Nov 16 2016. Super liberal wikipedia still saying Hillary won popular vote!!

I don't really get what conservatives are trying to accomplish by saying that, if California didn't exist, Hillary Clinton wouldn't have win the popular votevote. Look, if Texas didn't exist, George Bush wouldn't have the popular vote in 2004 either. What's the point of thus exercise? Eliminating parts of America you don't like until you get the result you want?

If CA were to secede, that silly campaign slogan would become a reality.
 
Fuck text driver for being the dumbest fucker here.
Hillary won the popular vote you ignorant piece of shit.

The media is lying just like they lied about how hillary was sure to win the election. They wanted us to give up on trump so they fixed all the polls. Now they are lying about the popular vote to support the idea of getting the electoral college to not vote for trump.
 
The media is lying just like they lied about how hillary was sure to win the election. They wanted us to give up on trump so they fixed all the polls. Now they are lying about the popular vote to support the idea of getting the electoral college to not vote for trump.
Please tell me you don't have children.
You are proof that Sanger was correct.
 
Everyone else says trump won pop vote and EC vote.

W says trump 61,296,121 = 46.78%

Hillary 62,490,187 = 47.69%

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2016

219.png
 
Yep .. there are indeed lots of really uninformed people .. and you appear to be one of them.

Hillary Clinton’s Popular-Vote Victory Is Unprecedented—and Still Growing
Her margin is now bigger than the winning margins for John Kennedy and Richard Nixon.

Hillary Clinton now leads the national popular vote for president by roughly one million votes, and her victory margin is expanding rapidly. That margin could easily double before the end of an arduous process of counting ballots, reviewing results and reconciling numbers for an official total.

... The nonpartisan Cook Political Report maintains one of the most frequently updated spreadsheets on the race. One week after the election, it had Clinton with 62,403,269 votes to 61,242,652 for Trump. That puts Clinton ahead by 1.16 million votes. Another able chronicler of the count, Dave Leip’s Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections, also puts Clinton ahead by more than one million votes.
https://www.thenation.com/article/h...e-victory-is-unprecedented-and-still-growing/

Hope that helps.

219.png
 
I don't really get what conservatives are trying to accomplish by saying that, if California didn't exist, Hillary Clinton wouldn't have win the popular votevote. Look, if Texas didn't exist, George Bush wouldn't have the popular vote in 2004 either. What's the point of thus exercise? Eliminating parts of America you don't like until you get the result you want?

219.png
 
You still don't get it. The media is claiming that hillary won the popular vote and thus the electoral college has an obligation to choose her over trump. That's why it's important to point out that trump won the pop vote. And if we throw out the millions of votes cast by illegals, then it wasn't even close. THINK

You're fucking delusional. Nobody in the media that I've seen has made that claim.
 
The media is lying just like they lied about how hillary was sure to win the election. They wanted us to give up on trump so they fixed all the polls. Now they are lying about the popular vote to support the idea of getting the electoral college to not vote for trump.

Rune is correct. You are one stupid motherfucker.
 
You're fucking delusional. Nobody in the media that I've seen has made that claim.

Like hell. The media lied about the polls before the election and then when hillary lost anyway they lie and tell us she won the pop vote and so the electors should give her the presidency. !!!

This is the same press that crucified trump when he said in debate 3 that he might contest the election!!
 
Back
Top