Is it the US or Trump? That is the unresolved question. Would they want to return to our pre-Trump status quo, or would they not trust America anymore,
Is it the US or Trump? That is the unresolved question. Would they want to return to our pre-Trump status quo, or would they not trust America anymore,
we can go full self sufficient.Some say the likelihood of America's Asian allies aiding the U.S.-initiated war against Iran and subsequent seizure of Chinese ships is currently very low.
Current geopolitical developments from late 2025 and early 2026 indicate that most major Asian allies, including Japan, South Korea, and Australia have explicitly issued statements distancing themselves from direct military involvement in the cowardly sneak attack on Iran.
They are also understandably considered to be very reluctant to offer any support to the aggressor Americans in any potential conflict with China.
America has apparently forfeited the goodwill of even their closest allies around the world by the vicious unprovoked nature of their brazen attack on Iran.
In March, after the U.S. and Israel had launched surprise attacks on Iran on February 28, the Trump administration requested that Japan and South Korea send ships into the war zone. Both nations declined. Likewise, Australia has expressed no interest in aiding the American thugs, either.
The scenario of the US Navy seizing Chinese ships at sea further complicates any possibility of allied support due to regional security fears. This means no port facilities for the piratical American navy, no access to air bases, (and no overflights) for the bullies in bombers.
Allies fear that aiding and abetting American aggression could trigger a nightmare scenario of a protracted conflict that forces them to choose between the U.S. and their largest trading partner (China).
Mutual defense treaties (like ANZUS or the U.S.-Japan Security Treaty are designed for defensive actions within the Pacific.
They do not legally obligate these nations to support offensive U.S. operations started in the Middle East or against commercial Chinese shipping.
In short, the U.S. currently lacks a "coalition of the willing" in Asia for this specific scenario. Most allies view a U.S.-led war in the Middle East as a strategic error that undermines their own safety against a rising China.
mark Carney eats balls.
I said shortly after Trump was elected, that the lies this man tells, even someday should he ever ventures into truth telling, it will never register or be taken seriously. Same with his shitting all over our allies. Now we're a nation isolated from the rest of the world, laughed upon and ignored. When the value of our currency starts to become a hindrance on the open market, we're really done. So far, kissing Trump's ring is all about the bengies, once Powel is gone, its gonna be a spiraling free fall of US currency's strong hold around the world. AND I AM NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER WRONG, EVER!!!Some say the likelihood of America's Asian allies aiding the U.S.-initiated war against Iran and subsequent seizure of Chinese ships is currently very low.
Current geopolitical developments from late 2025 and early 2026 indicate that most major Asian allies, including Japan, South Korea, and Australia have explicitly issued statements distancing themselves from direct military involvement in the cowardly sneak attack on Iran.
They are also understandably considered to be very reluctant to offer any support to the aggressor Americans in any potential conflict with China.
America has apparently forfeited the goodwill of even their closest allies around the world by the vicious unprovoked nature of their brazen attack on Iran.
In March, after the U.S. and Israel had launched surprise attacks on Iran on February 28, the Trump administration requested that Japan and South Korea send ships into the war zone. Both nations declined. Likewise, Australia has expressed no interest in aiding the American thugs, either.
The scenario of the US Navy seizing Chinese ships at sea further complicates any possibility of allied support due to regional security fears. This means no port facilities for the piratical American navy, no access to air bases, (and no overflights) for the bullies in bombers.
Allies fear that aiding and abetting American aggression could trigger a nightmare scenario of a protracted conflict that forces them to choose between the U.S. and their largest trading partner (China).
Mutual defense treaties (like ANZUS or the U.S.-Japan Security Treaty are designed for defensive actions within the Pacific.
They do not legally obligate these nations to support offensive U.S. operations started in the Middle East or against commercial Chinese shipping.
In short, the U.S. currently lacks a "coalition of the willing" in Asia for this specific scenario. Most allies view a U.S.-led war in the Middle East as a strategic error that undermines their own safety against a rising China.