No evidence of Sedition

LV426 said:
Just because no one has been charged with sedition YET doesn't mean those charges aren't coming.
Click to expand...

And yet, on another thread you and other Progressives here say there's no chance of voter fraud with mail-in balloting, ballot harvesting, etc....
 
T. A. Gardner said:
And yet, on another thread you and other Progressives here say there's no chance of voter fraud with mail-in balloting, ballot harvesting, etc....
Click to expand...

There isn't voter fraud with mail-in voting...we just went through an election where every single state certified their results.

THIS is actual election fraud:

 
Stone said:
Are you a grown man still hiding in your room crying for govt handouts while playing silly little video games that were intended for KIDS ? Do you wear the pussy hat with pride?
Click to expand...

At least I don't lie about myself on anonymous message boards to impress people I'll never meet.
 
LV426 said:
At least I don't lie about myself on anonymous message boards to impress people I'll never meet.
Click to expand...

qn50h.jpg
 
SmarterthanYou said:
https://thepostmillennial.com/doj-admits-theres-little-evidence-to-support-jan-6-sedition-charges/

As the trials get underway for those who participated in the Capitol riot of Jan. 6, it turns out that the charges against these defendants are not as serious as the public was initially led to believe. The Department of Justice has since said that a portion of the evidence is not actually quite as damning as was previously believed.

Reuters reports that none of those 400 who have been charged have been charged with sedition, which would be an incitement of rebellion. Instead, the most serious charge brought against any of the defendants has been assault. Two of the men who were charged with assault on Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick used bear spray in the attack.

Others have been charged with conspiracy, and obstruction. While five people lost their lives during the riot, only one was killed with a weapon, and that was Ashli Babbit, who died after being shot by an unnamed Capitol Police Officer. Sicknick was assaulted with bear spray, but died some time later and a cause of death has not been released. The other three suffered medical emergencies.

Michael Ferrara, an attorney with Kaplan Hecker & Fink, LLP, who was formerly a federal prosecutor, said that if it becomes clear that prosecutors overreached, engaged in hyperbole, of simply misunderstood social media and text messages, it would be no "small error."

In fact, Ferrara said, the prosecutors' zealotry could "color the way the judge see the case going forward," which would impact outcomes for defendants.

It was widely pushed in media after the Jan. 6 Capitol riot that those who engaged in the activity of disrupting congress were armed and violent and that senators and representatives feared for their lives. However, the investigation into the actions of that day have revealed that no one was armed with a fire arm, and the most egregious assault charges are against men who were armed with bear spray.
Click to expand...

I can recomend a good optometrist :laugh:
 
SmarterthanYou said:
https://thepostmillennial.com/doj-admits-theres-little-evidence-to-support-jan-6-sedition-charges/

As the trials get underway for those who participated in the Capitol riot of Jan. 6, it turns out that the charges against these defendants are not as serious as the public was initially led to believe. The Department of Justice has since said that a portion of the evidence is not actually quite as damning as was previously believed.

Reuters reports that none of those 400 who have been charged have been charged with sedition, which would be an incitement of rebellion. Instead, the most serious charge brought against any of the defendants has been assault. Two of the men who were charged with assault on Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick used bear spray in the attack.

Others have been charged with conspiracy, and obstruction. While five people lost their lives during the riot, only one was killed with a weapon, and that was Ashli Babbit, who died after being shot by an unnamed Capitol Police Officer. Sicknick was assaulted with bear spray, but died some time later and a cause of death has not been released. The other three suffered medical emergencies.

Michael Ferrara, an attorney with Kaplan Hecker & Fink, LLP, who was formerly a federal prosecutor, said that if it becomes clear that prosecutors overreached, engaged in hyperbole, of simply misunderstood social media and text messages, it would be no "small error."

In fact, Ferrara said, the prosecutors' zealotry could "color the way the judge see the case going forward," which would impact outcomes for defendants.

It was widely pushed in media after the Jan. 6 Capitol riot that those who engaged in the activity of disrupting congress were armed and violent and that senators and representatives feared for their lives. However, the investigation into the actions of that day have revealed that no one was armed with a fire arm, and the most egregious assault charges are against men who were armed with bear spray.
Click to expand...

The incitement was provided by Trump and the other speakers. This insurrection lays at his feet. Trumps army will spend lots of time in jail.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
something that most people should try to understand is how the law works

if someone is not charged and convicted as a traitor, they are not a traitor
if someone is not charged and convicted with sedition, they are not an insurrectionist

no matter how badly you want someone to be a treasonous individual, if they aren't convicted of treason, they are not guilty of treason

and last I looked, Joe or Kamala cannot bring charges, that is the job of the DOJ/AG............and if the evidence isn't there, then they are acquitted, or better, charges will be dismissed by that judge
Click to expand...

Right. I get it.
But you skipped the part about disappearing after the dismissal or acquittal.
First the legal process.
Then the executive decision.
Now you get it too.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
mmmm, get what? how easy is it for a former billionaire president to disappear?
Click to expand...

I mean disappearing in the Sicilian "legitimate businessman" sense.
That's the executive decision made after the dismissal/acquittal.
Did you grow up on a wheat farm?
Nothing wrong with that, but how else would you not know what I meant?
 
NiftyNiblick said:
I mean disappearing in the Sicilian "legitimate businessman" sense.
That's the executive decision made after the dismissal/acquittal.
Did you grow up on a wheat farm?
Nothing wrong with that, but how else would you not know what I meant?
Click to expand...

soy and corn, if that really matters. in my defense, the wide range or hyperbolic responses i've seen on here in the last couple of years lends itself to seeing alot of different meanings
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top