NOT MAKING HEADLINES: AZ Audit Could Not Find the Identity of 86,391 Voters

christiefan915 said:
IKR? They are pretty close to the bottom of the barrel when it comes to factual reporting.

Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Nationalism, Some Fake News, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW
Country: USA (44/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Click to expand...

Hey Darlin' move along now... Nothin' ta see here...
 
OldMercsRule said:
Why would you say that? You can't read my mind, You have zero idea what I know or how I do my homework.
Click to expand...

Because you posted a link from a partisan site that had an issue about a different page of the report then tried to use that by copy/pasting a portion of what you thought was a gotcha moment without regard to actually understanding what you were talking about.

Then you said, "No you didn't" while quoting my post about going to the actual report and reading page 56...

Basically, everything you posted after starting from "no you didn't" then "I did" to the last word of the post was simple nonsense.
 
Concart said:
It doesn't matter how many times you repeat the lie, it will still be a lie. There were ZERO imaginary folks. None. Every one had a name and an address. Every one was filled out by a registered voter. Your conclusion is not supported by the facts. Lie some more. I'll debunk you some more. It's kind of fun.
Click to expand...

"Fun", you're a lot more patient than I am. I find these conspiracy theories unbearably annoying.
 
OldMercsRule said:
They were obviously connected. Not that the #1 Marxist Parrot will admit that, (he is not real bright. That is why the criminal election officials blocked access to the routers. Rejoice Marxists fer a few more days of censorship, after that: you will not be able to stop the train leaving the station... burp... "We the people" don't matter anymore, China pics our elected officials!!!!

This republic is gone unless we get this fixed.
Click to expand...

I actually don’t follow this issue much and I frankly wish they’d move on from it sometimes. And I stay the hell away from IT debates lol. It’s just not my gig.

That said, I heard from one source that internet connections were involved at some point. We were told that never happens. Can you or anyone else verify it?
 
Flash said:
Can't admit when you are wrong, Proud Boy? Read the actual report and not some trash source. Is the actual report too many pages for you?
Click to expand...

Get fucked: Marxist. How do you fucks know what I did do or have done? I may have only one functional brain cell, but: I know what I know, (and you or DAMOCLES can't read my simple mind), and you have no idea how I do my home work.
 
christiefan915 said:
There is NO SOLID PROOF about the 90K imaginary voters, that's what we're criticizing in the article.
Click to expand...

Again, the report says that there should be canvassing and verification done. That's what I am suggesting be done.

Pretending that having a huge portion of the population thinking that elections are rigged is a "good thing" because you believe they are "crazy" doesn't change that making sure they believe them by actually doing what was recommended would help rather than hinder the supposed healing you want in the nation.
 
Damocles said:
Because you posted a link from a partisan site that had an issue about a different page of the report then tried to use that by copy/pasting a portion of what you thought was a gotcha moment without regard to actually understanding what you were talking about.

Then you said, "No you didn't" while quoting my post about going to the actual report and reading page 56...

Basically, everything you posted after starting from "no you didn't" then "I did" to the last word of the post was simple nonsense.
Click to expand...

BULL SHIT!
 
Darth Omar said:
I actually don’t follow this issue much and I frankly wish they’d move on from it sometimes. And I stay the hell away from IT debates lol. It’s just not my gig.

That said, I heard from one source that internet connections were involved at some point. We were told that never happens. Can you or anyone else verify it?
Click to expand...

I believe that was a different election. I'll look into it for you, and hopefully will remember to tell you what I find.
 
OldMercsRule said:
Get fucked: Marxist. How do you fucks know what I did do or have done? I may have only one functional brain cell, but: I know what I know, (and you or DAMOCLES can't read my simple mind), and you have no idea how I do my home work.
Click to expand...

If you read the report you know there was no fraud (or Chinese ballots) found and they had almost identical results as the Maricopa County results except Trump lost votes. It is too easy to disprove Trump's claims of fraud.
 
Damocles said:
I read the story, went to page 56 and read what it said to verify the source material. You did not. You searched for something you thought said something else about this same page, then posted it, but missed the mark.
Click to expand...

I could care what the fuck you did. You have no idea what I did. You really make me mad tellin' me what I have or what I haven't done. YOU CAN'T READ MY MIND OR SPEAK FOR ME I DON"T FUCKING CARE IF YOU OWN THIS FUCKING FORUM... grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!
 
Damocles said:
Rawstory now...

Regardless, this does not change what page 56 of the report says. Nor does it make what you posted actually reading the report, it also does not show you went to the source to verify the story about it...

Nothing you say here changes the accuracy of what I said when I told you I downloaded the report, went to page 56 and read what it said to verify what the story had to say about page 56 of this report.
Click to expand...

I read page 56 and it said CN used a commercially-available database called Personator. So my question is what database of voters does the state use and did CN check against that database also, and compare the two.
 
Damocles said:
If in every single case it happens it is "just enough to win", then it is evidence that is is coordinated and organized.

Whether or not it is coordinated or organized, in this case we know that nearly 90K imaginary folks voted in an election that we have no evidence that they actually exist. This is a problem.
Click to expand...
and an easily confirmed problem......I would think every serious journalist in the country would already be investigating it.........
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top