Nick Sandmann's Lawyer Files $250 MILLION Lawsuit Against the Washington Post

Sirthinksalot said:
Show the post I made where I said Sandmann was suing the WaPo because he was approached by Nathan Phillips, illiterate.
Click to expand...

What’s wrong, bitch? Can’t read? Just go back a couple of posts to #93, moron.

Fake lawsuit. Laughable lawsuit. Frivolous lawsuit.

White and PERMANENTLY damaged. :rofl2:
 
Last edited:
you cant stand in public and be surrounded by others watching you and expect no one to comment on what you are doing



he has to prove he was SCARED of an old man drumming


anyone who sees the tape can tell he was completely ENJOYING what he was doing


the right will defend them because they want their children to be lying racists
 
domer76 said:
What’s wrong, bitch? Can’t read? Just go back a couple of posts to #93, moron.

Fake lawsuit. Laughable lawsuit. Frivolous lawsuit.

White and PERMANENTLY damaged. :rofl2:
Click to expand...

When a newspaper smears an innocent person, their reputation can be permanently damaged dumbfuck. You think every single person who saw the smear is aware that it was false? The false story is out there now, and can't ever be fully scrubbed from the internet.
 
evince said:
you cant stand in public and be surrounded by others watching you and expect no one to comment on what you are doing



he has to prove he was SCARED of an old man drumming


anyone who sees the tape can tell he was completely ENJOYING what he was doing


the right will defend them because they want their children to be lying racists
Click to expand...

He's not suing WaPo because he was scared you idiot.
 
Howard the Duck said:
Nope. Nick Sandmann would have to be a member of JPP for this to be a violation of 12b. If the post was extremely graphic, it would violate 12a, but, that's not the case here.
Click to expand...
The rule is clearly stated:
12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.
Click to expand...
lisasanders1964 said:
Can't wait to see the little snot go to jail when he gets caught raping a 12 year old.
Click to expand...
If lisasanders doesn't get banned the rule is not being applied in this case.
 
domer76 said:
Made up story? I saw the video of an old man and his tom tom approach a group of kids in a tense situation. I then saw a smirking little punk come out to stand in his way and his tomahawk chopping buddies right behind him. What video did you see?
Click to expand...

He didn't approach him from the video I saw.
 
TTQ64 said:
He didn't approach him from the video I saw.
Click to expand...

the drum group walked in between the kids and the idiots screaming at the kids to try and clam things down


the spoiled racist kids then pretended to get tuff the very people defending them

The SCHOOL IS TO BLAME for not taking care of the kids safety

but of course the kid wont SUE his school

he is GOING WHERE THE MONEY IS
 
You would have thought this religious school would have at least had the kids singing some peaceful religious song

BUT NO

they had them chant a FIGHT SONG
 
evince said:
the drum group walked in between the kids and the idiots screaming at the kids to try and clam things down


the spoiled racist kids then pretended to get tuff the very people defending them

The SCHOOL IS TO BLAME for not taking care of the kids safety

but of course the kid wont SUE his school

he is GOING WHERE THE MONEY IS
Click to expand...

The school didn't slander him. Those being sued did.
 
evince said:
the drum group walked in between the kids and the idiots screaming at the kids to try and clam things down


the spoiled racist kids then pretended to get tuff the very people defending them

The SCHOOL IS TO BLAME for not taking care of the kids safety

but of course the kid wont SUE his school

he is GOING WHERE THE MONEY IS
Click to expand...

The kids were in the way. They clearly were chastising the drum group.

Don't makes it seem if the drum group approached the kids first...…...even though that is the lie that will be told and he'll win. ……...just like Zimmerman
 
Howard the Duck said:
Nope. Nick Sandmann would have to be a member of JPP for this to be a violation of 12b. If the post was extremely graphic, it would violate 12a, but, that's not the case here.

The funny thing is that it makes a trollish defamatory comment about him, and the fake news media are basically getting sued for doing the exact same thing. Their coverage of him wasn't really much sanitized compared to this troll.
Click to expand...
you'd have to shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue to get banned here
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top