no more denying 'slippery slopes', they DO exist

[USFREEDOM911]

If you had a pair that might pertain.

But you "essentially" have been admiring them.

 

[Русский агент]

 

[Truth Detector]

Reading comprehension and you, well they never met. Again at no point was I going near the Constitution or the second amendment let alone ANY amendment as something to negoatiate. I'm sorry you missed that. Sadly it happens more often than you may admit. It's okay there's classes or counseling for that.
See our nation is founded on the United States Constitution. It lays the foundation for the type of government we have, an adversarial type of government. One in which different sides come to the table with different
positions. Via the process of position, argument and negotiation we get new laws. No one side gets everything they want. The OP presented the postilion that it was a slippery slope because one representative, Nancy Pelosi has this position that always seems to move towards gun control. Others do not want gun control and there are positions between. Now see based on the Unites States Constitution things work best when differing parties do the hard work of creating legislation through all the processes involved in the legislative branch that again was explicitly spelled out in the document. If done properly no one gets everything they want, they get what the negotiated consensus prevails, as the Structure of the Constitution frames. That I had to explain that to you is why:

A. You have no reading comprehension AND
B. Need to move up from sucking the short bus exhaust to actually getting to sit in the back. One day you might even make it to the front. To get there though you'll either need a class or a life coach.

I get that sheep can only think, respond and see the world in group think, like yourself. It's sad but you do it well. Good for you, at least you do something well. Regretfully I'm afraid at this stage it's impossible for you to observe past the sheep asses in your face. See, I am an individual that chooses to ignore labeling. I leave that for people like you who are still trying to figure out why square pegs don't fit in round holes. Again might be advisable to let go of the tail pipe.

Good luck with that.

Based on your responses it's clear you do.

It's almost like that's branded on your forehead or something.

Translation:

 

[Truth Detector]

I would think not for me or for you. We vote our representatives & they vote to make laws. If we do not like them we vote in representatives that will work to change the laws. That's how it works, how it's historically worked and how it's supposed to work.
Of course certain interests have come between that core principle but everyone's too busy being sucked into the 'my party vs' your party' to focus on the real problem with our political process.

Dear idiot; the second amendment cannot be rescinded by congressional legislation.

You really are too stupid for words; the irony here is you foolishly believe you have a brain. THAT'S funny!

 

[Truth Detector]

JABBA THE BUTT ​

Man Mountain Michael Moore admits that liberals want to repeal the Second Amendment.

Taking to Facebook in the aftermath of the Las Vegas shooting, Moore penned a lengthy post laying out his "proposal" to rid us of our right to bear arms.

"I, Michael Moore, along with all who support an end to this epidemic of gun violence, propose a new Amendment to our Constitution that repeals the ancient and outdated 2nd Amendment (which was written before bullets and revolvers were even invented), and replaces it with a new 28th Amendment that guarantees everyone the right to be free of, and protected from, gun violence," wrote the morbidly monstrous meatbag Moore.

According to the mammoth Moore, "the public’s safety comes ahead of an individual’s right to own and fire a gun. Believing that having a gun in your home provides you with protection is an American myth."

http://www.dailywire.com/news/21943/michael-moore-calls-repeal-outdated-2nd-amendment-amanda-prestigiacomo#

Someone with crayons will need to explain this to Clownonapost and what "slippery slope" means.

 

[Truth Detector]

Or we just say no. No compromise on the 2nd Amendment

Clownonapost thinks this debate is about legislation. He really is that laughably stupid.

 

[Truth Detector]

Of course they exist. Lots of logical fallacies exist. Most of which are enthusiastically embraced by conservatives.

Translation of someone trying to prove he is an idiot:

 

[Truth Detector]

You get me thinking. Do you know a state in this country that has gotten rid or ignored the second amendment? Is there one where there are no guns at all?

You live in a cave don't you? The ONLY thing preventing a complete ban on weapons is marginalizing the idiots you would vote for.

