NO Quid Pro Quo...
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
That's funny coming from a n-l that purposely chooses to kiss black ass.
Centerleftfl
Verified User
I love the idea that Schiff and Nancy are one foot in front of the other, subpoenas, requests, gathering docs, scheduling, interviewing, methodically, LEGALLY. Then more subpoenas, more requests, more interviews--'rinse and repeat, as necessary. And TRUMP is left pissing all over himself with only his Twitter finger to give him any sense of control.
Centerleftfl
Verified User
evince
Truthmatters
triggering russo bot holes makes them short out
triggering actual human American voters makes them want to vote
evince
Truthmatters
putin prefers his russo bot holes to be racists
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
I've already seen a few of them say that they never said there was no quid pro quo. We're living in 1984.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
a press conference was held to praise female astronauts and some stupid fuck tried to divert it to questions about whistleblowers?........you mean THAT diversion.......you sad little cunts are sick.......
Mulvaney went off message and accidentally told the truth. The reporter asked him if he knew what he was saying, that it was a classic quid pro quo, he said yes. That is how we govern. Reds do not know we have that on tape and on the internet. It really happened and is what he clearly said.
Can you imagine he tried to unsay it the next day, blaming news and interpretation? It was clear, simple and in English.
Can you imagine he tried to unsay it the next day, blaming news and interpretation? It was clear, simple and in English.
Same way it was the only factor when it came to your votes in 2008 and 2012. Why was it relevant then and not now, boy?
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Centerleftfl,
No problem. Just print up some T Shirts that say: "Get over it" and have a few chants at a rally - all fixed.
MULVANEY QUID PRO QUO'D ALL OVER HIMSELF and TRUMP YESTERDAY and then told us to GET OVER IT! Helllllooooo! I was driving down the road listening on Sirus going WTF. What the hell is Trump's IMPEACHMENT lawyers thinking and by extension (shouldn't be, but in this admin inextricably linked) the JUSTICE DEPT thinking right now? Soooo I get home and 'turn on the TV' and this is what they were thinking...
Trump's legal team is reportedly 'stunned' after Mick Mulvaney admitted to a quid pro quo
October 17, 2019
Alex Wong/Getty Images
Maybe there's a reason Mick Mulvaney's gig never went full time. The acting White House chief of staff admitted on Thursday the Trump administration had engaged in a quid pro quo with Ukraine, withholding aid from the country until its role in the 2016 DNC email hack was further investigated. But the rest of the Trump administration isn't being so forthcoming, with Justice Department officials brushing off possible roles in the exchange entirely.
"If the White House was withholding aid in regards to the cooperation of any investigation at the Department of Justice, that is news to us," a senior DOJ official Thursday. This comes after another DOJ official they "have no idea what [Mulvaney] is talking about."
But over on President Trump's personal legal team, things aren't going so well. "I think people are a bit stunned," one person familiar with the team's thinking . Another source called Mulvaney's briefing "not helpful," Trump's top attorney Jay Sekulow, meanwhile, "the legal team was not involved in the acting chief of staff's press briefing."
Mulvaney's shocking comments were briefly characterized as taking the impeachment inquiry "from very, very bad to much, much worse," House Intelligence Chair Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said Thursday. After all, "no quid pro quo" has been Trump's simple defense from the day his call with Ukraine's president was first made public. Kathryn Krawczyk
No problem. Just print up some T Shirts that say: "Get over it" and have a few chants at a rally - all fixed.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Centerleftfl,
I think that is wishful thinking.
It would be amazing enough to get enough of the Senate to vote to convict Trump.
Trying to sweep Pence out with the same broom is asking too much of the broom.
No mention is being made in the mainstream media about impeaching Pence.
I think that is wishful thinking.
It would be amazing enough to get enough of the Senate to vote to convict Trump.
Trying to sweep Pence out with the same broom is asking too much of the broom.
No mention is being made in the mainstream media about impeaching Pence.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hi Stretch,
Premature conclusion.
The House is currently building their case.
We are just going to have to wait to see what's in it.
Premature conclusion.
The House is currently building their case.
We are just going to have to wait to see what's in it.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Centerleftfl,
Totally agreed.
They've got a big one on the line and they know how to boat a fish.
One big frantic lunge is not going to do it. They know they have to follow the tried and true process. Trump is being worn down. So are his supporters.
Totally agreed.
They've got a big one on the line and they know how to boat a fish.
One big frantic lunge is not going to do it. They know they have to follow the tried and true process. Trump is being worn down. So are his supporters.
actually yes he did say that there was a quid pro quo but this is something educated people know so you need to go back in your mother's basement
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! There it is boys and girls............They still have to find something impeachable and BUILD A CASE"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Unbelievable! Idiots!
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Stretch,
It probably works to Dems advantage to have you underestimate them.
The impeachable offense is anything the House says it is, OK?
It's a political process. And it never needs to convince the die-hard Republicans who showed how little morals they have when they fell in line behind Trump. No, those die-hard always-Republican-no-matter-what people would never be convinced any Republican could do any wrong.
All we have to convince is the middle.
I think there should be a few million new T shirts and bumper stickers that say:
"What if HILLARY did that?"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! There it is boys and girls............They still have to find something impeachable and BUILD A CASE"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Unbelievable! Idiots!
It probably works to Dems advantage to have you underestimate them.
The impeachable offense is anything the House says it is, OK?
It's a political process. And it never needs to convince the die-hard Republicans who showed how little morals they have when they fell in line behind Trump. No, those die-hard always-Republican-no-matter-what people would never be convinced any Republican could do any wrong.
All we have to convince is the middle.
I think there should be a few million new T shirts and bumper stickers that say:
"What if HILLARY did that?"
“House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) on Friday defended acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney amid backlash over his remarks suggesting that Ukraine aid was connected to the president’s call for the country to launch a probe into Democrats.
McCarthy noted during a press conference that Mulvaney sought to walk back his remarks later in the day on Thursday, arguing the White House official "clarified his statement" and that he "takes Mick Mulvaney at his word for his clarification."
“I think Mick was very clear in cleaning up the statement, that there was no quid pro quo. Everybody has been investigated states, but more importantly, you have the transcript the proof,” the House GOP leader told reporters on Friday.”
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/...aney-amid-backlash-over-quid-pro-quo-comments
McCarthy noted during a press conference that Mulvaney sought to walk back his remarks later in the day on Thursday, arguing the White House official "clarified his statement" and that he "takes Mick Mulvaney at his word for his clarification."
“I think Mick was very clear in cleaning up the statement, that there was no quid pro quo. Everybody has been investigated states, but more importantly, you have the transcript the proof,” the House GOP leader told reporters on Friday.”
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/...aney-amid-backlash-over-quid-pro-quo-comments