacare is far from over.
"It's unlikely that the Affordable Care Act will be widely popular until people have real experience with it — until it becomes the new normal," a leading Democratic strategist told me. "We're talking about years, not weeks or months."
Nobody expected the launch of a fleet of balky websites to make an immediate difference to perceptions of the health insurance plan, not even with endorsements from icons like Lady Gaga, who managed to get the main website address wrong in her promotional tweet.
Still, the opening-day problems and the slow pace of applications for health insurance were not encouraging signs.
More important, in the long run, was the Republican Party's reaffirmation — spurred by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and other tea party legislators — that repealing, defunding or dismantling the program remains one of its top goals.
The tea party caucus has succeeded in making resistance to Obamacare a litmus test for Republicans, and as a result, it's likely that next year's congressional election will be fought in large part over the health insurance program. The fate of Obamacare may hang in the balance.
"The 2014 election will be the Gettysburg of this struggle — the deciding battle, one way or the other," predicted Robert J. Blendon of Harvard's School of Public Health.
In the current Congress, the Senate's Democratic majority has stopped the Republican-led House of Representatives from defunding or delaying Obamacare's implementation. But if Republicans take control of the Senate next year — a prospect currently rated as a tossup — only Obama's veto will stand in their way.
And even by election day in 2016, Obamacare may still be a work in progress.
"If you give it three, four, five years, every experience we have is that public support will be there," Blendon said. "But you have to give it that much time." Meanwhile, Republicans will have every incentive to attack the program's shortcomings.
"The real problem here is not managerial; many programs take years to roll out," he said. "The real issue is political. Programs don't do well if one party doesn't support it and public opinion isn't for it."
As for Obamacare, public opinion has settled into skepticism. A Fox News poll released last week, after the websites' rollout, found that 54% of voters favor repealing all or part of the law, while 41% want to preserve or expand it — not much different from earlier findings.
The poll found that only 30% of voters want to repeal the entire law — but among Republicans, that number swells to 53%, and among tea party supporters, 71%. That helps explain GOP legislators' opposition.
What could change public attitudes? "There could be movement either way, depending on whether people think the program turns out better or worse than they expected," Blendon said. If more employers drop retirees and spouses from insurance coverage because Obamacare is available, for example, "you could see a huge backlash," he said.
Republicans may have a built-in advantage in that debate: They can blame any bad news about healthcare on Obamacare, whether the program is at fault or not.
"If rates are going up, Republicans will say that's because of Obamacare, even though it's not true," said Mark Mellman, a Democratic pollster. "If companies are cutting back, Republicans will say that's because of Obamacare."
But it will also matter what remedy Republicans propose. In last week's Fox News poll, most voters said they opposed defunding Obamacare — although two-thirds of GOP voters said they supported the idea.
A one-year delay in implementing Obamacare, on the other hand, is a broadly popular idea, supported by 57% of all voters, including 80% of Republicans.
So don't expect the war over Obamacare to be over any time soon. Instead, expect Republicans of every stripe to continue their guerrilla campaign against the program through the 2014 congressional election, and perhaps the 2016 presidential election as well.
Expect more furious, partisan debate over every step of implementation, with dueling experts from each side.
Expect smart Republicans to focus on demands to delay or cancel the penalties on individuals for failing to sign up, the law's least popular provision. That might sound like a minor change, but it could undermine the program fatally.
The president will continue to insist that Obamacare is "settled law." But a law is only fully settled once both parties accept its permanence, and Obamacare is a long way from there.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/comm...affordable-care-act-20131006,0,5425437.column
I believed that republicans did have a good chance at winning the Senate .. I no longer believe that.
Shutdown could diminish GOP hopes of winning Senate
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/...enate-republicans-gop-house-house-republicans
Law or not, expect a long battle ahead, with the 2014 congressional races key to deciding whether Obamacare survives.
October 6, 2013
Ever since Obamacare's stormy passage in early 2010, Democrats have been waiting anxiously for the program to go into effect and hoping that a dose of reality would calm the partisan battles over the health insurance plan. Once everything was up and running, they hoped, skeptical Americans would see that Obamacare was a good idea all along — and reward the party that brought it to them.
