No More AFFIRMATIVE Action

Obama proves that it can be done without Affirmative action ???

Well now, we don't know that for sure, ya know.....all those records that might tell us something about Obama are in "the vault".....
The $5 million to any Obama charity offer from Donald Trump and the Prez still would not produce the records. That should tell The American People that there is something fishy in Denmark, but of course, the airheads who voted for him do not give a sheet about anything, just their freebees. This country is going to POT, pun intended.
 
I just asked what you meant by your comment.

I also wonder how come you didn't keep your word and leave?
Take a guess what I meant, you Gravitasless Lib Demos are such morons that you cannot see something that is RIGHT in front of your face. I bet that if I put some hair around it, you would find it Touche...Ja Ja Ja(Spanish for Ha Ha Ha)
 
affirmative action had its time and place. it is no longer necessary.
Well, I know of some very qualified people who lost out to affirmative action, one trying to get into Cal State Pomona, he was basically told so, but I believe it was the Asian representation quota. Here it is from Wikipedia: "Affirmative action, known as positive discrimination in the United Kingdom, refers to policies that take factors including "race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or national origin"[1] into consideration in order to benefit an underrepresented group "in areas of employment, education, and business",[2] usually justified as countering the effects of a history of discrimination"
In other words whitey is getting screwed by the Lib Girleymen, and their multifactor cohors.
 
Well, I know of some very qualified people who lost out to affirmative action, one trying to get into Cal State Pomona, he was basically told so, but I believe it was the Asian representation quota. Here it is from Wikipedia: "Affirmative action, known as positive discrimination in the United Kingdom, refers to policies that take factors including "race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or national origin"[1] into consideration in order to benefit an underrepresented group "in areas of employment, education, and business",[2] usually justified as countering the effects of a history of discrimination"
In other words whitey is getting screwed by the Lib Girleymen, and their multifactor cohors.

Key word "underrepresented".
 
Well, I know of some very qualified people who lost out to affirmative action, one trying to get into Cal State Pomona, he was basically told so, but I believe it was the Asian representation quota. Here it is from Wikipedia: "Affirmative action, known as positive discrimination in the United Kingdom, refers to policies that take factors including "race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or national origin"[1] into consideration in order to benefit an underrepresented group "in areas of employment, education, and business",[2] usually justified as countering the effects of a history of discrimination"
In other words whitey is getting screwed by the Lib Girleymen, and their multifactor cohors.

i don't think 'whitey' is getting screwed....but i do believe AA is a policy that hurts this country more than it helps. it places a certain class of people in a separate group. this policy was needed in the past, however, today, it is no longer needed. this country needs to stop being so racially sensitive and accept all people of all colors as american.
 
This all stems from when you were in the hospital in the army! She'll shock much!
Folks, first read this incoherant sheet from Dudette above"She'll shock much!" and then you will have witnessed just exactly why SJJRSJJS(yours truely) feels the need to cyber lobotomize these Lib Demos who are really mostly retards and cretins. I mean does Dudette really make sense, and that folks is why I feel obligated to either cyber skewer most Lib Demos or like in the case of the Dudette, I do my thing on Dudettes basically hollow gord, I allow a few Lib Demos to skate, as they say, because I like playing with them, making them grovel, put them on a leash, go step and fetch it fool......Ja Ja J Je Je Jo Jo(Spanish for Ha Ha He He Ho Ho)
 
is this an example of meaningful discourse from the left?

if so

LMAO

If you act like an idiot there is no use talking to you. I asked a question, two actually and got an idiotic answer, so I'm done with him.

I'll ask you then, why do you think there is no longer any need for AA?
 
If you act like an idiot there is no use talking to you. I asked a question, two actually and got an idiotic answer, so I'm done with him.

I'll ask you then, why do you think there is no longer any need for AA?

as i've explained before...the need no longer arises. the country, by and large, is no longer the racist country we were 40 or so years ago. racism still exists, but it is no longer prevalent enough to warrant giving a certain class of citizens special privileges.

we are all american and should all be treated equally under the law. AA does not treat people equally under the law.
 
Ok. You are an idiot too.

I'm running out of people from the right to have a meaningful discourse with.
It is your unlucky week, I am the creme de creme when it comes to turning Lib Demo morons everyway butt lose, and occasionally I bend one over the cyber barrel to make them say uncle. Keep stalking me, I am used to it, it is part and parcel of being me, and SJJRSJJS thrives on this sheet. I will retrain you, mold you to be one of my cyber slaves, how does that sound tio you. How is that for discourse? How did it feel, did it hurt much, I took it easy with you since it was your first time, you need to be broken in slowly, bring you up by hand until you beg me fo mo.....Ja Ja Ja
 
Cannabis, Fair enough,

AA wasn't intended to treat people equally under the law it was intended to level an unequal playing field. In my opinion it was a bone thrown by Nixon to appease the black population to help ease the strife that was the late '60's early '70's. It only really affects the public sector, the private sector has always been free to discriminate unless they were government contractors.

I think it has run its course as well. There is nothing anyone can do about any private sector discrimination. And it isn't that prominent any more. Isn't as prominent anyway.
 
Cannabis, Fair enough,

AA wasn't intended to treat people equally under the law it was intended to level an unequal playing field. In my opinion it was a bone thrown by Nixon to appease the black population to help ease the strife that was the late '60's early '70's. It only really affects the public sector, the private sector has always been free to discriminate unless they were government contractors.

I think it has run its course as well. There is nothing anyone can do about any private sector discrimination. And it isn't that prominent any more. Isn't as prominent anyway.

if there is racism in the private sector, you can sue for redress. not sure why you think there is 'nothing' anyone can do about private sector discrimination.

you're right about the unequal playing field, and as i explained above, i don't believe that field exists in a detrimental manner. sure, it exists in some small sectors, but if you want to count the public sector, i don't think it exists there in any measurable detriment that we need to give a class of people an advantage based solely on their skin color.
 
It means that the most skilled/quailied people, whether Black or White should be promoted. Exactly what do you want? We are tired of affirmative action, and it needs to be exponged, Obama proves that it can be done without Affirmative action, so let's sheetcan it. Let's hear your propaganda BS? Yelling racist will not help you dingbat.

If the deck is randomly shuffled, dealing from the bottom and top of the deck should produce equivalent results. If you specifically stash the aces in the top of the deck, you're doing it wrong.
 
If the deck is randomly shuffled, dealing from the bottom and top of the deck should produce equivalent results. If you specifically stash the aces in the top of the deck, you're doing it wrong.
I am trying to say that the total of people are represented by a stupid deck of cards, a list, a group, etc. In this case the better more deserving applicants for a job, based on merit, education, are at the top of the deck, stack, list etc, or even in a Mitt Romney binder. The cream always rises to the top. Aces are the best cards and they represent the cream, so I used them, not thinking about the cards being shuffled, why shuffle the deck when the cream/ace is on top...capisce? You might as well put the names into a hat and pick, is that what you want? If it is, then why even study, to go into a hat, and have some bleading heart Lib dummy pick out just anyone. The Libs won this political battle, but the Political war ain't over yet.
 
Back
Top