No Campaign Finance Violations by Trump

It's what you do when your case hilariously implodes in front of the whole world. Shift gears to un-related made-up BS accusations. :laugh:
 
It's what you do when your case hilariously implodes in front of the whole world. Shift gears to un-related made-up BS accusations. :laugh:

The collusion buggy has more gears than a Peterbilt lol.

Whatever Trump is ‘guilty of’ changes like the weather. Notice how none of them talk about obstruction any more. Today the Big Deal is the Flynn case but after it slowly dawns on them that Trump is unaffected by it, they will move onto the next Big Thing.

Which is never collusion. It’s like a kind of madness. Never seen anything like it
 
The collusion buggy has more gears than a Peterbilt lol.

Whatever Trump is ‘guilty of’ changes like the weather. Notice how none of them talk about obstruction any more. Today the Big Deal is the Flynn case but after it slowly dawns on them that Trump is unaffected by it, they will move onto the next Big Thing.

Which is never collusion. It’s like a kind of madness. Never seen anything like it


hen we released the first edition of this report in October 2017, the case that President Trump had obstructed justice was still in its relatively early stages. Even then, we concluded that there was substantial evidence that the president may have obstructed justice.

Evidence supporting the elements of that offense—an obstructive act undertaken with corrupt intent and having the requisite connection to a grand jury or congressional proceeding—was available in public reports and testimony.

In our view, the president’s then-known conduct, including his demand of loyalty from then-FBI Director Comey, his request that Comey “see [his] way clear” to letting National Security Advisor Michael Flynn go, his termination of Comey, and his other statements was similar to conduct that has previously supported federal obstruction charges and convictions.

Ten months later, as we release the updated second edition of the report, it has become apparent that the president’s pattern of potentially obstructive conduct is much more extensive than we knew.

To take only a few examples, it has since been reported that President Trump: attempted to block Attorney General Sessions’ recusing himself from the Russia investigation despite the AG’s clear legal duty to do so; asked Sessions to reverse his recusal decision; demanded and obtained the resignation of Sessions for his failure to contain the Russia investigation (before ultimately rejecting it); twice ordered the firing of Special Counsel Robert Mueller; dictated a false account for a key witness, his son Donald Trump Jr., of the June 9, 2016 Trump Tower meeting between campaign and Russian representatives; publicly attacked Special Counsel Mueller and key witnesses to the obstruction case; and has repeatedly disputed the underlying Russian attack and Vladimir Putin’s role in it despite possessing evidence to the contrary.

We also know that White House Counsel Don McGahn and his lawyer at one point were reportedly so concerned that the president was going to blame McGahn that he provided extraordinary cooperation with the special counsel, including sitting for 30 hours of interviews in an apparent effort to exonerate himself.

We also now have a better understanding of the conduct possibly implicating the president or those associated with him that he may have been trying to cover up. We know that there were more than eighty contacts between Russia-linked individuals and associates of the Trump campaign and transition team.

Since our last report, we learned that in April 2016, George Papadopoulos, a foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, met a Russian national who informed him that the Russians had “dirt” on Clinton. We have learned that Trump Campaign Chair Paul Manafort and his Deputy, Rick Gates, were in regular contact with a Russian oligarch with ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin throughout the Summer of 2016.

continued


https://www.brookings.edu/research/...stice-the-case-of-donald-j-trump-2nd-edition/
 
No one can ever explain to me how Mullet can go after Trump on obstructing justice when there’s a staggering conflict of interest between Comey-Mullet and the fact Rosenstein wrote the fricking memo to Trump—in which, Rosenstein recommended that Trump fire Comey.

Maybe you can give it a shot.
 
No one can ever explain to me how Mullet can go after Trump on obstructing justice when there’s a staggering conflict of interest between Comey-Mullet and the fact Rosenstein wrote the fricking memo to Trump—in which, Rosenstein recommended that Trump fire Comey.

Maybe you can give it a shot.

Rosenstein confirmed to lawmakers that he learned of Trump's decision to fire Comey one day before writing the memo outlining his perceived misconduct.
 
No one can ever explain to me how Mullet can go after Trump on obstructing justice when there’s a staggering conflict of interest between Comey-Mullet and the fact Rosenstein wrote the fricking memo to Trump—in which, Rosenstein recommended that Trump fire Comey.

Maybe you can give it a shot.

Brookings Institute explains it at the link above. You just won't read it.

Rosenstein knew before he wrote his controversial memo that ...

