New Site Just Launched

Status
Not open for further replies.
First of all, thank you for taking the time for reading this. I recently launched a site called Explain Conservatism. The goal is to cover as many policy topics as possible as well providing resources for people who are interested in politics. It is a YouTube Channel and a Website. The first several posts and videos will cover specific policies and eventually will start covering current events. In the coming weeks we are going to start rolling out series such as "Cause and Effect" which will examine different policies and how they work.

www.explainconservatism.w
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCj8YOGg1EOn4UdKHr9dyEGQ
Twitter : @ExplainConserva

Please take a look,

Thanks
 
There has been plenty of results. When has raising taxes worked? It seems that many other factors are in play, hard to point to a specific policy. Imagine if there was an obama after carter. The US wouldn't exist anymore.
 
Not sure what exactly I'm supposed to cite? Just look at the economies of every republican run state and compare it to democrat run states. Not to mention the 40 years of liberal policy that has destroyed metropolitan areas.
 
Not sure what exactly I'm supposed to cite? Just look at the economies of every republican run state and compare it to democrat run states. Not to mention the 40 years of liberal policy that has destroyed metropolitan areas.

You said there were "plenty of results" due to tax cuts and said that trickle down worked "great".

Do you have any evidence, or not?
 
How's that "trickle down" thing working for you?

Trickle down worked exactly as planned. The very rich were given tax cuts and they generated jobs for the very poor. Take a look at global incomes. The very rich and very poor increased massively while everyone in the middle stayed the same or stagnated as their jobs were given to the very poor.

It just so happened that the very poor were not located in America. They were in India China and other countries. The economists just didnt tell you that part.
 
Trickle down worked exactly as planned. The very rich were given tax cuts and they generated jobs for the very poor. Take a look at global incomes. The very rich and very poor increased massively while everyone in the middle stayed the same or stagnated as their jobs were given to the very poor.

It just so happened that the very poor were not located in America. They were in India China and other countries. The economists just didnt tell you that part.

A small detail, but an important one..
 
Not sure what exactly I'm supposed to cite? Just look at the economies of every republican run state and compare it to democrat run states. Not to mention the 40 years of liberal policy that has destroyed metropolitan areas.

Like Kansas?

New data from Sam Brownback’s Kansas destroys the GOP myth that tax cuts create jobs

e state of Kansas, where Gov. Sam Brownback’s right-wing economic program and handling of the state finances have reached comedic levels of absurdity, is now also failing at a key economic test: Keeping up with the neighboring state.

In his latest column, Kansas City Star opinion writer Yael Abouhalkah, a strong critic of Brownback’s who has made a regular beat of busting the governor and his advocates, highlights the newest data from the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics, which show the disparity in job numbers between the Kansas and Missouri sides of the Kansas City metro area.

“The data, in fact, are extremely discouraging for Brownback and the few remaining people who thought his tax cuts would act like a jobs magnet for the Sunflower State,” writes Abouhalkah. “The bottom line: Missouri gained employment almost five times faster than Kansas in the metro region over the full year from February 2015 to February 2016.”

The Missouri side of the state line added 13,900 total jobs from February 2015 to February 2016, a local rate of 2.4 percent. By contrast, the Kansas side added just 2,200 jobs, a rate of just 0.5 percent. (The Missouri side of metro area is slightly larger than the Kansas side to begin with.)

Earlier this year, Brownback was still boasting of his goal of cutting taxes in order to bring jobs into the Kansas side of the metro area, by cutting taxes and containing public spending: “This is the basic philosophy of what we’re trying to get done in Kansas.”
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/04/new-data-from-sam-brownbacks-kansas-destroys-the-gop-myth-that-tax-cuts-create-jobs/
 
A couple of billion people have been left poverty because of capitalism. Is that a bad thing because it's not "America first"?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top