Nuclear power issue

Taichiliberal said:
Translation: this dummy doesn't know and doesn't want to know...but he doesn't dare do any honest research, because that would require an HONEST OPINION BASED ON THE FACTS, and Southie DARE not do so for fear he will be open to criticism that will disprove his contentions.

I get tired of doing homework for willfully ignornant neocons, teabaggers, corporate ass kissers, birthers and bigots. As this thread shows, Southie just doesn't have the stones to even READ what is FREELY OFFERED.

He's done.
Click to expand...
I've done my research Libbie. You don't have the stones to challenge me. In fact you won't even make a point.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Translation: this dummy doesn't know and doesn't want to know...but he doesn't dare do any honest research, because that would require an HONEST OPINION BASED ON THE FACTS, and Southie DARE not do so for fear he will be open to criticism that will disprove his contentions.

I get tired of doing homework for willfully ignornant neocons, teabaggers, corporate ass kissers, birthers and bigots. As this thread shows, Southie just doesn't have the stones to even READ what is FREELY OFFERED.

He's done.
Click to expand...

Southern Man said:
I've done my research Libbie. You don't have the stones to challenge me. In fact you won't even make a point.
Click to expand...

Sorry jackass, the chronology of this thread tells a different story from the delusional tale you spin here. What's in print and what your addled brain perceives are two entirely different things.

Now, repeat the same old bullshit....buh-bye!
 
Taichiliberal said:
Sorry jackass, the chronology of this thread tells a different story from the delusional tale you spin here. What's in print and what your addled brain perceives are two entirely different things.

Now, repeat the same old bullshit....buh-bye!
Click to expand...

Actually it tells something very different. In the following post you linked to something yet never defined your point. What is it?

Taichiliberal said:
But while you're mulling over that, you might want to read through this

http://spectrum.ieee.org/energy/nuclear/nuclear-wasteland
Click to expand...

Again, I won't guess at what point you are trying to make. That's your job.
 
http://www.fox10tv.com/dpp/news/national/eleven-missing-after-oil-rig-explosion-

Eleven missing after oil rig explosion
Updated: Wednesday, 21 Apr 2010, 5:35 PM CDT
Published : Wednesday, 21 Apr 2010, 5:34 PM CDT

MOBILE, Alabama (WALA) - The search continues for 11 people who were on an oil drilling platform off the coast of Louisiana when it exploded sending up a wall of fire. The explosion sent six people to USA Medical Center in Mobile, Alabama, where one is being treated in the burn center.
This story hit close to home for Kathy Breland.* Her son Craig has worked on an oil rig for 13 years and had just returned to sea.
Breland said she was watching the news when she heard the news that made her heart stop.
"It happened about 10:00 last night," said Breland.
Craig Breland, 32, was working on the Transocean Deepwater Horizon when it burst into flames Wednesday night. The flames reported to be 200 feet tall.
"You know, my son is a type one diabetic, that has your concerns. So I got all my prayer warriors together and started praying for my son's safety," said Breland.
Breland said the power of prayer paid off. Her son Craig, a father or two, survived the fiery blast.
"So glad to know he is alive!" she said.
The United States Coast Guard said out of 126 people on the rig, 114 have been accounted for, and 11 are still missing. The rig is more than 50 miles southeast of Venice, on Louisiana's tip.
Lt. Scot Albrecht said it's a major operation.
"Thirty different air crews were involved in the search and rescue mission. Pretty massive effort for this base. Probably couple hundred just here," said Lt. Albrecht.
Breland's thoughts are with those who are still missing.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Okay, this makes TWO energy-related disasters since this thread was posted. I think we should turn this buffoon's thread into a running record of energy-related disasters for the next year or two, and continue to point out that not one single American has ever lost their life in the production of nuclear energy.
 
