No fraud huh?

Stone said:
No fraud huh?
Click to expand...

Correct. Every judge that Rudy ridiculed himself before (and asking Trump to pardon him for perjury in Federal court) knows there was "no fraud".

Meanwhile, Mellissa Carone has replaced Sarah Palin as my favorite modern Republican woman. She's hotter than Sarah too!

36416968-9015555-image-a-30_1607028307651.jpg
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
He has stated that he is a "chemist." 1) In the UK, a chemist is a druggist, pharmacist, or pharmacy tech. 2) My father was a chemist, yet he would have never claimed to have any special expertise in any other field of science. My oldest son and my husband are also sci-guys: engineers. Once again, they would never claim to have any expertise in any other branch of engineering other than their own.

But the #1 reason why we know Tom is not a scientist? Because scientists formulate hypotheses, then collect data seeking to either confirm or deny the hypothesis. They then share results with other men/women in the field who then attempt to either validate or invalidate the conclusions reached. Tom comes up with a preconceived bias, then scours the web for discredited scientists and non-scientists to confirm his bias, then insists that he's right and everyone else is wrong.
Click to expand...

You remind me very much of the mean bitch Christie Masters in Romy and Michelle's High School Reunion.

I did a pure chemistry degree and gained a 2:1 honours. I seem to recall that Snarla tried that same tactic as well. If you don't know the difference between chemistry and pharmacology then that says much about you. I also recall that Micawber tried to say that there was no such thing as pure chemistry, the prick wouldn't accept it. I had to show him courses on UK university websites before he'd back down. Even then he churlishly said that they don't have that in the US, you just can't make it up.

I was having a heated discussion about Representative Concentration Pathways a couple of weeks ago with Diesel. He was getting irate and saying I didn't know what I was talking about, but then backed down and apologised when it became obvious to him that I did. We decided that the most likely scenario is RCP2.6. Of course I'm well aware that you don't understand any of this but that's par for the course, stick to dogfish dissection.
 
Last edited:
Dutch Uncle said:
The Bat Signal? WTFO?
Click to expand...

Yes, notice how the victim's posse finally showed up, gave a half-hearted defense, and went off to watch more football? :rofl2:

I see Tom finally got done cleaning the public urinals and is back home and ready to play Spiteful Old Geezer again.
 
Primavera said:
I did a pure chemistry degree and gained a 2:1 honours. I seem to recall that Snarla tried that same tactic as well. If you don't know the difference between chemistry and pharmacology then that says much about you. I also recall that Micawber tried to say that there was no such thing as pure chemistry, the prick wouldn't accept it. I had to show him courses on UK university websites before he'd back down. Even then he churlishly said that they don't have that in the US, you just can't make it up.

I was having a heated discussion about Representative Concentration Pathways a couple of weeks ago with Diesel. He was getting irate and saying I didn't know what I was talking about, but then backed down and apologised when it became obvious to him that I did. We decided that the most likely scenario is RCP2.6. Of course I'm well aware that you don't understand any of this but that's oar for the course.
Click to expand...

Did you do chemistry or did chemistry do you?
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Yes, notice how the victim's posse finally showed up, gave a half-hearted defense, and went off to watch more football? :rofl2:

I see Tom finally got done cleaning the public urinals and is back home and ready to play Spiteful Old Geezer again.
Click to expand...

Do you think they are doing it for the PM pix?
 
christiefan915 said:
Are you afraid to address her directly? Sorry, snowflake.... :laugh:
Click to expand...

Ive told you many times that in general, in England anyway, men don't call women cunts. It's primarily directed at other men. I've only ever called two women on here cunts, one being Snarla for calling me a potential rapist and the Madwitch Cuckoo for being a total hypocrite.

That's certainly not true in Ireland or indeed Australia, in fact in Aussie it's an all purpose word.

https://youtu.be/mETk2181uxo
 
Last edited:
ThatOwlWoman said:
Yes, notice how the victim's posse finally showed up, gave a half-hearted defense, and went off to watch more football? :rofl2:

I see Tom finally got done cleaning the public urinals and is back home and ready to play Spiteful Old Geezer again.
Click to expand...

Yes definitely Christie Masters without a doubt! So says the nasty old buzzard covered in owl crap most of the time!

If you must know we are currently in Southern Thailand whilst you're freezing your tits off on Lake Inferior.

Currently in Phang Nga Bay if you give me an address I'll send a 'glad you're not here' postcard to Lake Inferior.

https://www.phuket101.net/phang-nga-bay/
 
Last edited:
ThatOwlWoman said:
Yes, notice how the victim's posse finally showed up, gave a half-hearted defense, and went off to watch more football? :rofl2:

I see Tom finally got done cleaning the public urinals and is back home and ready to play Spiteful Old Geezer again.
Click to expand...

tumblr_mltlqjmOq91qb8uexo1_r1_500.gif
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
He has stated that he is a "chemist." 1) In the UK, a chemist is a druggist, pharmacist, or pharmacy tech. 2) My father was a chemist, yet he would have never claimed to have any special expertise in any other field of science. My oldest son and my husband are also sci-guys: engineers. Once again, they would never claim to have any expertise in any other branch of engineering other than their own.

But the #1 reason why we know Tom is not a scientist? Because scientists formulate hypotheses, then collect data seeking to either confirm or deny the hypothesis. They then share results with other men/women in the field who then attempt to either validate or invalidate the conclusions reached. Tom comes up with a preconceived bias, then scours the web for discredited scientists and non-scientists to confirm his bias, then insists that he's right and everyone else is wrong.

g2DGWaA.jpg
Click to expand...

Primavera said:
You remind me very much of the mean bitch Christie Masters in Romy and Michelle's High School Reunion.

I did a pure chemistry degree and gained a 2:1 honours. I seem to recall that Snarla tried that same tactic as well. If you don't know the difference between chemistry and pharmacology then that says much about you. I also recall that Micawber tried to say that there was no such thing as pure chemistry, the prick wouldn't accept it. I had to show him courses on UK university websites before he'd back down. Even then he churlishly said that they don't have that in the US, you just can't make it up.

I was having a heated discussion about Representative Concentration Pathways a couple of weeks ago with Diesel. He was getting irate and saying I didn't know what I was talking about, but then backed down and apologised when it became obvious to him that I did. We decided that the most likely scenario is RCP2.6. Of course I'm well aware that you don't understand any of this but that's par for the course, stick to dogfish dissection.
Click to expand...

Hate to tell you be she is correct.
In British English (and to some extent Australian English), the professional title known as "pharmacist" is also known as "dispensing chemist" or, more commonly, "chemist".

Pharmacist - Wikipedia
Click to expand...
 
TOP said:
I suggested doing that pages ago....you and others chose to not do so....
I'm not participating in any feud, as I told you before....
Click to expand...

Soooo, like Trump, you take no responsibility for your actions. Sad.
 
TOP said:
Why would I take "responsibility" for "Actions"/"things" I've not done...or things not true? Don't be silly;)
Click to expand...

You shouldn't. You should just take responsibilitly for your own actions, both overt or covert. It's a matter of honesty.

Example, if you sent me nudie pix through PM like it's been rumored you've sent to many other men on this forum, it would be against the rules for me to post about the pix or even announce that you'd sent them to me as a bribe for support. <--theoretical example. I'm not confirming or denying this happened.
OTOH, it would be responsible of me to mention to newbies to watch out for PMs from you . :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top