Newsom’s vow to appoint a Black woman to the Senate

QP! said:
The right has no clue what MLK stood for and believed and misstates his positions at every chance.
Click to expand...
What does this mean?

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. I have a dream today.
Click to expand...
 
TOP said:
The Biden Administration is the most unqualified in the history of the United States... the most diverse though so what does that tell you? How many examples do you need including the recent head of the FAA? Oh wait...
Click to expand...

He thinks you have to be a pilot to understand what makes an airplane spin. I guess all airplane designers are also pilots.
 
Diesel said:
Those segregationist Democrats became Republicans. And there the racists still reside.
Click to expand...

That is the Big Dem Lie.

Bigger than the Russian collusion Lie, and the Hunter laptop Lie by 51 former intel officers.
 
QP! said:
That is not how it works though, as that assumes there is always a singular 'best' for a job and that is just not the case.


For instances a goal of a job can absolutely rightly be to broaden the experiences within the company to include groups not represented prior. So a marketing company in the 50's who has a broad business selling across all segments might decide THEY would benefit from having more qualified women on their team instead of just the 50 white guys they currently have. What that DOES NOT mean, is that as they go out and seek qualified women candidates only, that those women are less qualified than any male candidate. It is likely there are numerous people with the qualifications and skill sets to do the job.

So for a company to go out and seek a woman as it will IMPROVE their business , by broadening the experiences of the team, is in no way something wrong to do.
Click to expand...

Next time you enter a surgical suite make sure you are content with the fact your doctor was hired for his/her/it's skin color and chosen gender, as opposed to skill at replacing your brain during the transplant.

I think otherwise and this is a perfect example of the idiotic "wokeness" running through our society. Take your ESG and equity and inclusion scores and shove them where the sun don't shine.

https://www.westernjournal.com/airl...ze-racial-quotas-qualifications-pilot-hiring/
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It is clearly both sexist and racist to proclaim that you will appoint someone based on gender and race to a position, whatever it may be. It is also likely, that Newsome's choice will be a lop retard of an idiot, much like Maxine Waters and Eric Swalwell, for example--they being from California also--are, among other Democrats.
Click to expand...

Indeed.

It also violates the Civil Rights Act to appoint someone based on gender or race.

Biden said he would only consider a Black woman for V.P., a clear vupiolation of the Civil Rights Act.

Black men and white men and women need not apply.

America started to decline when quotas were adopted by the far left Democratic Socialist loons.
 
The best example of how NOT to hire is very well represented in most of Brandon's cabinet pics. We can discuss "define a woman" later.
 
QP! said:
That is not how it works though, as that assumes there is always a singular 'best' for a job and that is just not the case.


For instances a goal of a job can absolutely rightly be to broaden the experiences within the company to include groups not represented prior. So a marketing company in the 50's who has a broad business selling across all segments might decide THEY would benefit from having more qualified women on their team instead of just the 50 white guys they currently have. What that DOES NOT mean, is that as they go out and seek qualified women candidates only, that those women are less qualified than any male candidate. It is likely there are numerous people with the qualifications and skill sets to do the job.

So for a company to go out and seek a woman as it will IMPROVE their business, by broadening the experiences of the team, is in no way something wrong to do.
Click to expand...

I understand the perspective but disagree.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
I understand the perspective but disagree.
Click to expand...

It is fine to disagree, but it is just not logical.

Today, if you are telling companies, 'i do not think diversity matters. I think you could keep your companies full of all white males like they were most in the 1950's and it would have no impact on your business', well ...that is just naive.

Companies sell to women and minorities too and having them on the team and inputting what is important to them and what works in selling to them matters.

I think the only group that thinks 'white males can do it all, no one else is needed' is white males. Sorry but alone as a group you are not better selling to women's interests and POC interests.

But beyond that, fine if you want to believe that, but companies, nor governments have to believe they are not stronger and better served by having diversity to address the issues of a diverse clientele or diverse society.
 
ptif219 said:
Since when is race and gender qualifications to be a Senator?
Click to expand...

If you consider 'serving the needs of a diverse society' part of the qualifications to be a Senator, then race and gender must be considered.

For instance look at the massive discrepancy in Republican state house voting on ALL women's health issues including abortion where almost 100% white men vote for the harshest and most restrictive measures put on the table, while the Republican women increasingly break away and vote in favour of women's health care rights, even when the woman is anti abortion.

That is because white men are not considering and do not care or understand how many OTHER women's health care issues are being impacted by these overly repressive measures. Men have never cared much or wanted to even know what is going on with women's health care issues.

That is why it is ENORMOURSLY important to have gender considered, when more than 50% of the populace will be impacted by another gender who will not 2 seconds to consider the downstream impacts of what they do.
 
Does the law matter, is it ENORMOUSLY important?

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, and religion;
 
ptif219 said:
It is segragationist Democrats that hated him. The Democrats were and still are the racist party
Click to expand...

Ohhhhh we have a student of Ron DiSantis school system who only gets Chapter one of each history book.

Yes pre the Civil war and Civll and Womens rights movements, most Southern Dems (DixieCrats) were the racist in the US. IN Chapter 2 (that part DeSantis bans you from reading) you learn they all moved to the Republican party and that is why the GOP is now the party of racists.
How the ‘Party of Lincoln’ Won Over the Once Democratic South
Democratic defectors, known as the “Dixiecrats,” started a switch to the Republican party in a movement that was later fueled by a so-called "Southern strategy."
Click to expand...

Sadly for you DeSantis has not been able to ban FULL history outside Florida.

\
 
DiSantis has banned no books.

This is the lie that the far left Democratic Socialist loons ignore.

DeSantis removed non-age appropriate material from school libraries where young children are present.

These books are still available in book stores and public libraries.
 
Lionfish said:
Next time you enter a surgical suite make sure you are content with the fact your doctor was hired for his/her/it's skin color and chosen gender, as opposed to skill at replacing your brain during the transplant.

I think otherwise and this is a perfect example of the idiotic "wokeness" running through our society. Take your ESG and equity and inclusion scores and shove them where the sun don't shine.

https://www.westernjournal.com/airl...ze-racial-quotas-qualifications-pilot-hiring/
Click to expand...

Why when what you are saying is a lie?

Again there is not one single person in the country qualified to get any of these jobs. That is not how things work.

That is the constant lie the right spins. There are always NUMEROUS people qualified to do the job graduating schools and not a clear singular best for any of these jobs.


So what ALWAYS happens is that NUMEROUS other factors then get factored in to the hiring decisions.

I get that you Trumpderps have never held a job above counter help level but i can tell you whether it is for top corporate or top government positions, there ALWAYS ends up being a list of applicants qualified for the job. A list that often requires them bring in consultants and hiring specialists to help them choose the best applicant across multiple considerations areas since they ALL meet the top base requirements of the job.


So this lie that republiclowns spin, that the persons are not qualified, is just that, a lie. FOr instance Republiclowns touted it as positive when Trump said he would appoint a 'women' and then did so with ACB to the Supreme Court. The same republiclowns cried foul when Biden said he would appoint a black women and did so with Justice Jackson, who in every way measurable had more experience and was more qualified than ACB.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top