Dixie said:
http://www.fox10tv.com/dpp/news/national/eleven-missing-after-oil-rig-explosion-

Eleven missing after oil rig explosion
Updated: Wednesday, 21 Apr 2010, 5:35 PM CDT
Published : Wednesday, 21 Apr 2010, 5:34 PM CDT

MOBILE, Alabama (WALA) - The search continues for 11 people who were on an oil drilling platform off the coast of Louisiana when it exploded sending up a wall of fire. The explosion sent six people to USA Medical Center in Mobile, Alabama, where one is being treated in the burn center.
This story hit close to home for Kathy Breland.* Her son Craig has worked on an oil rig for 13 years and had just returned to sea.
Breland said she was watching the news when she heard the news that made her heart stop.
"It happened about 10:00 last night," said Breland.
Craig Breland, 32, was working on the Transocean Deepwater Horizon when it burst into flames Wednesday night. The flames reported to be 200 feet tall.
"You know, my son is a type one diabetic, that has your concerns. So I got all my prayer warriors together and started praying for my son's safety," said Breland.
Breland said the power of prayer paid off. Her son Craig, a father or two, survived the fiery blast.
"So glad to know he is alive!" she said.
The United States Coast Guard said out of 126 people on the rig, 114 have been accounted for, and 11 are still missing. The rig is more than 50 miles southeast of Venice, on Louisiana's tip.
Lt. Scot Albrecht said it's a major operation.
"Thirty different air crews were involved in the search and rescue mission. Pretty massive effort for this base. Probably couple hundred just here," said Lt. Albrecht.
Breland's thoughts are with those who are still missing.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Okay, this makes TWO energy-related disasters since this thread was posted. I think we should turn this buffoon's thread into a running record of energy-related disasters for the next year or two, and continue to point out that not one single American has ever lost their life in the production of nuclear energy.
Click to expand...



Interesting how this jackass IGNORES any information and/or facts presented on this thread regarding terminal cancers, local contamination and such related to nuke plants....see folks, in this dummy's mind you have to have IMMEDIATE disaster before an issue is taken seriously. So like a good little drudge he'll post up a disaster and say, "See!?!! This proves him wrong!"
:palm: I mean, he ADMITS to trying to hijack a thread in order to AVOID the true context of subject title. Typical of the intellectually bankrupt stooge when kissing corporate ass.

Here Dixie, deal with reality

http://www.springerlink.com/content/km57537rx76wm425/
 
Last edited:
Taichiliberal said:
Interesting how this jackass IGNORES any information and/or facts presented on this thread regarding terminal cancers, local contamination and such related to nuke plants....see folks, in this dummy's mind you have to have IMMEDIATE disaster before an issue is taken seriously. So like a good little drudge he'll post up a disaster and say, "See!?!! This proves him wrong!"
:palm: I mean, he ADMITS to trying to hijack a thread in order to AVOID the true context of subject title. Typical of the intellectually bankrupt stooge when kissing corporate ass.

Here Dixie, deal with reality

http://www.springerlink.com/content/km57537rx76wm425/
Click to expand...

All I know is, since you started this thread, we have had two major disasters in other energy production related industries, claiming many American lives. This stuff goes on all the time, we'll probably have several more such incidents before this year is over. Meanwhile... 60 years of nuclear energy production, and not a single American death.

The "reality" is, nuclear energy is the safest form of energy we have, with the possible exception of wind and solar, which is not adequate to meet our demands, nor practical for a main energy source. Hell, on second thought, nuke energy is PROBABLY even safer than wind... I am sure some pinhead liberal has walked right into one of those windmill blades, trying to get a closer look!

