Yep he left his loaded service weapon in a Visitor's restroom. Talk about incompetent. What if a child had found it.
Now We Need To Revisit Lt. Michael Byrd
- Thread starter IBDaMann
- Start date
ZenMode
Well-known member
Seven words in and you're already lying.
What's the point in reading any further? You clearly aren't interested in an honest conversation.
Ashli Babbit in the Capitol for jumping vertically. Democrats were united in high-fiving Byrd for wasting a Trump supporter and quickly absolved him of all wrongdoing ... because, after all, Ashli Babbit was a Trump supporter. Democrats argued that Byrd was rightfully "frightened for his life" given all the after-the-fact hysteria that Democrats generated in order to bury Trump.
Enter SCOTUS. In a unanimous 9-0 landmark decision Barnes v. Felix less than two weeks ago (15 May 2025), the Supreme Court declared that it is not sufficient for a police officer to claim that he was in "fear for his life or the lives of others" when using deadly force. An objectively clear threat must exist such that it is determined that any rational, reasonable police officer in that situation would have also used deadly force. Given that the unarmed and peaceful Ashli Babbit's small vertical leap in a public building did not objectively obligate the use of deadly force, the cowardly Lt. Byrd needs to be arraigned for the blatant murder that he committed.
Last edited:
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Show me Ashli Babbit violence.
There is no point. You have always been committed to dishonesty.
Projection.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
The mob.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
What mob?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
... and accountants don't have to do their taxes.
ZenMode
Well-known member
She was the female smashing in a window and trying to crawl in to get to the area where Congressman were:
Your propaganda does not show her smashing the window. She did try and crawl through, being extremely small she was one of the few who could fit. Furthering the fact that she was no threat to Byrd when he summarily executed her.
ZenMode
Well-known member
What is or isn't a threat is subjective.
If you were to wake up in the middle of the night to an angry female smashing in your window, trying to get into your house, wearing a backpack with unknown contents and refusing to stop when told to stop, I suspect you would see that as a threat to those inside your house.
Not according to the SCOTUS.
The execution was politically motivated. No one was in fear for their life.
ZenMode
Well-known member
I don't know how SCOTUS or any other person can intelligently speak for the feelings of everyone inside the Capitol.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
I just have to tell you that you are among the shittiest people on the planet. You are always dishonest, and you lie to support criminals. I can't think of a single post in which you have been honest, and now I realize that you just aren't a part of humanity.
1. Smashing a window is not violently attacking anyone
2. Ashli Babbit didn't smash any windows.
Ashli Babbit was shot in the act of jumping vertically. Movement is not violence and does not warrant an extrajudicial death sentence.
You really are shitty. Fuck you. Obviously you think that pretending to be inhumane will make up for your scientific illiteracy, your mathematical incompetence and your logical ineptitude.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
I don't know how any scientifically illiterate person can intelligently speak for the "general consensus" of everyone in the "scientific community."
ZenMode
Well-known member
If you were to wake up in the middle of the night to an angry female smashing in your window, trying to get into your house, wearing a backpack with unknown contents and refusing to stop when told to stop, I suspect you would see that as a threat to those inside your house.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Ashli Babbit didn't smash any windows.
Ashli Babbit was already inside the Capitol, and was not somehow "breaking and entering", which does not warrant summary extrajudicial execution anyway.
You know all this, and you cannot bring yourself to be honest, because you are that shitty of a person.
Let's look at your position. You are invited into the Capitol by the Capitol police who open the front doors for you. Someone else smashes some glass. An armed Capitol police officer executes you because you were wearing a backpack. There's nothing to see here, move along, move along.
Your position is stupid. You are shitty.
ZenMode
Well-known member
I thought she smashed the window.
So, you're Capitol police and your job is to protect the people inside the door you are guarding and there is an angry female, wearing a backpack with unknown contents, who may or may not be armed, coming through a busted out window.
What should he do? Approach/fight with her and hope she's not armed and there are no explosives in the backpack?
Last edited:
IBDaMann
Well-known member
In this hypothetical scenario, am I authorized to summarily execute people if I feel like it, or do I need to obey the law?
Ashli Babbit was not angry. Let's make the hypothetical scenario applicable. Let's say that there is a patriotic female, former military who loves her country, who wants to move from point A to point B, and she isn't any danger to anyone, except that I am annoyed that despite my orders that she NOT move from point A to point B, she seems intent on doing so anyway.
Irrelevant. This occurs billions of times every hour every day every week and has always been totally legal for as long as humanity has existed on the planet. In this scenario, I also don't know what brand of makeup she is wearing, I don't know how much money she is carrying, and I don't know if her breasts are as big as they appear or if she is wearing a push-up bra. I presume that, in this scenario, that the woman in question has full 4th Amendment protections, yes?
... for whom I have no reason to suspect is armed, and over the time I have been eyeing her like a hawk, I haven't seen any hint of any weapons, right?
I should "tresspass" her and escort her out of the building.
Yes, that is what I would be required to do. Nothing in what you described afforded me license to shoot her.
Are you not aware that people with backpacks approach police all the time, and that police approach people with backpacks all the time? Are you not aware that backpacks are legal?
Are you not aware that people wearing denim jeans approach police all the time, and that police approach people wearing denim jeans all the time? Are you not aware that denim jeans are legal?
Feelings aren't the criteria. There was no physical danger to Byrd. He killed an unarmed protester for political reasons.
You would agree then that the insurrectionists in Los Angeles should be mowed down by Machine Gun fire. They are invading our country and acting violently toward law enforcement.
Or just pick one woman at random and blow their brains out as a warning to the rest - exactly what Byrd did. It's going down now - so you must support the summary execution in this case - or admit that you just support killing Babbitt because she was an enemy of the party.