Senators said after the briefing that Rosenstein knew Comey was going to be fired before he wrote the memo. (May 18, 2017)

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news...osenstein-senate-comey-firing-0518-story.html
 
Rosenstein confirmed to lawmakers that he learned of Trump's decision to fire Comey one day before writing the memo outlining his perceived misconduct.

Yet, Rosenstein recommended that Comey be fired.

Didn’t Rosenstein make the decision to appoint Mullet? And did he not oversee the investigation till just recently?

Just for giggles, what WOULD comprise a conflict of interest in the investigation?
 
Yet, Rosenstein recommended that Comey be fired.

Didn’t Rosenstein make the decision to appoint Mullet? And did he not oversee the investigation till just recently?

Just for giggles, what WOULD comprise a conflict of interest in the investigation?

AFTER the FACT.. are you in such blind denial?

Rosenstein PROSECUTED the Mikerin case so he KNEW about Uranium One and you persist with your misinformation.
 
Yet, Rosenstein recommended that Comey be fired.

Didn’t Rosenstein make the decision to appoint Mullet? And did he not oversee the investigation till just recently?

Just for giggles, what WOULD comprise a conflict of interest in the investigation?

Sessions has a number of conflict of interest issue.. environmental clean up, for profit prisons etc..

and this:


In January, Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) asked Sessions for answers to written questions. “Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?” Leahy wrote.

Sessions responded with one word: “No.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...ns-is-in-deep-trouble/?utm_term=.7aaccd2d20e2
 
The collusion buggy has more gears than a Peterbilt lol.

Whatever Trump is ‘guilty of’ changes like the weather. Notice how none of them talk about obstruction any more. Today the Big Deal is the Flynn case but after it slowly dawns on them that Trump is unaffected by it, they will move onto the next Big Thing.

Which is never collusion. It’s like a kind of madness. Never seen anything like it

It isn’t just the collusion lie that has gears. We are witnessing a soft coup against Trump since he won

I am truly ashamed of my country. My hatred of liberals/leftists/democrats has now exceeded that of stinking goat fucking, pedophile worshipping muslimes.

This is not hyperbole. This is not trolling. If I could, I would round up every leftist using voting record and would give three options

1) leave the country
2) live in concentration camp until you reform your ways
3) use your imagination

I never though I would witness what I am witnessing. People like the arrogant Comey don’t deserve to live. I hope MS13 breaks into his home and does unspeakable things to his wife and daughters and he lives the rest of his life in misery
 
Rosenstien PROSECUTED the Mikerin case for Fraud and Money laundering. Do you have the foggiest idea what that's about?

I’m not interested in your tangent lol.

I asked ‘what would comprise a conflict of interest in the Mullet investigation?’

Are you able to conceive of one?
 
Hardly a high crime or treason. Obama had a similar camp finance violation that was ignored by the MSM.
 
I’m not interested in your tangent lol.

I asked ‘what would comprise a conflict of interest in the Mullet investigation?’

Are you able to conceive of one?

Already posted.


Trump’s History of Campaign Finance Wrongdoing Destroys His New Defense

Trump says today that he doesn’t know campaign finance law. Donald Trump, the man who once bragged...

excerpt:

Donald Trump, the man who once bragged on national television in 2015 about his remarkable knowledge surrounding campaign donations, declaring, “I know more about contributions than anybody,” now has a brand new defense to his alleged federal election crimes: He suddenly claims to know nothing about how campaign donations work.

The problem with this defense, though, is this thing called “Google,” which details Trump’s long history of being investigated and even fined for violating campaign laws.

We heard this new defense on Thursday in response to Trump’s long-time lawyer Michael Cohen telling prosecutors that Trump directed him to violate federal campaign laws. Trump stated via Twitter, “I never directed Michael Cohen to break the law. He was a lawyer and he is supposed to know the law. It is called ‘advice of counsel.’” (It’s like the end of an episode of Law & Order when both suspects claim the other is the real ring leader.)


This may come as a surprise to some, but “advice of counsel” is an actual legal defense that people have utilized effectively to shield themselves from criminal liability, although it’s a longshot. But if Trump were to have any chance with this defense in a courtroom, he must show that in good faith he relied on his lawyer’s advice and had no idea that the conduct may have been criminal.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump...troys-his-new-defense?source=articles&via=rss
 
Hardly a high crime or treason. Obama had a similar camp finance violation that was ignored by the MSM.

I’m still trying to wrap my brain around Sullivan invoking treason.

Think about it: a federal judge threatened to charge a person [a war hero, no less] with a *capital offense*. And with absolutely no legal justification for it.

I’m literally speechless.
 
Back
Top