As for your propaganda about cancer rates, it doesn't mean a thing. It's over-hyped propaganda from enviro-wackos and all you've posted are links to activist sites with an anti-nuke agenda. The EPA as well as NRC are constantly monitoring nuclear facilities for any leaks or potential leaks, as well as any other possible hazards to the public. They have a very stringent and strict regulatory guide and protocol regarding potential dangers to the public, and again... no one in America has ever died from a nuclear power disaster. NADDA! NONE! ZIPPOLA! ....The counter keeps spinning for all the other forms of energy production, and I want to keep this thread updated on those, as a tribute to your stupidity.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Interesting how this jackass IGNORES any information and/or facts presented on this thread regarding terminal cancers, local contamination and such related to nuke plants....see folks, in this dummy's mind you have to have IMMEDIATE disaster before an issue is taken seriously. So like a good little drudge he'll post up a disaster and say, "See!?!! This proves him wrong!"
I mean, he ADMITS to trying to hijack a thread in order to AVOID the true context of subject title. Typical of the intellectually bankrupt stooge when kissing corporate ass.

Here Dixie, deal with reality

http://www.springerlink.com/content/km57537rx76wm425/
Click to expand...

Dixie said:
All I know is, since you started this thread, we have had two major disasters in other energy production related industries, claiming many American lives. This stuff goes on all the time, we'll probably have several more such incidents before this year is over. Meanwhile... 60 years of nuclear energy production, and not a single American death.


The "reality" is, nuclear energy is the safest form of energy we have, with the possible exception of wind and solar, which is not adequate to meet our demands, nor practical for a main energy source. Hell, on second thought, nuke energy is PROBABLY even safer than wind... I am sure some pinhead liberal has walked right into one of those windmill blades, trying to get a closer look!

As for your propaganda about cancer rates, it doesn't mean a thing. It's over-hyped propaganda from enviro-wackos and all you've posted are links to activist sites with an anti-nuke agenda. The EPA as well as NRC are constantly monitoring nuclear facilities for any leaks or potential leaks, as well as any other possible hazards to the public. They have a very stringent and strict regulatory guide and protocol regarding potential dangers to the public, and again... no one in America has ever died from a nuclear power disaster. NADDA! NONE! ZIPPOLA! ....The counter keeps spinning for all the other forms of energy production, and I want to keep this thread updated on those, as a tribute to your stupidity.
Click to expand...


Evidently you didn't read the information in the link I provided. That was just ONE example. Had you actually read the information you would have noted the source of it in the footnotes. Authors are with the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA, Address correspondence to Dr Jablon, National Cancer Institute, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Executive Plaza North, #408, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. I do hope you're not ignorant enough to think that the EPA and the NRC do not utilize or try to discount the findings of this institutes personnel (unless you have proof of such). Funny how you continually keep making assertions of fact based on your willfull ignorance, supposition and conjecture. You may continue to bray like an ass.
 
Last edited:
See what you did, Libby?

oil-rig-louisiana-destroyed-sank-spill_19467_600x450.jpg


All because of irrational fear of nuclear power.
 
Southern Man said:
See what you did, Libby?

oil-rig-louisiana-destroyed-sank-spill_19467_600x450.jpg


All because of irrational fear of nuclear power.
Click to expand...

No, THAT'S an occasional hazzard brought to us by neocon parrots like you and that dumb toot Palin chanting, "Drill, Baby, Drill!"

Here's the REAL fear of nuke power plants as they are today

http://www.springerlink.com/content/km57537rx76wm425/

But since you're too afraid to read it thoroughly, just continue braying like an ass. See ya next time. :cof1:
 
Taichiliberal said:
No, THAT'S an occasional hazzard brought to us by neocon parrots like you and that dumb toot Palin chanting, "Drill, Baby, Drill!"

Here's the REAL fear of nuke power plants as they are today

http://www.springerlink.com/content/km57537rx76wm425/

But since you're too afraid to read them thoroughly, just continue braying like an ass. See ya next time. :cof1:
Click to expand...

Since your tactic is to provide links without quotes, expecting me to guess at your position, I'll trump your link with two of mine:

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf06.html

http://users.owt.com/smsrpm/nksafe/

But since you're too afraid to read it thoroughly, just continue braying like an ass. See ya next time.
 
