Nunes Out

first blush it looks like an ethics charge ..it's some office that gets regular charges,,
As to the investigation -it's hopelessly partisan, but Gowdy runs a better Chair,,

I'm pretty sure the investigation will go ahead on the 2 tracks Russian collusion/Susan Rice

Yeah, the House Ethics Committee announced an investigation so stepping away was the proper thing to do.

On another note, it will be popcorn time if Susan Rice has to face Trey Gowdy, can't wait for that.
 
Yeah, the House Ethics Committee announced an investigation so stepping away was the proper thing to do.

On another note, it will be popcorn time if Susan Rice has to face Trey Gowdy, can't wait for that.

Rice would embarrass Gowdy, much like HRC did.
 
Good riddance, to bad rubbish!

grumpy-cat-dont-let-the-door-hit-you-in-the-ass-on-the-way-out.jpg
 
Comey rescued Hillary from the mishandling classified information charge. Not long after the Bill Clinton/AG meeting on the tarmac. There's a little circumstantial evidence for you.

You don't remember loving Comey before you hated him lol?

so meeting with someone you have known for just a few minutes is premiere evidence of collusion?


gee I wonder
if numerous campaign members meeting with Russians they NEVER met before might be an automatic conviction huh


hypocracunt
 
Breaking...

Apparently he was called out of his committee this morning by House higher-ups and fired. To be replaced by three Republicans, including Trey BENGHAZI BENGHAZI BENGHAZI!!!! Gowdy so this may or may not be a better situation.

Someone cue up the Queen music:

"And another one's gone and another one's gone - Another one bites the dust!"
 
Comey rescued Hillary from the mishandling classified information charge. Not long after the Bill Clinton/AG meeting on the tarmac. There's a little circumstantial evidence for you.

You don't remember loving Comey before you hated him lol?

It could be argued that Comey shared 33% of Hillary losing the election, along with 33% of the Russia claims, and 33% of Hillary's own botched campaign.
 
So, we're investigating Trump, but nobody knows why exactly. Do you know how insane that sounds?

At least with Susan Rice an actual law was broken. In fact, I don't know why Flynn doesn't file suit against the IC.

Susan Rice committed a crime, believe me, lol.

President Trump’s wild accusation and the right-wing media’s eagerness to support the claims of the Trump White House, working in cahoots with House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), that there was nefarious “unmasking” of Trump associates picked up in surveillance of Russian officials has proved to be a colossal flop. Nunes wound up discrediting himself and implicating White House staffers in a half-baked scheme to deflect attention from the president.

Right-wing outlets (from Fox News to Breitbart to the New York Post) took the bait from Nunes and his associates, dragging Susan Rice into the matter — without evidence of a crime. Indeed, no evidence of impropriety exists and no evidence ties Rice to the leaking of Michael T. Flynn’s name. Given that the White House does not want to release the documents shared with Nunes that allegedly provide the basis for its tale, we can surmise that Nunes really had no evidence of much of anything."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...-tear-down-the-system/?utm_term=.6ed6ea7bcf5e
 
^WaPo??
you might as well post Fake News

that there was nefarious “unmasking” of Trump associates picked up in surveillance of Russian officials has proved to be a colossal flop
there was an inordinate amount of unmasking,
and the pattern of the unmasking quickened as the election grew near,and afterwards.
Recall Rice is not an investigator either.

"Nefarious" is about the same as "collusion"=
 
^WaPo??
you might as well post Fake News

there was an inordinate amount of unmasking,
and the pattern of the unmasking quickened as the election grew near,and afterwards.
Recall Rice is not an investigator either.

"Nefarious" is about the same as "collusion"=

I trust trump mouthpieces like Breitbart, Townhall, Washington Times etc. as much as you trust the MSM.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/04/politics/who-is-susan-rice/

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/pol...g-accusations-i-leaked-nothing-nobody-n742486

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/the-rights-bizarre-susan-rice-crusade-w475022

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slat...vative_media_went_after_susan_rice_today.html
 
Hip Hip Hurray! Gowdy however is a hyper partisan who never could get any goods on HRC, though he tried desperately.


Lets hope he fails miserably at hiding the goods on Rump.

He is a failure as an investigator ... An incompetent of epic proportions ...
I expect him to fail at protecting Leningrad Don ...
At least he won't run to his great racist orange master with every tidbit of info...
 
So, we're investigating Trump, but nobody knows why exactly. Do you know how insane that sounds?

At least with Susan Rice an actual law was broken. In fact, I don't know why Flynn doesn't file suit against the IC.

Flynn, despite is best efforts to sell his soul, is going to prison...
Rice has no worries whatsoever...
 
Back
Top