obama calls woman limburger calls slut

Quakers are pacifists. They do not believe in war. Yet they pay taxes that go to funding our national defense. How are we NOT violating their first amendment rights, but not allowing religious organizations to opt of of contraceptive health care violates the first amendment?

We do not force them to fight in war- they may be excused because of their religious convictions. The Constitution grants our government the right to collect taxes for defense. Our Constitution does not grant the government the same authority to force religious institutions to pay for insurance to provide birth control. Indeed it protects said religious organizations from just that sort of authority.
 
Impotence is a medical condition that only relates to sexual activity. You are splitting hairs. Men want viagra so they can get hard enough to penetrate a woman's vagina. Viagra= sexual activity. Now you are playing dumb.

Regardless of your desperate attempt to make them equal, they are not. Impotence IS a medical condition sex is not. I'd say the simpleton is you.
 
We do not force them to fight in war- they may be excused because of their religious convictions. The Constitution grants our government the right to collect taxes for defense. Our Constitution does not grant the government the same authority to force religious institutions to pay for insurance to provide birth control. Indeed it protects said religious organizations from just that sort of authority.

What a dopey response. No one is forcing anyone to have sex, either.
 
Sorry - I didn't realize that Sat. morning was the weekly get together for "Hairsplitter's Anonymous".

Carry on....
 
Pretending impotence is not an actual medical condition as opposed to sex, takes a special kind of stupidity. Of course considering the group doing so it also requires a special kind hypocrisy.

Yeah, a medical condition that prevents a man from having intercourse, moron. Why else would a man need an erection, if not to have sex?

erectile dysfunction (Also called impotence.) - the inability to achieve an erection, and/or dissatisfaction with the size, rigidity, and/or duration of erections.

 
Yeah, a medical condition that prevents a man from having intercourse, moron. Why else would a man need an erection, if not to have sex?

erectile dysfunction (Also called impotence.) - the inability to achieve an erection, and/or dissatisfaction with the size, rigidity, and/or duration of erections.


A woman getting breast augmentation after cancer treatment does not "need" breasts any more then a man "needs" an erection- though both conditions can be medically argued... The only moron here are those who try to pretend a medical condition is equal to having sex.
 
A woman getting breast augmentation after cancer treatment does not "need" breasts any more then a man "needs" an erection- though both conditions can be medically argued... The only moron here are those who try to pretend a medical condition is equal to having sex.

Get over yourself, idiot. Nobody's pretending that any or every medical condition is equal to having sex, just the medical condition that results in erectile dysfunction. Your analogy is phony. Breast augmentation after cancer has nothing to do with contraception, which is the point being argued.
 
Get over yourself, idiot. Nobody's pretending that any or every medical condition is equal to having sex, just the medical condition that results in erectile dysfunction. Your analogy is phony. Breast augmentation after cancer has nothing to do with contraception, which is the point being argued.

How the hell does she know what a woman needs after having her breast removed due to cancer? How heartless can one get? I seriously hope no one close to her has breast cancer, I can only imagine how unsupportive she would be.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top