Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Now that's a hoot. He's another character that if Republicans would be stupid enough to nominate would guarantee an Obama re-election even if Obama turns into a George W Bush level of a fuck up. LOL
Yea right, coming from a guy who would have picked peanuts out of Bush's poop.Obama's already surpassed GWB level of fuck up. Where have you been, under a rock?
Yea right, coming from a guy who would have picked peanuts out of Bush's poop.
Give me a break. Obama hasn't even come remotely fucking close to being that level of a fuck up that W was. Hell he's spent most of his first two years having to dig us out of the deep dark hole that are W's fuck ups. Not even Jimmy Carter come close to W in the fuck up department. The only US President that can even be compared to W in the fuck up department is Warren G. Harding. Those two stand apart in their shining example of commitment to utter incompetence.
What you're actually suggesting in the perfect storm for the Republican party to permanently marginalize it self. Until leaders in the Republican party distance them selves from the reactionary right there going to be in the political wilderness for a long time to come.Its a "perfect storm" moment to field the most conservative candidates out there. Newt ain't in that field, IMHO.
I aint exactly ready to place him on a pedestal with Washington just yet. It hasn't even been two years and the man has had enourmous obstacles from his predecessor to deal with and though he's had some significant accomplishments, he aint exactly impressed. Having said that. I aint about to lump him in with W, Carter or Nixon yet either.Time is still on his side (meaning he still has more time to fuck up, versus not), but not for long Hoopy.
You would pick watermelon seeds out of Obama's poop and try to grow a tree...
Those Obama supporters are soooooo smert!![]()
What you're actually suggesting in the perfect storm for the Republican party to permanently marginalize it self. Until leaders in the Republican party distance them selves from the reactionary right there going to be in the political wilderness for a long time to come.
If the Republicans are serious about winning in 2012 then Mitt is the man. The sooner they can accept that fact and build up his political machine the better their chances are. Republicans need another ideological conservative like they need a hole in their head.
If I'm willing to consider voting for Mitt then there are a lot of other centrist willing to do that too but if you want 4 more years of Obama go ahead and fool yourself into thinking American wants another wingnut conservative.
Hell he's spent most of his first two years having to dig us out of the deep dark hole that are W's fuck ups.
Mott, I would like for you to answer a questions honestly please...
Can you cite some of these 'deep dark holes' that Obama has dug us out of?
Yea right, coming from a guy who would have picked peanuts out of Bush's poop.
Give me a break. Obama hasn't even come remotely fucking close to being that level of a fuck up that W was. Hell he's spent most of his first two years having to dig us out of the deep dark hole that are W's fuck ups. Not even Jimmy Carter come close to W in the fuck up department. The only US President that can even be compared to W in the fuck up department is Warren G. Harding. Those two stand apart in their shining example of commitment to utter incompetence.
Yea right, coming from a guy who would have picked peanuts out of Bush's poop.
Dixie, the country was in horrific shape when Obama took over.
and yet Obama managed to fuck it up even worse, didn't he......
a guy who can only pick peanuts out of Bush's poop will still be able to beat Obama in 2012.........Obama has fucked this country up more than all the presidents this country has ever had, combined......and he's accomplished it in only a year and a half......
I don't even know how someone who reads the news at all - even the most sporadic amount - could arrive at this conclusion.
We are most certainly not "worse" than we were in January of 2009. How could any intelligent person even make that kind of claim?
Here is an updated ranking of the 39 rankable US Presidents, as judged by me (Does not include Obama, the sitting president, nor does it rank Cleveland as two presidents. Also not included are WH Harrison, Taylor, and Garfield):
01. George Washington
02. James Monroe
03. Abraham Lincoln
04. Ronald Reagan
05. Dwight D. Eisenhower
06. Calvin Coolidge
07. Warren G. Harding
08. Chester A. Arthur
09. William H. Taft
10. George H.W. Bush
11. William J. Clinton
12. Benjamin Harrison
13. James K. Polk
14. Thomas Jefferson
15. Theodore Roosevelt
16. Millard Fillmore
17. William McKinley
18. John Adams
19. Gerald R. Ford
20. John Q. Adams
21. Franklin D. Roosevelt
22. Rutherford B. Hayes
23. Harry Truman
24. Grover Cleveland
25. John F. Kennedy
26. George W. Bush
27. James Madison
28. Martin Van Buren
29. Jimmy Carter
30. Richard Nixon
31. Lyndon B. Johnson
32. Woodrow Wilson
33. Andrew Jackson
34. Herbert Hoover
35. Andrew Johnson
36. Ulysses S. Grant
37. Franklin Pierce
38. James Buchanan
39. John Tyler*
Tyler is primarily ranked last because he committed treason by joining the Southern Confederacy and getting elected to its Congress. Any president who commits such an action should automatically be dropped to the bottom. Furthermore, he had a weak presidency, and he contributed to the decline of the Whig Party.