NO AMNESTY, Already had it in 1988

Ya know the thing that the wingnuts don't want to recognize about illegal immigration that just simply drives Latinos insane is that it takes two to tango. Without illegal employment where assholes exploit poor Latinos for substandard wages in shit jobs nobody else wants there is no illegal immigration problem. Amnesty has to be on the table. Even Reagan was smart enough to know that. That's why it was one of his last acts as President.

So we already did it once. Wasn't part of the Reagan deal more enforcement so that it wouldn't be a magnet for more illegals?

How did that work out?

Discuss.

Look if the majority of Hispanics were coming here to work hard, be independent and better their lives, demalquedacrats would be building s fence by hand.

There is nothing in the demalquedacrat platform that values hard work, individual initiative and self reliance
 
Tu Madre Cabron Ja Ja Ja, it is pendajo not bendajo, you baboso pinche Puto Cabron...Ja Ja Ja Ja. That name of yours "Mott the Hoople" alone shows me what a dumb sheet you really are. Also your misspelling of your own identity(baboso) further reinforces your image of a genuine estupido mamador....Ja Ja Ja
Este Cabron, Mitt Hoopla, sabe La pinche Verga
Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja
 
So we already did it once. Wasn't part of the Reagan deal more enforcement so that it wouldn't be a magnet for more illegals?

How did that work out?

Discuss.

Look if the majority of Hispanics were coming here to work hard, be independent and better their lives, demalquedacrats would be building s fence by hand.

There is nothing in the demalquedacrat platform that values hard work, individual initiative and self reliance
Yea well then explain how comes I make about ten times as much as you do as a fry cook? If you had the work ethic, individual initiative and self reliance to earn a graduate degree in the sciences, like I have, you wouldn't be competing with illigeal immigrants for shit jobs and bitching your trailer park GOP racist rhetoric would you?
 
Yea well then explain how comes I make about ten times as much as you do as a fry cook? If you had the work ethic, individual initiative and self reliance to earn a graduate degree in the sciences, like I have, you wouldn't be competing with illigeal immigrants for shit jobs and bitching your trailer park GOP racist rhetoric would you?

I see you can't answer the question regarding Reagan's first amnesty deal so you descend into ad hominem attacks. I know you demalquedacrats like you think you are intellectually superior to others, but the fact that you spout off like this shows your insecurity.

It is also very telling that you strut around here talking about how greedy the republicans are and that all they think about is money, yet ironically it is left wingers like you and who brag about much more you earn than others or how much more you make in the stock market. Don't you find that ironic? Do you know the definition of irony? Did they teach you that in your "graduate course"?
 
I see you can't answer the question regarding Reagan's first amnesty deal so you descend into ad hominem attacks. I know you demalquedacrats like you think you are intellectually superior to others, but the fact that you spout off like this shows your insecurity.

It is also very telling that you strut around here talking about how greedy the republicans are and that all they think about is money, yet ironically it is left wingers like you and who brag about much more you earn than others or how much more you make in the stock market. Don't you find that ironic? Do you know the definition of irony? Did they teach you that in your "graduate course"?
I did answer your question but since you have the typical GOP 6th grade reading level it's apparent you didn't understand what I wrote. Besides, my comment wasn't an ad hom. I'm simply pointing out that your bitching is psychological projection becuase you didn't have the work ethic, personal initiative and self reliance to obtain the educational level needed to learn a marketable skill. So now you're accusing people who do have those qualities and there fore earn substantially more than you do of lacking these qualities that you yourself lack. How do you explain that little gem of hypocrisy?
 
I did answer your question but since you have the typical GOP 6th grade reading level it's apparent you didn't understand what I wrote. Besides, my comment wasn't an ad hom. I'm simply pointing out that your bitching is psychological projection becuase you didn't have the work ethic, personal initiative and self reliance to obtain the educational level needed to learn a marketable skill. So now you're accusing people who do have those qualities and there fore earn substantially more than you do of lacking these qualities that you yourself lack. How do you explain that little gem of hypocrisy?

It is amazing how you lambaste others of making assumptions, yet here you are casting aspersions on what you perceive to be a lack of formal education on the part of others. My guess is that you are very insecure about your own level of educational attainment.

It is also interesting to hear you talk about a "lack of initiative" and "self reliance". You are sounding like a conservative.

You speak to me like I am the 99% and you are the 1%. Well, by the arguments you posit in this forum, you are the one keeping me down. Your taxes need to be raised in order for me to have a chance. The argument liberals advance is that success has everything to do with LUCK and nothing to do with hard work. Remember, you didn't build that. You act like you got your education all on your own.

Did you take student loans from the government? Surely you didn't get there all on your own did you?

Now back to Reagan's amnesty program. The deal was to give amnesty to all of those who came here illegally after Kennedy weakened immigration enforcement in 1965 in exchange for better border enforcement. The argument against Reagan's amnesty program was the same as 1965 that it would be a magnet for illegal immigrants. We got the amnesty. What happened to the enforcement? How did we end up with 12 million more illegals? I thought it was supposed to be fixed.

Discuss
 
Why shouldn't I ask him what he would do about the children?

Since this was a discussion regarding illegals and it's already known that children born in the US are automatically citizens, why do you find it necessary to bring them into the conversation about illegals?
 
So the children should just be put into care or maybe left on the streets to fend for themselves?

You seem to find a lot to question and complain about, regarding illegals in the US; but the UK seems to be having it's own problems, that you might want to put your energy into solving.
 
No, he didn't. I asked him about the children and he just ignored it. So what are these strong opinions anyway? Are you advocating that they should be shot on sight?

yes. all illegal immigrants should be shot on sight and the cost of the bullet sent to their family.
 
Back
Top