NY Times, Wall St. Journal Admit ‘Global Immigration Backlash’

[Earl]

NY Times, Wall St. Journal Admit ‘Global Immigration Backlash’

NY Times, Wall St. Journal Admit ‘Global Immigration Backlash’

Record-breaking mass migration into the United States, Europe, and Australia is causing a “Global Immigration Backlash” against establishment left-wing political parties, admits a New York Times columnist.

“In earlier eras, the political left in the U.S. included many figures who worried about the effects of large-scale immigration,” a New York Times columnist admitted on July 11, adding: Of course, mass immigration means lower wages for the working class.

https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2...st-journal-admit-global-immigration-backlash/

 

[Earl]

“In earlier eras, the political left in the U.S. included many figures who worried about the effects of large-scale immigration,” a New York Times columnist admitted on July 11, adding:

Both labor leaders and civil-rights leaders, for example, argued for moderate levels of immigration to protect the interests of [home nation’s] vulnerable workers … [but] many progressives are uncomfortable with any immigration-skeptical argument. They have become passionate advocates of more migration and global integration, arguing — correctly — that immigrants usually benefit by moving from a lower-wage country to a higher-wage country.

“The global migration wave of the 21st century has little precedent,” said columnist David Leonhardt, adding that “Lower-income and blue-collar workers often worry that their wages will decline because employers suddenly have a larger, cheaper [imported] labor pool from which to hire.”

 

[Earl]

Of course, mass immigration means lower wages for the working class.

Of course.