NOT MAKING HEADLINES: AZ Audit Could Not Find the Identity of 86,391 Voters

OldMercsRule said:
Cyber Ninjas Report: 255,326 Ballots Cast, No Record Of Receipt

"Cyber Ninjas’ Doug Logan publicly presented his still incomplete report for the Maricopa County forensic audit to the Arizona State Senate on Sept. 24. One finding alone in his report shows 255,326 votes that have no corresponding record of having been received."

https://uncoverdc.com/2021/09/28/cyber-ninjas-report-255326-ballots-cast-no-record-of-receipt/

Just pure as the driven snow: Marxists... move along nothin' ta see here... burp...
Click to expand...

No you didn't. You posted what UndercoverDC reports about a different issue.
 
BartenderElite said:
It will be years - maybe generations - before we'll be able to calculate the damage that all of this investigating & auditing & all of the misinformation regarding election integrity is doing to our republic. I don't think millions will ever accept election results again.

We're close to a year after the election. People don't realize how much of a negative effect their words are having, or constantly bringing up stories like this. There was no massive fraud, there was no coordinated fraud. The ONLY reason anyone says there was is because a pathological liar said so. And he said the same in 2016, and he called the 2012 election a sham.

That's literally the only reason. If Trump conceded on the day after the election, we'd have all moved on by now.
Click to expand...

If nothing else has been proven our elections have way too many moving parts. Is it true that voting machines were attached to the internet? If so, that’s kind of a problem.

If you want more people to have faith in elections—do something about it.
 
OldMercsRule said:
NOT MAKING HEADLINES: AZ Audit Could Not Find the Identity of 86,391 Voters – They Don’t Appear to Exist and 73.8% Are Democrat or No Party Affiliation

"his is disclosed on Page 56 of the “Results Details” report.

These Maricopa voters cast ballots in Nov 2020 and don’t seem to exist. The ones registered as Democrat or selected no party affiliation represent a whopping 73.8% of these unknown voters. That’s 63,757 ballots. Not selecting a party makes monitoring of nefarious registrations much harder as everything not R or D is bulked together as “Other”. Even the new State voter registration form now only has only 3 categories (R, D, Other) and some registration reporting reduced to similar."
Click to expand...

51% are Republican or no party affiliation

If they are "unknown voters" how do they know their party affiliation?

The report does not say this involved fraud. They stated "It is expected that most if not all of these individuals are in fact real people with a limited public record and commercial presence."
(page 56).

The report did not say these people did not exist. It said they were not in a commercially available data source provided by Melissa called Personator. You can look up your name on this site.

The "don't appear to exist" part is only in the Gateway Pundit source which is not very creditable. "The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is an American far-right[SUP][2][/SUP] fake news website.[SUP][1][/SUP] The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.[SUP][28][/SUP]
 
Last edited:
Darth Omar said:
If nothing else has been proven our elections have way too many moving parts. Is it true that voting machines were attached to the internet? If so, that’s kind of a problem.

If you want more people to have faith in elections—do something about it.
Click to expand...

The machines were not attached to the internet.
 
Flash said:
51% are Republican or no party affiliation

If they are "unknown voters" how do they know their party affiliation?

The report does not say this involved fraud. They stated "It is expected that most if not all of these individuals are in fact real people with a limited public record and commercial presence."
(page 56).
Click to expand...

Correct. They attempted to match the names against a commercial database and didn't find them. Because they aren't there. People with no phone weren't in the phonebook. This is much ado about nothing. But here we are on page five (for me anyway) debating a false claim that can be debunked by just reading the report. This is the Trump Cult. And THIS is gaslighting. Claiming something that is demonstrably untrue.
 
Damocles said:
However it will be ignored, even by folks that pretend that election integrity matters to them.

This is evidence of fraud, on a "just large enough" scale to change things. It doesn't have to be "widespread" it only has to happen in enough swing states' larger cities in order to overturn an election. In some of the closer ones it doesn't even have to be this large. If election integrity is important, then who votes matters. Just "count all the votes" is a great bumper sticker but if I vote 360,000 times you shouldn't count them just because they are "votes", in fact you shouldn't count them at all and I should go to prison.

One way to avoid this kind of thing in the future with "just enough" nonsense is to stop allowing folks to report any results in a state until the entire state's results are in. Report it all in one... that way they simply will not know what "just enough" is and will have to do things differently.
Click to expand...

It's BS. I can't believe you give this conspiracy theory any credence. Because Cyber Ninjas "couldn't" find the identity of 86,000 voters doesn't mean they don't exist. How does it work that you can't find the identity of these voters but you know to a specific percentage that they are Democrat or unaffiliated? Even Cyber Ninjas agreed Biden won Arizona by +/- 45,000 votes.

