NY Magazine article: The Uninhabitable Earth

I truly wish we could make protecting the environment a non-partisan issue.

Some right-wing think tanks are on board, at least. There are a whole host of reasons to transition to renewables & cleaner sources of energy, including national security and economic growth. I find that too many on the right don't think logically about it - they let their distaste for the left or their dislike of Gore guide their opinion much more than what's happening.

If you meant what you said, you idiots on the left wouldn't keep making it a political issue.
 
Just because one point dipped below the previous year suggests nothing in terms of a trend

I explained to you the significance of the term ANOMALY and suggested you look it up.

Then I pointed out to you that the trajectory of the temperature graph line is obviously on a steadily upward trend.

But on both issues you headed for the hills.
Yet when the temperature went up due to the largest El Nino in nearly twenty years the usual suspects were going apeshit about it. Now, of course, a code of Omerta has been imposed by them about it. You also said that you wouldn't listen to anything unless from NASA/NOAA, so here is what Wiki says about Roy Spencer.

Roy Warren Spencer (born December 20, 1955)[1] is a meteorologist,[2] a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, and the U.S. Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) on NASA's Aqua satellite.[3][4] He has served as senior scientist for climate studies at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.[3][4

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Spencer_(scientist)

Sent from my iPhone 25S with cherries on top
 
Sorry to spoil your climate porn, but there are microbes that consume the methane.
http://www.nature.com/ismej/journal/v9/n8/full/ismej201513a.html
I know you guys want to believe every frightening scenario, but you are just plain lazy. You have to try to be skeptical once in a while. Due diligence... Don't you like to be sure what you believe is correct? Don't you try to poke holes to see if it holds up to scrutiny? I suspect you do not.

So, who gave you the link to that article? Who set you up to believe that the methane problem is being solved by microbes? Who relied on your ignorance about the difference between carbon-rich and carbon-poor cryosols, and bet you wouldn't notice that the article has nothing whatsoever to do with the methane clathrate the OP's article talks about? Cough it up, tinfoil!
 
So, who gave you the link to that article? Who set you up to believe that the methane problem is being solved by microbes? Who relied on your ignorance about the difference between carbon-rich and carbon-poor cryosols, and bet you wouldn't notice that the article has nothing whatsoever to do with the methane clathrate the OP's article talks about? Cough it up, tinfoil!

Google search. That's all it took.
here's a link in your native tongue
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/29/arctic-methane-release_n_3671497.html
 
You post some random hysterical article from the NYT yet totally dismiss real evidence that global temps. have fallen below the El Nino high of last year. You said that you'd only believe evidence from NASA or NOAA, so when I pointed that Dr. Roy Spencer maintained the UAH dataset on behalf of NASA you headed for the hills.

Sent from my iPhone 25S with cherries on top

Maintaining a database doesn't mean squat.

Yet when the temperature went up due to the largest El Nino in nearly twenty years the usual suspects were going apeshit about it. Now, of course, a code of Omerta has been imposed by them about it. You also said that you wouldn't listen to anything unless from NASA/NOAA, so here is what Wiki says about Roy Spencer.

Roy Warren Spencer (born December 20, 1955)[1] is a meteorologist,[2] a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, and the U.S. Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) on NASA's Aqua satellite. He has served as senior scientist for climate studies at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.[3][4]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Spencer_(scientist)

Sent from my iPhone 25S with cherries on top

You are lying about what I said. I never said that I "...wouldn't listen to anything unless from NASA/NOAA". Not only that, you are misrepresenting the data. As I've explained to you several times... the report addresses a temperature ANOMALY. Try to remember to look up the definition of the word and maybe you won't be so confused about things.

Millie.
 
The planet is disposable. God himself will destroy this planet and the entire universe when he is ready.

Matthew 24:29
Immediately after the tribulation of those days: 'The sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from the sky, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken.'

Mark 13:25
The stars will fall from the sky, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken.'

2 Peter 3:10
But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar, the elements will be dissolved in the fire, and the earth and its works will not be found.

Revelation 6:12
And when I saw the Lamb open the sixth seal, there was a great earthquake, and the sun became black like sackcloth of goat hair, and the whole moon turned blood red,

Revelation 6:13
and the stars of the sky fell to the earth, like unripe figs dropping from a tree shaken by a great wind.

Revelation 6:14
The sky receded like a scroll being rolled up, and every mountain and island was moved from its place.

Revelation 20:11
Then I saw a great white throne and the One who sat on it. The earth and the heavens fled from His presence, and no place was found for them.

Revelation 21:1
Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and earth had passed away, and the sea was no more.

Matthew 24:35-3
Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will never pass away. No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. As it was in the days of Noah, so will it be at the coming of the Son of Man. For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark. And they were oblivious, until the flood came and swept them all away. So will be the coming of the Son of Man.

Luke 21:6
So keep watch at all times, and pray that you may have the strength to escape all that is about to happen and to stand before the Son of Man.

Matthew 24:42
Therefore keep watch, because you do not know the day on which your Lord will come.
"The Bible is the word of God"
"How can you be sure it's the word of God?"
"Because the Bible tells us so"
"Why believe the Bible?
"The Bible is infallible"
"How do you know it's infallible?"...

(Return to top)
 
Maintaining a database doesn't mean squat.



You are lying about what I said. I never said that I "...wouldn't listen to anything unless from NASA/NOAA". Not only that, you are misrepresenting the data. As I've explained to you several times... the report addresses a temperature ANOMALY. Try to remember to look up the definition of the word and maybe you won't be so confused about things.

Millie.
I know what an anomaly is, arsehole. I also know you're a dozy twat that just parrots the same old shit over and over.

Sent from iPhone 25S Turbo
 
Back
Top