Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
Went with the PMS smack eh? That's weak but, it's all you had.
You can't get around the fact that science doesn't work on consensus.
New study in Nature shows pause is real
- Thread starter cancel2 2022
- Start date
Went with the PMS smack eh? That's weak but, it's all you had.
You can't get around the fact that science doesn't work on consensus.
Bump!
Here's a little ditty by Mr. Missing Heat himself, Kevin Trenberth, that acknowledges our hiatus is in fact something climate scientists believe.
https://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v4/n10/full/nclimate2341.html
Seasonal aspects of the recent pause in surface warming
Kevin E. Trenberth, John T. Fasullo, Grant Branstator & Adam S. Phillips
Affiliations
Contributions
Corresponding author
Nature Climate Change
4,
911–916
(2014)
doi:10.1038/nclimate2341
Are you warmers science deniers, or is Kevin Trenberth a denier of science?
Here's a little ditty by Mr. Missing Heat himself, Kevin Trenberth, that acknowledges our hiatus is in fact something climate scientists believe.
https://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v4/n10/full/nclimate2341.html
Seasonal aspects of the recent pause in surface warming
Kevin E. Trenberth, John T. Fasullo, Grant Branstator & Adam S. Phillips
Affiliations
Contributions
Corresponding author
Nature Climate Change
4,
911–916
(2014)
doi:10.1038/nclimate2341
Are you warmers science deniers, or is Kevin Trenberth a denier of science?
Of course it does. What do you think would have happened to special relativity if every scientist other than Einstein were aligned against it?
Stupid.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
McAwful says he won't believe anything unless it's in Nature, so here it is but he's suddenly gone to ground. It is impossible trying to reason with these people they just don't have the background or knowledge to argue intelligently. I can't imagine for one moment that they even know who Keith Trenberth is, or indeed the raging debate over the "missing heat".
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Last edited:
It appears you wish to compete with that shitweasel Truth Detector with your spate of groans. Just having a bad day, bitch, or did your sanitary napkin spring a leak?
evince
Truthmatters
oil company cock suckers
cancel2 2022
Canceled
I don't agree with Grind about much, but he is right to say that you have genuine mental problems.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
cancel2 2022
Canceled
So then show me a link between the GWPF, whom I'm sure you've never heard of before, and Big Oil. After all you always demanding evidence from others so you should be able to do the same without equivocation. Please avoid references to weasel's anatomy if at all possible.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Last edited:
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Here are just ten examples where the scientific consensus was totally wrong.
https://ipccreport.wordpress.com/2014/08/19/the-consensus-was-wrong/
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
evince
Truthmatters
and the evidence was such that the consensus changed
that is not where we are at with GW asshole
cancel2 2022
Canceled
So I asked you for evidence to substantiate your claim that the GWPF is in the pocket of Big Oil and unsurprisingly you offer none, only to then invite me to join you in your love of ordure eating. You haven't a clue how the scientific method works, as it most certainly doesn't respect politicians, political correctness, popularity contests or lunatics on forums advocating coprophilia.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Have I ever denied that there is an anthropogenic signal in the purported warming?
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Consensus controls everything. It is a meta reality. Science is no exception. The scientific method is exactly what? A law of nature? No, it is the consensus of the mode of empiricism.
Even a damn dictator is subject to consensus. So long as at least three humans exist, there will be consensus.
Even a damn dictator is subject to consensus. So long as at least three humans exist, there will be consensus.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Ah yes, argumentum ad populum I believe.
https://thelogicofscience.com/2015/...pealing-to-authority-vs-deferring-to-experts/
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
It is a matter of emphasis. Instead of evenhandedness, in every instance you seek as an advocate to diminish that "signal"
Your "signal" is all denial, even if on occasion you mouth "agw" exists.
Answer me this: do you believe the anthropogenic climate change portion matters? Or is it deminimus and immaterial.
For if your answer is "yes" then the difference between you and a denier is immaterial from a policy perspective.
Now people, watch him squirm out of answering.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
As predicted McAwful has totally ignored this Trenberth paper in Nature!
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Fuck you, why have you ignored the Kevin Trenberth paper published in NATURE about the Pause and the Missing Heat? I am not a denier, which is a disgusting word anyway, as it is used deliberately to associate sceptics with Holocaust deniers. Every true scientist should be sceptical ffs, that is the scientific method in practice.
Last edited:
Oh I admit that wholly. I don't live and breathe this as you seemingly do. Pun not intended. I don't know what it's about and probably won't read the abstract. I am pretty adept at perceiving obvious biases. You are a climate denial hack who has simply been forced to retreat to what you perceive as the new front in your unholy war. And you wage it on the internet along with a bunch of others like me who don't matter.
Notice fans, he refused to answer whether his core belief is as a practical matter distinguishable at all from a flat earth type denier.
And I'm sorry, there is no holocaust connection. That atrocity does not OWN the word "deny" such that it cannot be used, just as you don't own the word "pissbucket" despite the obvious similarity.