SM, you should ask the dimwit what form of energy he thinks we should do! From reading what he is posting, it appears he thinks we should abandon ALL energy, because none of it is completely safe. If he were in charge, no doubt, we would all be living in darkened caves, huddling around a fire to stay warm... no cars... no trains... no air travel... we wouldn't even be allowed to ride horses because of the animal rights activists he would be loyal to. Chicklet is a backward-thinking neanderthal, and he wants us all to live that way as well.

Had you actually read the information you would have noted the source of it in the footnotes. Authors are with the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA, Address correspondence to Dr Jablon, National Cancer Institute, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Executive Plaza North, #408, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Click to expand...

Chicky... here's the thing... I can take information from the Southern Baptist Convention, and parse out what I want to, and make you think it is Satan Worship in the end. People do this all the time, they take credible information, and put their spin on interpretation of the data. Your source was a biased left-wing activist anti-nuke propaganda site, and you purport what they say as if it is credible and objective journalism. It explains why you are such a fucked-in-the-head liberal idiot.
 
Dixie said:
SM, you should ask the dimwit what form of energy he thinks we should do! From reading what he is posting, it appears he thinks we should abandon ALL energy, because none of it is completely safe. If he were in charge, no doubt, we would all be living in darkened caves, huddling around a fire to stay warm... no cars... no trains... no air travel... we wouldn't even be allowed to ride horses because of the animal rights activists he would be loyal to. Chicklet is a backward-thinking neanderthal, and he wants us all to live that way as well.
Click to expand...
Wrong, Dixie- he wouldn't want us to have fires! :)
 
Dixie said:
SM, you should ask the dimwit what form of energy he thinks we should do! From reading what he is posting, it appears he thinks we should abandon ALL energy, because none of it is completely safe. If he were in charge, no doubt, we would all be living in darkened caves, huddling around a fire to stay warm... no cars... no trains... no air travel... we wouldn't even be allowed to ride horses because of the animal rights activists he would be loyal to. Chicklet is a backward-thinking neanderthal, and he wants us all to live that way as well.
Click to expand...

FLOWER POWER, BABY!!

1910096682_b9a2a7e736.jpg
 
Southern Man said:
Since your tactic is to provide links without quotes, expecting me to guess at your position, I'll trump your link with two of mine:

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf06.html

http://users.owt.com/smsrpm/nksafe/

But since you're too afraid to read it thoroughly, just continue braying like an ass. See ya next time.
Click to expand...

My link had this at the bottom:

Authors are with the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA, Address correspondence to Dr Jablon, National Cancer Institute, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Executive Plaza North, #408, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

Southy isn't bright enough to comprehend this....nor is he smart enough to actually debate the information contained in the article. So instead, he provides 2 PR pieces by Nuke company advocates that essentially say that since Chernyobl and Three Mile Island are the worst nuke accidents to date, and Chernyobl was a Russian problem based on a bad design, and NOTHING like that happened with 3 Mile Island, all is well.

Note that neither of Southy's links contained the FACT based information that my links provide. See folks, corporate wonks and their dupes depend upon what you DON'T know to justify their claims:

http://www.springerlink.com/content/km57537rx76wm425/

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/02/16/obama.nuclear.power/index.html

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=627706&postcount=39

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=628190&postcount=51

http://www.beyondnuclear.org/radioactive-waste/?currentPage=2

http://www.truthout.org/107091Levine

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=631075&postcount=96

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=631075&postcount=96
 
Last edited:
Taichiliberal said:
My link had this at the bottom:

Authors are with the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA, Address correspondence to Dr Jablon, National Cancer Institute, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Executive Plaza North, #408, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

Southy isn't bright enough to comprehend this....nor is he smart enough to actually debate the information contained in the article. So instead, he provides 2 PR pieces by Nuke company advocates that essentially say that since Chernyobl and Three Mile Island are the worst nuke accidents to date, and Chernyobl was a Russian problem based on a bad design, and NOTHING like that happened with 3 Mile Island, all is well.

