No evidence of Sedition

https://thepostmillennial.com/doj-admits-theres-little-evidence-to-support-jan-6-sedition-charges/

As the trials get underway for those who participated in the Capitol riot of Jan. 6, it turns out that the charges against these defendants are not as serious as the public was initially led to believe. The Department of Justice has since said that a portion of the evidence is not actually quite as damning as was previously believed.

Reuters reports that none of those 400 who have been charged have been charged with sedition, which would be an incitement of rebellion. Instead, the most serious charge brought against any of the defendants has been assault. Two of the men who were charged with assault on Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick used bear spray in the attack.

Others have been charged with conspiracy, and obstruction. While five people lost their lives during the riot, only one was killed with a weapon, and that was Ashli Babbit, who died after being shot by an unnamed Capitol Police Officer. Sicknick was assaulted with bear spray, but died some time later and a cause of death has not been released. The other three suffered medical emergencies.

Michael Ferrara, an attorney with Kaplan Hecker & Fink, LLP, who was formerly a federal prosecutor, said that if it becomes clear that prosecutors overreached, engaged in hyperbole, of simply misunderstood social media and text messages, it would be no "small error."

In fact, Ferrara said, the prosecutors' zealotry could "color the way the judge see the case going forward," which would impact outcomes for defendants.

It was widely pushed in media after the Jan. 6 Capitol riot that those who engaged in the activity of disrupting congress were armed and violent and that senators and representatives feared for their lives. However, the investigation into the actions of that day have revealed that no one was armed with a fire arm, and the most egregious assault charges are against men who were armed with bear spray.

Are you suggesting that these insurrectionists should be acquitted by the letter of the law and then somehow disappear after leaving the courtroom?
I don't quite get that from your post, unfortunately,
but I can't criticize it as a bad idea.
Joe might not have the balls, but I have faith in Kamela's man parts.
 
https://thepostmillennial.com/doj-admits-theres-little-evidence-to-support-jan-6-sedition-charges/

As the trials get underway for those who participated in the Capitol riot of Jan. 6, it turns out that the charges against these defendants are not as serious as the public was initially led to believe. The Department of Justice has since said that a portion of the evidence is not actually quite as damning as was previously believed.

Reuters reports that none of those 400 who have been charged have been charged with sedition, which would be an incitement of rebellion. Instead, the most serious charge brought against any of the defendants has been assault. Two of the men who were charged with assault on Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick used bear spray in the attack.

Others have been charged with conspiracy, and obstruction. While five people lost their lives during the riot, only one was killed with a weapon, and that was Ashli Babbit, who died after being shot by an unnamed Capitol Police Officer. Sicknick was assaulted with bear spray, but died some time later and a cause of death has not been released. The other three suffered medical emergencies.

Michael Ferrara, an attorney with Kaplan Hecker & Fink, LLP, who was formerly a federal prosecutor, said that if it becomes clear that prosecutors overreached, engaged in hyperbole, of simply misunderstood social media and text messages, it would be no "small error."

In fact, Ferrara said, the prosecutors' zealotry could "color the way the judge see the case going forward," which would impact outcomes for defendants.

It was widely pushed in media after the Jan. 6 Capitol riot that those who engaged in the activity of disrupting congress were armed and violent and that senators and representatives feared for their lives. However, the investigation into the actions of that day have revealed that no one was armed with a fire arm, and the most egregious assault charges are against men who were armed with bear spray.

200.gif
 
Are you suggesting that these insurrectionists should be acquitted by the letter of the law and then somehow disappear after leaving the courtroom?
I don't quite get that from your post, unfortunately,
but I can't criticize it as a bad idea.
Joe might not have the balls, but I have faith in Kamela's man parts.

something that most people should try to understand is how the law works

if someone is not charged and convicted as a traitor, they are not a traitor
if someone is not charged and convicted with sedition, they are not an insurrectionist

no matter how badly you want someone to be a treasonous individual, if they aren't convicted of treason, they are not guilty of treason

and last I looked, Joe or Kamala cannot bring charges, that is the job of the DOJ/AG............and if the evidence isn't there, then they are acquitted, or better, charges will be dismissed by that judge
 
so........a nothing burger? there is no 'there', there?????

Pretty much. Put it This way........if these goofballs thought THAT thing on the 6th was an insurrection then I cant imagine what they would think if they ever saw a real one. :laugh: Buncha scared little beta boys is what they are.
 
i get it. most people don't like having their failures shoved in their faces
LOL, it’s not a failure, another deflection. The fact is, not all of the people who participated have been charged. You are jumping the gun in declaring no one has been charged with sedition.
 
LOL, it’s not a failure, another deflection. The fact is, not all of the people who participated have been charged. You are jumping the gun in declaring no one has been charged with sedition.

I'm not jumping the gun, maybe the DOJ is..........you should give them some legal advice on how to prosecute people
 

That girl should be glad that most men do not believe in hitting a woman because THAT mug she has is one of the most punchable faces the world has ever seen. Only gonna get worse for her too as she ages....:laugh:
 
Pretty much. Put it This way........if these goofballs thought THAT thing on the 6th was an insurrection then I cant imagine what they would think if they ever saw a real one. Buncha scared little beta boys is what they are.

What happened in Cuba in 1959-60 was an insurrection.
 
first off, sure there is evidence of it. maybe you need to read the legal definition of sedition-

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

they seized control of the capitol by force. and other property therein. they have admitted, many of them, their goal was to overturn the election results that all 50 states had certified to.

slam dunk.

next question.
So those that have attacked the Federal Court house and tried to burn it down while it was occupied are guilty of sedition.
 
first off, sure there is evidence of it. maybe you need to read the legal definition of sedition-

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

they seized control of the capitol by force. and other property therein. they have admitted, many of them, their goal was to overturn the election results that all 50 states had certified to.

slam dunk.

next question.

Name someone out of the rioters on Jan 6 that was charged under that law. Here, I'll even help you by providing several lists with names and charges:

https://www.insider.com/all-the-us-capitol-pro-trump-riot-arrests-charges-names-2021-1
https://www.usatoday.com/storytelling/capitol-riot-mob-arrests/
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/capitol-breach-cases

Go for it. Let's see who got smacked down for 18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy
 
Name someone out of the rioters on Jan 6 that was charged under that law. Here, I'll even help you by providing several lists with names and charges:

https://www.insider.com/all-the-us-capitol-pro-trump-riot-arrests-charges-names-2021-1
https://www.usatoday.com/storytelling/capitol-riot-mob-arrests/
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/capitol-breach-cases

Go for it. Let's see who got smacked down for 18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy
Once, again, not all who participated have been charged. It is well known that the minor players were found and charged first. There are still cases being built.
 
Back
Top