Dunce.

 

[Truth Detector]

Of course, suicide with a gun is neither violent nor leads to a death.

You're a fan of Clownonapost I bet!

 

[blackascoal]

 

[dukkha]

 

[cancel2 2022]

If you had a pair that might pertain.

Buckly is a low hanging fruit.

 

[crowonapost]

Dear idiot; the second amendment cannot be rescinded by congressional legislation.

You really are too stupid for words; the irony here is you foolishly believe you have a brain. THAT'S funny!

When you keep saying things like idiot then think you are saying something, I never said, there is only one calling the Kettle black.
To help educate the tail pipe sucking short bus set, here's an article from a conservative on the very things I'm talking about.


Let's be honest about the Second Amendment

None of this should actually be a problem for gun fanatics. They are free to make any arguments they wish in favor of their pet cause. But they cannot, if they are being intellectually honest, pretend that their opponents lose automatically because of the Second Amendment. According to our constitutional settlement, the question of what, if any, regulations should govern the private ownership and use of machine guns, pistols, javelins, nunchaku, rapiers, catapults, and nuclear warheads is one that is left to the prudence of our democratically elected legislators at the local, state, and federal level.

Again that was from a conservative. You assume things, lack reading comprehension, probably don't listen & ONLY think what's in your preconceived head about the 'other' is all that matters. Ironically you are one of the problems of our country you fail to read, comprehend or listen to the core of our country and it's people, conversation.

 

[Truth Detector]

When you keep saying things like idiot then think you are saying something, I never said, there is only one calling the Kettle black.
To help educate the tail pipe sucking short bus set, here's an article from a conservative on the very things I'm talking about.


Let's be honest about the Second Amendment

This clown isn't remotely connected to conservatism. It is your typical and laughable leftist screed that laughably begins with "lets be honest" which is always a hint that the author is being, well, less than honest while suggesting that Government already has the military thing covered and subtly argues that police keep us safe.

BUT, that is not the primary intent of the second amendment which is why you are a clownonapost who stupidly presumes you have even the slightest clue of what you whine about.

You couldn't educate a second grader with this bullshit. The true intent is to prevent a tyrannical Government from ruling over the people. Read, become slightly better informed dunce:

So what is a militia as defined by the Founders? Mason said they were “the whole people, except for a few public officials.”

In fact, there was a universal acceptance among both federalists and anti-federalists as to the importance of the right to bear arms.

Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist 28 that “if the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense,” a right which he declared to be “paramount.”

And then there is clause “shall not be infringed.” There is no exception to this contained anywhere in the amendment.

Zacharia Johnson, a delegate to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, summed up the meaning of the Second Amendment when he declared that “The people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possession of them.”

Full possession. Not some. Not most. Full possession of their weapons. The feds were to keep their hands off entirely.

http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2014/09/22/2nd-amendment-original-meaning-and-purpose/

Again that was from a conservative.

This dumbass isn't a conservative by any stretch of the imagination. PROVE it by linking us to something that suggests this twit is a conservative. What is apparent, much like you, is that he doesn't have the slightest clue of the intent of the Constitution. Like many liberal clowns on the left, he wishes to PRESUME what the founders meant without any honest research regarding it and comes to the same moronic conclusion that many on the left come to; that the means the military.

You assume things, lack reading comprehension, probably don't listen & ONLY think what's in your preconceived head about the 'other' is all that matters. Ironically you are one of the problems of our country you fail to read, comprehend or listen to the core of our country and it's people, conversation.

Wrong again shit-for-brains; it is YOU who wishes to ASSume things and lack basic comprehension and then source out morons on the left who write about things they know nothing about to support your moronic conclusions.

Get back to me when you actually grow a brain and have the resources to debate me.

 

[Truth Detector]

^Gets it; something Clownonapost cannot possibly comprehend at his current low IQ level.