Please post to all when you've replied. Yes, the ball is in your court.
Did you use the info you got to look up my credentials? Yes or No....?
I don't need an apology, btw. And I don't lie....I don't need to
Please post to all when you've replied. Yes, the ball is in your court.
They're doing it up bigtime todayThis is fascinating reading these last few pages. HOLY SHIT!! You people REALLY ARE crazy. My advice to some of you is that you ahhhhhhhhhhh,.....REALLY need to get out more. There is a whole big world out there to enjoy,....why on Earth would you spend that much time living on your computer, its insane.

This is fascinating reading these last few pages. HOLY SHIT!! You people REALLY ARE crazy. My advice to some of you is that you ahhhhhhhhhhh,.....REALLY need to get out more. There is a whole big world out there to enjoy,....why on Earth would you spend that much time living on your computer, its insane.
So, you're posting on a message board, on a thread you started, to tell people not to post on a message board so much.
Makes sense.
Sorry about that...I'm asking we move the weirdness to the TDS thread....where it belongsYou know what Im talking about so dont play that little game. I dont spend anywhere near the time in here that a lot of people do. All kidding aside,....yeah,...its weird.
You know what Im talking about so dont play that little game. I dont spend anywhere near the time in here that a lot of people do. All kidding aside,....yeah,...its weird.
Sorry about that...I'm asking we move the weirdness to the TDS thread....where it belongshttps://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?101285-TOP-Derangement-Syndrome/page1313
I replied to all Three, as you requested....TOP provided two posts. Unfortunately, there's no date on them and, although I don't have copies in my files, I cannot prove they aren't mine. As such, I apologize to TOP about not remembering the two PMs and consider that she was correct in her claims of a PM exchange.
While I can't reveal her content, I can say it was in reference to her claims of being a teacher. Although I cannot tell if she initiated the exchange or if I did, it fits with what we'd been discussing in public several months ago. This is akin to my public posts: "What is the confirmation that you are a retired teacher?"
I replied to all ThreeYou sent the first....
SentI only counted two, but will take your word I sent the first one. What was the date on my first PM?
Sent![]()
No problem...I just wanted the record set straight....they're yours, after all....Apology not necessary, but accepted and appreciated....Got it. Thanks. Oddly, I have PMs both sent and received from others last April 19th, but not the ones you claim. Regardless, I apologized since I can't refute your evidence.
BTW, anyone know what two public events happened on April 19th in the last 30 years?
ROFLMAO!
IMHO, most cyberstalkers are just very, very lonely people. Loneliness + Alcoholism + Liberal state welfare checks = a lot of cyberstalking.
In the time it took you to post that reply, you could have replied to one of these mysterious PMs you claim exist. Why didn't you just reply to the PM?
Is it because you are lying again? Is it because nearly everything TOW has said about you is true and nearly everything you've posted is a big, fat lie?

My take on Toxic's desire to get personal info on her rivals was not so much evil intentions as it was the only way she could "win." She has always been one of those "I know something you don't know" types we all loved so much in 4th grade. You've probably noticed all her weird cryptic comments referring to things happening inside her head, hoping someone will ask "What's up with that?" So sprinkling little hints around that included ppl's real names, locations, places of employment, family members' names and so on is more of a power trip and a snide veiled threat. As I told her earlier today, she does nothing openly. She is the sneak-thief, the whiny victim who gets someone else (Tom, Earl, various Amazon ppl, etc.) to fight her battles for her. She's content to stay in the bushes, lobbing little firecrackers at the target until they confront her directly. Then THEY'RE the bully, not her. I'd called it fiendishly clever but it's really not. It's the cowardly tactics of a spineless forever-victim
affidavits are evidence.
How so? None of those "good points" are even remotely true...All good points. A lot of it points to "lonely". The compulsive need to feel superior is often due to a strong feeling of inferiority.
How so? None of those "good points" are even remotely true...
PS: You never did answer my question..did you or did you not, look up my teaching credentials using the cyberstalking/doxxing info you received?