now here is some major hypocrisy

A deputy is now suing a woman who called for help during an emergency. It all stems from a deputy-involved shooting that happened in Katy last year.

The deputy says he was injured when she made that call from her subdivision. In this lawsuit, he claims the homeowner failed to adequately warn 9-1-1 of the dangerous situation he was walking into.

The lawsuit just filed in Harris County is raising some eyebrows.

Sheriff's deputy Brady Pullen is suing a woman named Camina Figueroa after a 9-1-1 call the deputy responded to at Figueroa's Katy home back in December.

The lawsuit claims Pullen was violently and physically attacked by a man who'd allegedly been using bath salts as a drug for several days.

"Look, it's unprecedented" Harris County Sheriff Adrian Garcia said. "So we're allowing our legal staff to manage this case and we'll see where it takes us."

Sheriff Garcia wouldn't say much about Pullen's civil lawsuit but called the filing by his deputy unprecedented.

In the court documents, Pullen alleges Figueroa was negligent because she knew the man's mental state rendered him a danger to others.

Pullen says he suffered a broken nose, concussion, lacerations and bruises when the man in Figueroa's house attacked him. That man was ultimately shot and killed after investigators say he reached for Pullen's gun.

The deputy's Austin-based attorney told me his team's operating under the theory that if someone is injured due to a homeowner or renter's failure to warn of dangerous circumstances, then you have a right to sue.

http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=9207650

how many of you police statists approve of this shit?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
cops have no legal duty or responsibility to provide protection to any individual, as many black robed tyrants have claimed, yet recently in the news there was a hate crime that took place (though it's not been called a hate crime) on a school bus and the cops are trying to charge the bus driver with child neglect because he didn't provide protection to the victim.

http://www.wfla.com/story/22958589/new-surveillance-video-shows-vicious-bus-attack
Click to expand...


There's a difference between a cop having a legal obligation to protect every individual and a bus driver's responsibility to protect the specific children in his care.
 
Dungheap said:
There's a difference between a cop having a legal obligation to protect every individual and a bus driver's responsibility to protect the specific children in his care.
Click to expand...
maybe you can explain how that difference works then when we authorize and encourage cops to carry firearms to defend themselves in order for them to be safer while 'protecting' society from violent and dangerous individuals and mandating that unarmed bus drivers (with no training at all) protect students on their bus from multiple assailants.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
maybe you can explain how that difference works then when we authorize and encourage cops to carry firearms to defend themselves in order for them to be safer while 'protecting' society from violent and dangerous individuals and mandating that unarmed bus drivers (with no training at all) protect students on their bus from multiple assailants.
Click to expand...


Your mind works in strange ways.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
cops have no legal duty or responsibility to provide protection to any individual, as many black robed tyrants have claimed, yet recently in the news there was a hate crime that took place (though it's not been called a hate crime) on a school bus and the cops are trying to charge the bus driver with child neglect because he didn't provide protection to the victim.

http://www.wfla.com/story/22958589/new-surveillance-video-shows-vicious-bus-attack
Click to expand...

And if the bus driver HAD stepped in, the parents of any child he lays his hands on while breaking up the fight would sue his and the School District's asses.

You read the District's policy: "According to Pinellas school bus driver policy the driver's first duty is to call dispatch, and only has to step in if they think it's safe. They're not required to intervene."
 
ZappasGuitar said:
And if the bus driver HAD stepped in, the parents of any child he lays his hands on while breaking up the fight would sue his and the School District's asses.

You read the District's policy: "According to Pinellas school bus driver policy the driver's first duty is to call dispatch, and only has to step in if they think it's safe. They're not required to intervene."
Click to expand...

maybe you should call the pinellas sheriff and inform him of this policy.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
And if the bus driver HAD stepped in, the parents of any child he lays his hands on while breaking up the fight would sue his and the School District's asses.

You read the District's policy: "According to Pinellas school bus driver policy the driver's first duty is to call dispatch, and only has to step in if they think it's safe. They're not required to intervene."
Click to expand...

Sounds like they took chapter and verse from NYPD officers in the train, armed officers (unlike a bus driver), watching a man being repeatedly stabbed in the head and upper body.

Good enough for the police, good enough for a bus driver.

Lesson to be learned: Plan on defending yourself if the unexpected actually occurs.
 
Annie said:
Sounds like they took chapter and verse from NYPD officers in the train, armed officers (unlike a bus driver), watching a man being repeatedly stabbed in the head and upper body.

Good enough for the police, good enough for a bus driver.

Lesson to be learned: Plan on defending yourself if the unexpected actually occurs.
Click to expand...

SmarterthanYou's message is that all cops are corrupt. Like others on this forum.

They assume that all cops are corrupt and not just some, just like they assume that all gun owners are responsible and not just some.

Generally, Right Wingers are motivated by profit and I deemed "SmarterthanYou" a drug dealer long ago. He/she didn't protest.
 
Anti-Party said:
SmarterthanYou's message is that all cops are corrupt. Like others on this forum.

They assume that all cops are corrupt and not just some, just like they assume that all gun owners are responsible and not just some.

Generally, Right Wingers are motivated by profit and I deemed "SmarterthanYou" a drug dealer long ago. He/she didn't protest.
Click to expand...

because you don't know me, in the slightest, the notion is too laughable to even consider replying to.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
maybe you can explain how that difference works then when we authorize and encourage cops to carry firearms to defend themselves in order for them to be safer while 'protecting' society from violent and dangerous individuals and mandating that unarmed bus drivers (with no training at all) protect students on their bus from multiple assailants.
Click to expand...

the student h e go to Lealman school and this is not far from m y school. the bus driver he could not protect the guy because he will get beat up also



.
 
Annie said:
Sounds like they took chapter and verse from NYPD officers in the train, armed officers (unlike a bus driver), watching a man being repeatedly stabbed in the head and upper body.

Good enough for the police, good enough for a bus driver.

Lesson to be learned: Plan on defending yourself if the unexpected actually occurs.
Click to expand...


Do you deny that the parents of any kid touched by that driver would have probably sued him and the School District for violating the District policy?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top