No condoms for you!

AProudLefty said:
So you deny this is on his website?

Vote only for federal judges who understand that Roe and Griswold and Casey were wrongly decided, and that there is no constitutional right to abortion
Click to expand...

So you deny he said this?

"I don't support a state law or federal law that would ban or restrict contraception — period," Masters said in a statement emailed to Insider. "
 
ExpressLane said:
So you deny he said this?

"I don't support a state law or federal law that would ban or restrict contraception — period," Masters said in a statement emailed to Insider. "
Click to expand...

So you think he doesn't know what Griswold is about? I guess you think he's uneducated and dumb. You cannot have two contradicting positions at the same time.
 
The RvW decision, as written invalidates Griswald, Loving and Reproductive Health v CT.
 
AProudLefty said:
I am when it comes to my threads. I can ask mods to thread ban you if you don't stop. Please stay on topic.

This is about Griswold and Blake Masters thinking it was wrongly decided.
Click to expand...
Oh I'm scared now :laugh: :rofl2:

Like dissenting justice said . Griswold was Constitutional but the state law was silly. So it was wrongly decided.
 
ExpressLane said:
Oh I'm scared now :laugh: :rofl2:

Like decenting justice said . Griswold was Constitutional but the state law was silly.
Click to expand...

What makes you think I care about your feelings? :rofl2:

And WTF is "dsecenting"? :laugh:

Go back to remedial English class. Ask for your money back from your other teacher.
 
AProudLefty said:
Yes. What's wrong with that? It's not the first time others have done that.

If you want to talk about birth control vs. abortion, go make your own thread.
Click to expand...
If masturbation is an OK topic birth control vs abortion is OK too. At least my topic has something to do with birth control. And even you mentioned Roe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top