No racial bias in police shootings, study by Harvard professor shows

The Anonymous

Bag On My Head
10fryer2-superJumbo.jpg


“On the most extreme use of force — officer-involved shootings — we find no racial differences in either the raw data or when contextual factors are taken into account,”


https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w22399/w22399.pdf

Naturally, the fact-hating left got him fired.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/10/business/economy/roland-fryer-harvard.html
 
LOL the left will ignore this, or like the douchebag above, will just make wisecracks because they have no rebuttal. LOL
fuck BLM!
 
10fryer2-superJumbo.jpg


“On the most extreme use of force — officer-involved shootings — we find no racial differences in either the raw data or when contextual factors are taken into account,”


https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w22399/w22399.pdf

Naturally, the fact-hating left got him fired.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/10/business/economy/roland-fryer-harvard.html

All the studies have shown the same thing. I'm surprised this one hasn't been censored by the Left and removed from the internet.
 
“On the most extreme use of force — officer-involved shootings — we find no racial differences in either the raw data or when contextual factors are taken into account,”

Naturally, the fact-hating left got him fired.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/10/business/economy/roland-fryer-harvard.html

As usual, “copy and paste” is incorrect, and here on so many levels

First off, the guys paper didn’t say it didn’t occur, rather that there is no quantitative proof it does or doesn’t exist, and secondly, his paper never received peer review (https://www.snopes.com/news/2016/07/15/harvard-study-officer-involved-shootings/), meaning, it is his opinion, and that is all

And lastly, the guy was fired by Harvard for accusations of sexual conduct (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...d-two-years-over-sexual-harassmen/1693011001/) and not be published a paper as “copy and paste” implies

Typical
 
Like Cuomo and Biden?

Are you positing that the data was false because the researcher was accused of something unrelated?

I postsd that the paper doesn’t say what you imply, it is only one guy’s opinion and nothing more, and the guy was fired because of accusations of sexual misconduct, all facts
 
10fryer2-superJumbo.jpg


“On the most extreme use of force — officer-involved shootings — we find no racial differences in either the raw data or when contextual factors are taken into account,”


https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w22399/w22399.pdf

Naturally, the fact-hating left got him fired.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/10/business/economy/roland-fryer-harvard.html

when a cop feels his life is threatened, he is most likely to shoot. obviously, if the bad guy shoots first, or attacks, or has a gun in plain sight, the cop could care less what color the guy is. but what is the rate of cops shooting black guys who were clearly no threat compared to white guys who were not? if there is no difference, why do we not see more cops being at least suspended for blowing away some white guy who is not a threat?
 
when a cop feels his life is threatened, he is most likely to shoot. obviously, if the bad guy shoots first, or attacks, or has a gun in plain sight, the cop could care less what color the guy is.

Is that based on an empirical study of the available data, my little bitch?
 
Back
Top