Oath keepers pleads guilty for 6th

Prosecutors struggle with consistent story in Jan. 6 cases



BOSTON (AP) — There’s little doubt the Oath Keepers were planning for something on Jan. 6. The question at the heart of the criminal case against its members and associates in the attack on the U.S. Capitol is: What, exactly, did they intend to do?


Authorities suggested for weeks in court hearings and papers that members of the far-right militia group plotted their attack in advance in an effort to block the peaceful transition of power. But prosecutors have since said it is not clear whether the group was targeting the Capitol before Jan. 6.


“The plan was to unlawfully stop the certification of the Electoral College vote ... and the plan was to be prepared to use violence if necessary,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Kathryn Rakoczy said during a hearing this month. But the Oath Keepers “did not know precisely the way in which force and violence might be needed to support this plan,” she said.

But as the sprawling investigation has unfolded, prosecutors have sometimes struggled to maintain a consistent narrative and had to walk back statements made in court hearings or in papers. It has created an opening for defense attorneys to try to sow doubt in the case.

“The government presented a theory (without evidence) that there was a weeks long plan to invade the Capitol,” an attorney for one of the Oath Keepers, Jessica Watkins, wrote in a recent court filing. “There was no such plan.”

In one case, prosecutors declared in court documents in January there was “strong evidence” the pro-Trump mob aimed to “capture and assassinate elected officials." The Justice Department quickly clarified it had no such evidence, blaming it on a miscommunication between prosecutors.

After she was pressed by a judge in a recent hearing, Rakoczy conceded authorities “do not have at this point someone explicitly saying, ‘our plan is to force entry into the Capitol in order to stop the certification,’” but cautioned that the investigation is ongoing.



https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...?ocid=msedgntp

images



:laugh:








ERROR IS ALL YOUR LINK PROVIDES
 
That’s a pretty good size sentence, I bet the other defendants are shitting in their pants right about now.
 
The oath keepers are done

Every member will be in prison or scrambling to convince the FBI that they don’t believe any of this crap anymore and are quiting


They will pack up their lives and scramble into the sewer where they belong


They won’t wait for the boot

Scatter and regroup is a common result. Only those who committed crimes will be charged and face conviction.
 
And the others will be watched for being part of a criminal organization

It's not a crime to belong to the Oath Keepers, Proud Boys or Boogaloo Bois just like it's not a crime to belong to the Black Panthers, SDS or AntiFa.
 
https://www.counterextremism.com/content/white-supremacy-groups-united-states



* In an October 2020 assessment by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf declared that white supremacist violent extremists “have been exceptionally lethal in their abhorrent, targeted attacks in recent years.”* In March 2021, Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas declared domestic violent extremism “poses the most lethal and persistent terrorism-related threat to the homeland today.”
 
Back
Top