Not strength, weakness.

I Love America said:
How would you go about stopping the next Jihad Jane from coming here and killing people?
Click to expand...

I don't think there is much that could stop her at this point. A ban on assault rifles might have worked before so many were made and distributed. More and better monitoring of radicals with better coordination with Saudi Arabia. Long term energy independence and more economical vehicles (less terrorist funding SUV's). Foreign policy that did not install ruthless dictators in the ME. Less American involvement in the ME, going back to the Rumsfeld days of the 1980's. Not having invaded Iraq in 2002.
 
Jarod said:
I don't think there is much that could stop her at this point.

So you can't stop them? But you are OK with them coming here?

A ban on assault rifles might have worked before so many were made and distributed.

How would that have stopped them from using pipe bombs?

More and better monitoring of radicals with better coordination with Saudi Arabia.

What about her past would have classified her as a radical? She made through the most strictest screening processes we have.

Long term energy independence and more economical vehicles (less terrorist funding SUV's). Foreign policy that did not install ruthless dictators in the ME. Less American involvement in the ME, going back to the Rumsfeld days of the 1980's. Not having invaded Iraq in 2002.
Click to expand...


While I am sure you are trying to be sincere, the rest of your post is irrelevant to the attacks in San Bernardino and would do nothing to keep Jihadi's from coming here to kill us.
 
I Love America said:
While I am sure you are trying to be sincere, the rest of your post is irrelevant to the attacks in San Bernardino and would do nothing to keep Jihadi's from coming here to kill us.
Click to expand...

1) I don't think we can stop them from coming here.
2) I would not stop them from using pipe bombs, but luckily they generally are not as deadly as assault rifles.
3) Apparently she was tagged by her school in Saudi Arabia and watched as a potential violent radical.
4) I disagree, the rest of my post was about what set in motion the radical Muslim movement.
 
Jarod said:
1) I don't think we can stop them from coming here.
2) I would not stop them from using pipe bombs, but luckily they generally are not as deadly as assault rifles.
3) Apparently she was tagged by her school in Saudi Arabia and watched as a potential violent radical.
4) I disagree, the rest of my post was about what set in motion the radical Muslim movement.
Click to expand...

This post is why Trump is gaining in popularity. You are completely oblivious to the threat we are facing and are too willing to make excuses for them.
 
Jarod said:
How is Donald Trump's plan of asking everyone at the border if they are Muslim or not going to stop a terrorist from entering the Country?
Click to expand...

That is what they do now you moron; Jihad Jane checked the box that asked if she was a terrorist or engaged in terrorist activities.

You are further evidence that Democrats are low information voters.

Jarod said:
I can explain how its going to piss of the non-violent Muslim street who we so desperately need on our side.
Click to expand...

Yeah right; the non-violent Muslims are going to now become violent because we don't want more terrorists getting into the country.

Moron.
 
Jarod said:
How is Trumps plan going to make anyone safer?
Click to expand...

Because it puts an immediate stop to any potential terrorists trying to get into the country under the current failed and lax system, then it asks to take a very long review of the current process and how to make it more fool-proof in the future.

Unlike giddy dumbfucks on the left that wring their hands in the wake of a recent terror assault and stupidly whine about how mean spirited WE are.

Earth to Liberal dumbfucks; WE aren't the ones going around committing terror acts; THEY are.

Jarod said:
Does it not have a significant chance of actually harming our relationship with the very people we need, the Muslim Street.
Click to expand...

I am always fascinated when LibTards are so concerned with harming the relationship of Muslims, but when it comes to Christians; they stupidly think you can march them off to the gulag for not catering gay weddings.

Are you people really this stupid naturally, or do you have to work at it?
 
Jarod said:
Are you going to call Benjamin Netanyahu soft on terror?
Click to expand...

You don't find it ironic that a nation that is surrounded by a fence tightly controlling who can come and go criticizing Trump on his comments to immediately stop Muslim immigration until we FIX our process?

You really are a dumb moron aren't you?
 
The DUPE said:
Klan angst
They are American jihadist
Cousin marrier
Click to expand...

moron.jpg
 
Jarod said:
I don't think there is much that could stop her at this point. A ban on assault rifles might have worked before so many were made and distributed. More and better monitoring of radicals with better coordination with Saudi Arabia. Long term energy independence and more economical vehicles (less terrorist funding SUV's). Foreign policy that did not install ruthless dictators in the ME. Less American involvement in the ME, going back to the Rumsfeld days of the 1980's. Not having invaded Iraq in 2002.
Click to expand...

LMAO; so nothing less than a ban would have prevented the terrorists in SB; but in France, where weapons are banned, the Jihadists were able to get their hands on fully automatic assault rifles, grenades and explosives, therefore, it is a gun problem. This is the stupidity we have come to expect from the clueless left who seem to be unable to whipe their own asses without the Government.
 
This thread is a fail in that it takes the OPINION of a leader of a nation that has fenced itself in and strictly controls who can come and go across their borders.

Liberals really are THAT fucking dumb.

epicfailue.gif
 
Jarod said:
I do not have a problem with asking them their religion as part of the refugee process.

So... Now its time for you to answer my question, before I go further with your questions....

How is Trumps plan going to make anyone safer? Does it not have a significant chance of actually harming our relationship with the very people we need, the Muslim Street.
Click to expand...

What makes you think WE need them ? The fact that they are coming here sure seems like they need us.
 
Underworld King Star said:
Trump's "plan" is to ask people at the border if they're a Muslim if they're a Muslim and deny them based on that. It's the dumbest thing I've ever heard of in my life. Obviously everyone is just going to answer no to that question in such a case, especially any terrorists.
Click to expand...

Where did this idea that Trump is going to ask people AT THE BORDER anything....are you stupid enough to think thats how immigration works ?
 
NOVA said:
Where did this idea that Trump is going to ask people AT THE BORDER anything....are you stupid enough to think thats how immigration works ?
Click to expand...

That was his response when asked how he'd implement his plan. He said immigration officials would ask people if they are Muslim or not.
 
cawacko said:
That was his response when asked how he'd implement his plan. He said immigration officials would ask people if they are Muslim or not.
Click to expand...



Immigration officials also insure that visa applicants are vetted properly too...long before they reach the border...., that could be what Trump was referring too....

not that it matters, as long as they are stopped and properly vetted without exception....

People walking up to the border and demanding entry should be turned away immediately as a matter of course...
 
Truth Detector said:
LMAO; so nothing less than a ban would have prevented the terrorists in SB; but in France, where weapons are banned, the Jihadists were able to get their hands on fully automatic assault rifles, grenades and explosives, therefore, it is a gun problem. This is the stupidity we have come to expect from the clueless left who seem to be unable to whipe their own asses without the Government.
Click to expand...


Well, if radical jihadi's don't have access to guns, they would be flummoxed as to how to cause massive killing. They wouldn't have a fucking clue. That is the calculus that liberals like GayRod are making. Brilliant huh?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top