No Perversion for 1st graders!

[Jarod]

You against lawyers making a buck?

off public servants... yes.

 

[Earl]

elaborate....

Well golly, "no" is not a polysyllabic word.

Google "no."

 

[Monad Portal]

off public servants... yes.

you're a total elitist trashbag.

 

[Earl]

The American people spoke in Virginia...loudly.

They demand input into their children's education including the teaching of perversion to kindergarten girls and boys.

 

[TOP]

Teachers won't need attorneys...but they have representation from the union if they need it...
the rules aren't difficult in the least...and if they're being broken now, just stop. Simple...
If there are no violations then there's nothing to worry about...

 

[Earl]

Teachers won't need attorneys...but they have representation from the union if they need it...
the rules aren't difficult in the least...and if they're being broken now, just stop. Simple...
If there are no violations then there's nothing to worry about...

Indeed.

Teachers for more than two hundred years have had no problems teaching Math, History, English, and Science.

It's only recently that some teachers want to teach the morality of sex and sexual perversion to six year olds.

Virginia and Florida have stopped this...many more to follow.

 

[Monad Portal]

Not in Florida.

And this statute went WAY too far. Every Teacher in Florida is going to have a lawyer on retainer. I have already spoken to a few of em about it.

and of course, as an officer of the court, you advise them to obey the law.

 

[Jarod]

and of course, as an officer of the court, you advise them to obey the law.

It was not about if they should obey or not.... It was how to protect themselves from lawsuits.

 

[Monad Portal]

It was not about if they should obey or not.... It was how to protect themselves from lawsuits.

isn't the easiest way to obey the law and not teach A CURRICULUM regarding sexual matters to eight and under year olds?

Does the possibility of obeying the law come up in your counsel?

are you gonna be telling them they can't define a woman and stuff? the overreaction that has been prophesied?

 

[Earl]

Summary Judgement...Jarod loses...again.

 

[TOP]

It was not about if they should obey or not.... It was how to protect themselves from lawsuits.

What would they have to worry about?

 

[Monad Portal]

What would they have to worry about?

you know, if they accidentally talk about their weekend......

lol

 

[Jarod]

isn't the easiest way to obey the law and not teach A CURRICULUM regarding sexual matters to eight and under year olds?

Does the possibility of obeying the law come up in your counsel?

are you gonna be telling them they can't define a woman and stuff? the overreaction that has been prophesied?

The law prohibits much more than teaching a Curriculum. You should read it. If you say anything that makes a kid or teenager uncomfortable they are enabled to sue.

 

[Jarod]

you know, if they accidentally talk about their weekend......

lol

You clearly have no idea what’s in the law.

What do you believe the law says?

 

[Monad Portal]

The law prohibits much more than teaching a Curriculum. You should read it. If you say anything that makes a kid or teenager uncomfortable they are enabled to sue.

so you support microaggressions against students?

 

[Jarod]

What would they have to worry about?

Having a student that claims you said something that made them “uncomfortable”.

 

[Earl]

They could sue before the Florida law, or their parents could.

If their suit has merit. They will prevail.

If not they won’t.

What could be fairer than that?

 

[Jarod]

so you support microaggressions against students?

I don’t even know what that means.

 

[Monad Portal]

You clearly have no idea what’s in the law.

What do you believe the law says?

one two buckle my shoe?

 

[Monad Portal]

I don’t even know what that means.

which word don't you know?