NY Times claims it's 'long been known' WHOOPS

Poor Richard Saunders said:
ROFLMAO. False claim on your part.
What evidence do you have of a discussion of business stuff. The testimony to Congress this week was they didn't discuss business stuff.
Click to expand...

I don't need direct evidence to surmise what was being discussed. What do you think say, the head of some Chinese corporation Joke supposedly never met before and was taking a phone call from only because his son called him and asked Joke to talk to the guy, and they spent say 20 minutes on the phone? What would they talk about in those 20 minutes? Why get Joke involved in a phone call at all if he wasn't part of anything going on with such a person?

It is you that is being either oblivious or disingenuous, or both.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Not at all. I am saying that the standard in the US for proving criminal guilt is beyond a reasonable doubt. Evidence can not be assumed. It must actually exist. What evidence do you have that Joe talked with Hunter about his work with Burisma?
Click to expand...

what evidence beyond a reasonable doubt was there against Kav?

Oh...thats right u didnt need any
 
Last edited:
evince said:
The weather


That is what was testified to


He would call his only living son to make sure he was Ok during this families time of DEEP LOSS

AND Hunter would have him say hi to whomever he was with at the time


A person who was there at the time of the calls said business WAS NEVER DISCUSSED


It was the exact witness republicans claimed would point to crimes


He didn’t


And if your Fucks start lying about this man and slandering him

He will take your fucking money in court for slander


Eat shit you brain dead foreign disinformation bot hole
Click to expand...

You are literally the most stupid person Ive ever run across
 
Last edited:
The death of their beloved family member and helping each other bare that emotional burden


You fucking sociopath
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top