NY Times losing subscribers because of Brett Stephenson

cawacko

cawacko

Well-known member
So I though the NYT gained a bunch of subcribers after Trump became president. But now they've hired Brett Stephenson from the WSJ whose first column was about climate change and has readers totally triggered. Now people are waiting on hold to cancel their subscriptions. Stephenson doesn't deny climate change is real or that man contributes to it but that's not enough I guess. This topic is religion to some folks and unless you tout the party line you are a heretic who needs to be shut up.


https://www.google.com/amp/twitchy....-as-punishment-for-climate-change-heresy/amp/
 
cawacko said:
So I though the NYT gained a bunch of subcribers after Trump became president. But now they've hired Brett Stephenson from the WSJ whose first column was about climate change and has readers totally triggered. Now people are waiting on hold to cancel their subscriptions. Stephenson doesn't deny climate change is real or that man contributes to it but that's not enough I guess. This topic is religion to some folks and unless you tout the party line you are a heretic who needs to be shut up.


https://www.google.com/amp/twitchy....-as-punishment-for-climate-change-heresy/amp/
Click to expand...

The NY Times is already out of business, they just do not know it yet
 
Chlorate said:
These subscribers should all do their part to reduce man-made climate change.
Click to expand...

No way these liberal hypocrites would abandon their super polluting first world lifestyles and embrace an all natural subsistence living way of life.

They use the Al Gorian myth as way to pat themselves on the back, knowing damn well it has nothing to do with saving the planet, but is simply a mechanism for them to assuage their massive egos.
 
Althea said:
Yea...I think there were 7 cancellations. At least, there were 7 tweets claiming so. NYT subscriptions are through the roof since the election, but they don't mention that they've been offering great deals on new subscriptions.

I don't think they're too worried about a handful of subscriptions
Click to expand...

I find more interesting the angst of these scientists and the demand that a voice they oppose be silenced.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top