If he didn't plan ahead? Yeah, that is his fault. I don't believe he is afraid and there has been no action that would be something to fault anyone for in regard to his fear. Let's put it this way, if he is "Kirked" it is the fault and action of the person who "Kirked" him. If he is simply afraid of it, then that is on him.
Gebus, are you not able to follow the conversation?
He was the last person Kirk interviewed on his podcast
Answer my question please.
The answer is in my original statement.
So how does a reporter add credibility to his report if he is too afraid to stand behind his own reporting?
And?
So the left should not be threatening to kill him correct?
I have answered that in my original statement.
Nobody should be threatening to kill him, but that doesn't change that poking the Mafia will put you in danger.
The left killed Kirk. The similarities between this kid a Kirk are interesting. They
I think he was matter factually talking about it not "crying" about it. I think he knew the risk and accepted it. He had security with him. I think him discussing his threats isnn't something lots of politicians have done when they are threatened. Having said that 23 year old kids are bullet proof in their own minds IMHO.
Most if not all, save for a few wanna be white minorities, with negro's included, most are white and its a fact most white people are violent. History has shown time after time after time, every single event of enslavement, territorial aggressiveness and evil, all were at the hands of white folk. Its even in the bible that when Cain murdered, he was marked with white skin.
07/13/2024.
Give me proof.
So prove it.
The military-industrial complex heavily influences both Republican and Democratic politicians, with the defense sector historically contributing slightly more campaign money to Republicans. Republicans generally tend to be more pro-military and advocate for increased defense spending, often linking it to national security and job creation in key states and districts.
Link?