Note that neither of Southy's links contained the FACT based information that my links provide. See folks, corporate wonks and their dupes depend upon what you DON'T know to justify their claims:

http://www.springerlink.com/content/km57537rx76wm425/
Click to expand...

Sorry Libbie but you set the precedent here. You need to read both of my links in their entirety, then guess at what my debate points will be. Obviously you did not.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
My link had this at the bottom:

Authors are with the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA, Address correspondence to Dr Jablon, National Cancer Institute, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Executive Plaza North, #408, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

Southy isn't bright enough to comprehend this....nor is he smart enough to actually debate the information contained in the article. So instead, he provides 2 PR pieces by Nuke company advocates that essentially say that since Chernyobl and Three Mile Island are the worst nuke accidents to date, and Chernyobl was a Russian problem based on a bad design, and NOTHING like that happened with 3 Mile Island, all is well.

Note that neither of Southy's links contained the FACT based information that my links provide. See folks, corporate wonks and their dupes depend upon what you DON'T know to justify their claims:

http://www.springerlink.com/content/km57537rx76wm425/
Click to expand...

Southern Man said:
Sorry Libbie but you set the precedent here. You need to read both of my links in their entirety, then guess at what my debate points will be. Obviously you did not.
Click to expand...

Typical Southie bullshit.....he can't state EXACTLY what was wrong with my summary of his two articles...so he just blows smokes as usual.

It took me a bit, but here's the edited version of my previous response with ALL the articles I've linked that contain information NOT present in the two recent links Southy provided.

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=640748&postcount=196
 
Taichiliberal said:
Typical Southie bullshit.....he can't state EXACTLY what was wrong with my summary of his two articles...so he just blows smokes as usual.

It took me a bit, but here's the edited version of my previous response with ALL the articles I've linked that contain information NOT present in the two recent links Southy provided.

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=640748&postcount=196
Click to expand...
Nuclear plants are very safe
Click to expand...
http://www.physorg.com/news91464289.html
Nuclear Power Compiles Impressive Safety Record
Click to expand...
http://www.heartland.org/policybot/..._Power_Compiles_Impressive_Safety_Record.html
This graph depicts U.S. nuclear industrial safety accident rates by year between 1997 and 2008. (link to ptt)
Click to expand...
http://www.nei.org/resourcesandstat...charts/usnuclearindustrialsafetyaccidentrate/
When it comes to the environment and electricity there are two basic schools of thought for clean energy: nuclear power versus wind/solar (and occasionally hydroelectric). Nuclear power has the advantage of being reliable (the weather doesn't effect it so it's great for base-line power) and cost effective. Its main problem is that it's scary.
Click to expand...
http://lawlegislationandlunacy.blogspot.com/2008/04/secret-safety-record-of-nuclear-power.html

Your fear is irrational, and leads to this:

oil-rig-louisiana-destroyed-sank-spill_19467_600x450.jpg
 
Southern Man said:
http://www.physorg.com/news91464289.html
http://www.heartland.org/policybot/..._Power_Compiles_Impressive_Safety_Record.html
http://www.nei.org/resourcesandstat...charts/usnuclearindustrialsafetyaccidentrate/
http://lawlegislationandlunacy.blogspot.com/2008/04/secret-safety-record-of-nuclear-power.html

Your fear is irrational, and leads to this:

oil-rig-louisiana-destroyed-sank-spill_19467_600x450.jpg
Click to expand...


AND ONCE AGAIN, NONE OF THE VALID, DOCUMENTED FACTS THAT ARE CONTAINED IN THE LINKS I PROVIDE ARE DISCUSSED IN THE INFORMATION YOU SOURCE:

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=640748&postcount=196

Like I said before, corporate wonks and neocon parrots just ignore what doesn't fit their beliefs, mantras and mindset.

Obviously, Southy doesn't have the guts to READ and then honestly discuss he information I provide, so he'll just blog every pro-nuke piece he can get instead. So be it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top