"Ahead of the presentation, election experts criticized some of the methodology used by Cyber Ninjas that was detailed in the draft report. The report said the firm used a commercial public database to try to match information about voters. Such databases typically rely on the National Change of Address database, which can be out of date and incomplete and isn't designed for that purpose, said Barry Burden, the Director of the Elections Research Center at the University of Wisconsin-Madison."
 
Darth Omar said:
What about the modems?
Click to expand...

They were obviously connected. Not that the #1 Marxist Parrot will admit that, (he is not real bright. That is why the criminal election officials blocked access to the routers. Rejoice Marxists fer a few more days of censorship, after that: you will not be able to stop the train leaving the station... burp... "We the people" don't matter anymore, China pics our elected officials!!!!

This republic is gone unless we get this fixed.
 
christiefan915 said:
It's BS. I can't believe you give this conspiracy theory any credence. Because Cyber Ninjas "couldn't" find the identity of 86,000 voters doesn't mean they don't exist. How does it work that you can't find the identity of these voters but you know to a specific percentage that they are Democrat or unaffiliated? Even Cyber Ninjas agreed Biden won Arizona by +/- 45,000 votes.

[FONT=&]"Ahead of the presentation, election experts criticized some of the methodology used by Cyber Ninjas that was detailed in the draft report. The report said the firm used a commercial public database to try to match information about voters. Such databases typically rely on the National Change of Address database, which can be out of date and incomplete and isn't designed for that purpose, said Barry Burden, the Director of the Elections Research Center at the University of Wisconsin-Madison."[/FONT]
Click to expand...

Yes, I agree. One does not mean the other. It does mean, however, that we should look more into it than just simply saying "hack" at it and ignore the issue. AS the report noted, canvassing and finding out is the recommendation.

Take each of the things it says to check on, add them up, and you have reasons why folks think that elections integrity needs help.
 
Damocles said:
I read the story, went to page 56 and read what it said to verify the source material. You did not. You searched for something you thought said something else about this same page, then posted it, but missed the mark.
Click to expand...

what is wrong with righyts and their desperate attempts to believe Trump won. Here is what the leader of Cyber Nitwits said. He addressed the Gateway crap pile. https://www.rawstory.com/cyber-ninjas-doctored-report/
 
Damocles said:
I read the story, went to page 56 and read what it said to verify the source material. You did not. You searched for something you thought said something else about this same page, then posted it, but missed the mark.
Click to expand...

Why would you say that? You can't read my mind, You have zero idea what I know or how I do my homework.
 
Darth Omar said:
If nothing else has been proven our elections have way too many moving parts. Is it true that voting machines were attached to the internet? If so, that’s kind of a problem.

If you want more people to have faith in elections—do something about it.
Click to expand...

I can't do anything about people who want to believe a pathological liar, when they know he lies constantly.

Over 150 million people vote. We're doing fine. The 2020 election has withstood more scrutiny than any other - even 2000.
 
Jade Dragon said:
#GatewayPunditSurrender
Click to expand...

IKR? They are pretty close to the bottom of the barrel when it comes to factual reporting.

Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Nationalism, Some Fake News, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW
Country: USA (44/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
 
Nordberg said:
what is wrong with righyts and their desperate attempts to believe Trump won. Here is what the leader of Cyber Nitwits said. He addressed the Gateway crap pile. https://www.rawstory.com/cyber-ninjas-doctored-report/
Click to expand...

Rawstory now...

Regardless, this does not change what page 56 of the report says. Nor does it make what you posted actually reading the report, it also does not show you went to the source to verify the story about it...

Nothing you say here changes the accuracy of what I said when I told you I downloaded the report, went to page 56 and read what it said to verify what the story had to say about page 56 of this report.
 
Flash said:
51% are Republican or no party affiliation

If they are "unknown voters" how do they know their party affiliation?

The report does not say this involved fraud. They stated "It is expected that most if not all of these individuals are in fact real people with a limited public record and commercial presence."
(page 56).

The report did not say these people did not exist. It said they were not in a commercially available data source provided by Melissa called Personator. You can look up your name on this site.

The "don't appear to exist" part is only in the Gateway Pundit source which is not very creditable. "The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is an American far-right[SUP][2][/SUP] fake news website.[SUP][1][/SUP] The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.[SUP][28][/SUP]
Click to expand...

As I have said repeatedly: Marxist... MOVE ALONG... NOTHIN' TA SEE HERE!
 
Damocles said:
You need too stop yourself. I am not defending "these people" because they have an R, that's you trying to gaslight as I predicted would happen.

"You must be crazy"...

"You must be a partisan hack"...

These are simply projecting, and gaslighting statements.

When there are more than 90K apparently imaginary folks who voted in an election that cannot be found in reality, there is a problem and we should look into it, especially when the vote split was less than that number.
Click to expand...

There is NO SOLID PROOF about the 90K imaginary voters, that's what we're criticizing in the article.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top