No more Kneeling for NFL

Poor Fowl....the fifth meltdown today....:blowup::blowup::blowup::blowup::blowup:
Mighty fine work on that poll you linked to....socks to be you....Congrats. That's got to be some kind of record around here... For sure...
 
Last edited:
Hello Legion,

Originally Posted by PoliTalker:
"Is the NFL against equal rights for black people?"
Click to expand...

Legion said:
The race card. Don't leave home without it.
Click to expand...

In case you didn't realize, racial police brutality is what this whole thing is about.

Originally Posted by PoliTalker:
"Black people have a right to not get shot by police who fail to protect their lives. All lives matter."
Click to expand...

Legion said:
Yes. So?
Click to expand...

So black people are not being protected as well as white people. Some are dying because police treat them differently than they would whites.

Originally Posted by PoliTalker:
"Black people are not as safe as white people from police brutality."
Click to expand...

Legion said:
Is that a fact?
Click to expand...

Obviously one you either deny or really don't care about. But it is true despite what you believe. Walter Scott was no threat while running away but he was shot in the back by Michael Slager just for being black, apparently.

You know, the overall message I get from President Trump on this is that he thinks black people who demonstrate for civil rights are being unpatriotic. He wants everybody to pretend there are no problems, and certainly not speak up if there are. Why doesn't he address the civil rights issue of police brutality? That would be the right thing to do. Not denial or deflection.
 
PoliTalker said:
In case you didn't realize, racial police brutality is what this whole thing is about.
Click to expand...

It used to be. Now it's mostly about hating Trump, IMO.

PoliTalker said:
So black people are not being protected as well as white people. Some are dying because police treat them differently than they would whites.
Click to expand...

Is that so? Cite your evidence, if you have any.

PoliTalker said:
Obviously one you either deny or really don't care about. But it is true despite what you believe. Walter Scott was no threat while running away but he was shot in the back by Michael Slager just for being black, apparently.
Click to expand...

That's one example, and your claim is unsupported by any evidence. Post the proof. Don't tell me to "look it up". You made the claim.

PoliTalker said:
You know, the overall message I get from President Trump on this is that he thinks black people who demonstrate for civil rights are being unpatriotic. He wants everybody to pretend there are no problems, and certainly not speak up if there are. Why doesn't he address the civil rights issue of police brutality? That would be the right thing to do. Not denial and deflection.
Click to expand...

You hear what you want to hear. What you decide to infer from what you hear is your issue.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
That oppression thing -- lefties seem to have empathy for those who are the targets of oppression, like the ppl being brutalized by LEOs. Righties, on the other hand, don't even *see* oppression when it's right under their turned-up European noses. That is, of course, unless it's the courts telling Christians that they can't force their beliefs on the rest of us, and that they must cater to *all* customers even if their religion supposedly preaches that they can't serve this group or that group. Then it's not just oppression -- it's PERSECUTION. Yes, exactly like the Romans feeding them to the lions. But black ppl being shot by cops? Meh, just a thing.
Click to expand...

Exactly. Or being anti-abortion but not willing to help poor families who kept their babies.
 
Poor Chrisitecrite...another soul lost...no surprise, though....she'll learn, someday..they all do eventually....
 
christiefan915 said:
Aw topsy. ;)
Click to expand...

It's time to re-post this for better understanding of our pathetic and damaged toxic comrade.