That's looking unlikely, at least in the short run. Last week's glitch-filled rollout of Obamacare's health exchange websites, combined with Republicans' furious refusal to accept the program as what President Obama calls "settled law," confirmed something political strategists in both parties had already predicted: The war over Obamacare is far from over.
"It's unlikely that the Affordable Care Act will be widely popular until people have real experience with it — until it becomes the new normal," a leading Democratic strategist told me. "We're talking about years, not weeks or months."
Nobody expected the launch of a fleet of balky websites to make an immediate difference to perceptions of the health insurance plan, not even with endorsements from icons like Lady Gaga, who managed to get the main website address wrong in her promotional tweet.
Still, the opening-day problems and the slow pace of applications for health insurance were not encouraging signs.
More important, in the long run, was the Republican Party's reaffirmation — spurred by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and other tea party legislators — that repealing, defunding or dismantling the program remains one of its top goals.
The tea party caucus has succeeded in making resistance to Obamacare a litmus test for Republicans, and as a result, it's likely that next year's congressional election will be fought in large part over the health insurance program. The fate of Obamacare may hang in the balance.
"The 2014 election will be the Gettysburg of this struggle — the deciding battle, one way or the other," predicted Robert J. Blendon of Harvard's School of Public Health.
In the current Congress, the Senate's Democratic majority has stopped the Republican-led House of Representatives from defunding or delaying Obamacare's implementation. But if Republicans take control of the Senate next year — a prospect currently rated as a tossup — only Obama's veto will stand in their way.
And even by election day in 2016, Obamacare may still be a work in progress.
"If you give it three, four, five years, every experience we have is that public support will be there," Blendon said. "But you have to give it that much time." Meanwhile, Republicans will have every incentive to attack the program's shortcomings.
"The real problem here is not managerial; many programs take years to roll out," he said. "The real issue is political. Programs don't do well if one party doesn't support it and public opinion isn't for it."
As for Obamacare, public opinion has settled into skepticism. A Fox News poll released last week, after the websites' rollout, found that 54% of voters favor repealing all or part of the law, while 41% want to preserve or expand it — not much different from earlier findings.
The poll found that only 30% of voters want to repeal the entire law — but among Republicans, that number swells to 53%, and among tea party supporters, 71%. That helps explain GOP legislators' opposition.
What could change public attitudes? "There could be movement either way, depending on whether people think the program turns out better or worse than they expected," Blendon said. If more employers drop retirees and spouses from insurance coverage because Obamacare is available, for example, "you could see a huge backlash," he said.
Republicans may have a built-in advantage in that debate: They can blame any bad news about healthcare on Obamacare, whether the program is at fault or not.
"If rates are going up, Republicans will say that's because of Obamacare, even though it's not true," said Mark Mellman, a Democratic pollster. "If companies are cutting back, Republicans will say that's because of Obamacare."
But it will also matter what remedy Republicans propose. In last week's Fox News poll, most voters said they opposed defunding Obamacare — although two-thirds of GOP voters said they supported the idea.
A one-year delay in implementing Obamacare, on the other hand, is a broadly popular idea, supported by 57% of all voters, including 80% of Republicans.
So don't expect the war over Obamacare to be over any time soon. Instead, expect Republicans of every stripe to continue their guerrilla campaign against the program through the 2014 congressional election, and perhaps the 2016 presidential election as well.
Expect more furious, partisan debate over every step of implementation, with dueling experts from each side.
Expect smart Republicans to focus on demands to delay or cancel the penalties on individuals for failing to sign up, the law's least popular provision. That might sound like a minor change, but it could undermine the program fatally.
The president will continue to insist that Obamacare is "settled law." But a law is only fully settled once both parties accept its permanence, and Obamacare is a long way from there.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/comm...affordable-care-act-20131006,0,5425437.column
I believed that republicans did have a good chance at winning the Senate .. I no longer believe that.
Shutdown could diminish GOP hopes of winning Senate
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/...enate-republicans-gop-house-house-republicans
Anti-Party
Tea Is The New Kool-Aid
Then why does the Right keep refusing to appoint a budget negotiator? Because they don't want to pass a budget.