There was intent to harm the Congress people. The mob had expressed to do so. Should the officer have allowed the mob to go along?
"No Kings" Clown Show = overwhelmingly Disgruntled Old, WHITE Leftover Liberals
- Thread starter Grokmaster
- Start date
Now it isn't murder? Make up your mind.
If she was unarmed I would have the police arrest her. I certainly would not want the police to murder her.
Sure. You'll offer cups of coffee for everyone in your house. Brave.
BABBITT is dead and YOU SAID MURDER REQUIRED INTENT. I said Byrd INTENTIONALLY fatally shot her dead. By your own definition that is MURDER.
I think if the police was right there and armed they should be able to arrest a 5'0" 105# unarmed woman without killing her don't you think? I'd give her a Dr. Pepper probably instead of coffee.
You said Byrd panicked. That doesn't show intent.
You keep ignoring the elephant in the room. Why?
There is no elephant in the room.
Yes there is. The elephant is the mob willing to harm.
Panicked criminals frequently murder people. Are you saying they don't?
So why didn't the three armed cops behind her kill her. Oh that is right they weren't incompetent and they didn't panic
Byrd is not a criminal. Bad analogy.
Oh yeah they did notice her with all the chaos.
He is a murder.
Nope. It was defense. The best they could do is involuntary manslaughter.
They were right behind her. They didn't panic. They even tried to save her.Oh yeah they did notice her with all the chaos.
Who was he defending? Don't say the people in the House chamber because they could have left through the rear exit.
Ok. So there was nobody to defend? Is that your position?
Who was Byrd defending?