A JPP Pocket Guide to ToxicTalk©

:) after every sentence = "I'm pretending to be happy. You're convinced, right?"
Teacher = Janitor and lunchroom dishwasher
Stalker = Anyone who shows up in the same thread as she does.
Obsessed = What everyone but she is
Sock = Anyone who doesn't slavishly agree with her
Blocked/Ignored = Cyber equivalent of covering eyes with hands but still peeking
Meltdown = The term assigned when she experiences frustration when once again someone successfully mocks her 7th grade antics; used at least once per day (see Projection)
Projection: Frequent assignation of her own characteristics and actions to others (see Stalker, Meltdown, Jealousy)
More Projection, above: "You emailed ____ for help" = What *she* does when someone is handing her her ass as usual
About spinsterhood: "We" = me n the hounds. Example: "We are going to ___" = Me and the dogs are going to ___.
Hobbies: "We're cooking ____ and ____ for us tonight" = Alpo again.
Family: "Husband" = Imaginary and Invisible Man.
Delusions: "We live in an affluent Jewish neighborhood" = Me and the dogs got a little shack with the back door hanging off and a tire in the front by the shanty porch
Exaggeration: "My sister is an attorney who lives in another state" = Who knew party organizer = legal eagle?
Pretend life: "For ___ (insert name of holiday here), we're going to ____" = Me and the dogs gonna sit at home by ourselves again, spiting on the Internet
Jealousy: "You're so jealous of me" = I'm so envious of you I am green as my favorite boyfr.... cucumber
 
Poor Fowl...another failed post from Amazon...lol
I think she's tired with that one at least a couple of dozen times....lol
Sixth meltdown today...:blowup::blowup::blowup::blowup::blowup::blowup:
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
It's time to re-post this for better understanding of our pathetic and damaged toxic comrade.

A JPP Pocket Guide to ToxicTalk©

:) after every sentence = "I'm pretending to be happy. You're convinced, right?"
Teacher = Janitor and lunchroom dishwasher
Stalker = Anyone who shows up in the same thread as she does.
Obsessed = What everyone but she is
Sock = Anyone who doesn't slavishly agree with her
Blocked/Ignored = Cyber equivalent of covering eyes with hands but still peeking
Meltdown = The term assigned when she experiences frustration when once again someone successfully mocks her 7th grade antics; used at least once per day (see Projection)
Projection: Frequent assignation of her own characteristics and actions to others (see Stalker, Meltdown, Jealousy)
More Projection, above: "You emailed ____ for help" = What *she* does when someone is handing her her ass as usual
About spinsterhood: "We" = me n the hounds. Example: "We are going to ___" = Me and the dogs are going to ___.
Hobbies: "We're cooking ____ and ____ for us tonight" = Alpo again.
Family: "Husband" = Imaginary and Invisible Man.
Delusions: "We live in an affluent Jewish neighborhood" = Me and the dogs got a little shack with the back door hanging off and a tire in the front by the shanty porch
Exaggeration: "My sister is an attorney who lives in another state" = Who knew party organizer = legal eagle?
Pretend life: "For ___ (insert name of holiday here), we're going to ____" = Me and the dogs gonna sit at home by ourselves again, spiting on the Internet
Jealousy: "You're so jealous of me" = I'm so envious of you I am green as my favorite boyfr.... cucumber
Click to expand...

:rofl2: Btw, what is "an affluent Jewish neighborhood", a restricted community?
 
christiefan915 said:
Exactly. Or being anti-abortion but not willing to help poor families who kept their babies.
Click to expand...

Like this?

Legion said:
Ever since the legalization of same-sex marriage in 2015, we’ve been seeing myriad broader implications from the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Obergefell. From wedding cake bakers to event planners, if you dissented you could have your livelihood taken from you.

Now, the inexorable logic of Obergefell is bearing down on religious organizations that do social welfare work, as conservatives predicted.

Last week, a group of foster families in Philadelphia asked a federal court to end a new municipal policy that prevents Catholic Social Services from placing children in foster homes.

Catholic Social Services is one of the largest and highest-rated foster agencies in Philadelphia, but because it adheres to Catholic teaching on homosexuality and does not place foster children in same-sex households, the City of Philadelphia is cutting them off.

City officials are doing this despite a massive shortage of foster families in Philadelphia.

Philadelphia will terminate its contract with Catholic Social Services at the end of June unless the agency abandons the Catholic Church’s teaching on marriage. Never mind that no same-sex couple has ever complained about Catholic Social Services, or that the agency refers couples with whom it cannot work to one of 26 other agencies in the region.

The only thing that matters to municipal officials in Philadelphia is that Catholic Social Services must abandon its deeply held religious beliefs.

http://thefederalist.com/2018/05/22/philadelphia-bars-catholic-social-services-serving-foster-children/
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top