New National ID System

Even I'm bored with you now, wanker . Don't let me stop you from further diminishing yourself though.
 
Frank Apisa said:
I consider Libertarianism (and libertarianism)...to be unworthy political philosophies...although I listened respectfully when the head of the (rather small) Libertarian Party in my hometown attempted to induce me to change my run for township council from Independent candidate to Libertarian candidate. To make that more emphatic: I personally hold libertarian political philosophy to be more devoid of reason and logic than conservative political philosophy...and I have often described American conservative political philosophy to be a cancer growing on the American body politic.

That said...in order for civilization to survive...in order for humans to live together in relative peace and harmony...governments have to restrict personal freedom to some degree or we'd have nothing but chaos and anarchy.

For the most part, even libertarians recognize the need for this...and are arguing mostly about where to draw the line.

If you expect total personal freedom...okay. Go for it.
Click to expand...

so you do hate freedom. I know, you said you don't, but you really do. you like YOUR brand of what YOU consider freedom, but that's not real freedom.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
so you do hate freedom. I know, you said you don't, but you really do. you like YOUR brand of what YOU consider freedom, but that's not real freedom.
Click to expand...

I do not hate freedom...in fact, as I said, I treasure it.

I treasure that I have it...and that you have it.

But for people like you, unless I say, "Oh, you are correct, you are correct"...you are going to suppose it makes sense to claim that I hate freedom.

Hey, no problem. Even people like you are allowed to post on the Internet. There is no "reasonable" requirement.
 
CFM said:
He also said that he believed it was OK for someone to drive drunk and that checkpoints designed to prevent innocent people from being killed were wrong. In fact, me mentioned that a family member had been killed by a drunk driver yet that it was still wrong to try and prevent one from killing more. If he doesn't care enough for his own family, imagine how little he cares about other innocent people.
Click to expand...

well we all know that you'd burn the constitution and negate everyones rights (except your own, of course) in the hopes that your police state government would make you feel safer, so your statist opinion is about as shitty as your underwear.
 
Frank Apisa said:
I do not hate freedom...in fact, as I said, I treasure it.

I treasure that I have it...and that you have it.

But for people like you, unless I say, "Oh, you are correct, you are correct"...you are going to suppose it makes sense to claim that I hate freedom.

Hey, no problem. Even people like you are allowed to post on the Internet. There is no "reasonable" requirement.
Click to expand...

you can't possibly 'treasure' your freedom if you don't care about your privacy. it's completely impossible
 
SmarterthanYou said:
well we all know that you'd burn the constitution and negate everyones rights (except your own, of course) in the hopes that your police state government would make you feel safer, so your statist opinion is about as shitty as your underwear.
Click to expand...

We all know you'd prefer drunk drivers be allowed to drive drunk instead of trying to prevent them from harming INNOCENT people.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
you can't possibly 'treasure' your freedom if you don't care about your privacy. it's completely impossible
Click to expand...

It may seem impossible to you...but I suggest as respectfully as possible...that has less to do with what is possible/impossible...than with your unwillingness to examine your prejudices.

I MOST ASSUREDLY TREASURE MY FREEDOM...AND YOURS FOR YOU.

I do not think the idea of a national ID system is so intrusive as to make that unusual...let alone impossible.

And, the pragmatism in me tells me that your idea of privacy is like the idea of having a pet dinosaur.
 
CFM said:
We all know you'd prefer drunk drivers be allowed to drive drunk instead of trying to prevent them from harming INNOCENT people.
Click to expand...

we all know you're a fucking idiot because you continue to assume shit I didn't say or take it out of context. but by all means, keep trashing the constitutional rights of others so you and yours feel safe, liberal.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
so you have no answer, you just want to chum up to CFM and be a moron also. got it.
Click to expand...

Your mindset came to the forefront last night, as I watched a show; because something they said was an exact regurgitation of what you've spewed, in the past.

Now I have more reason to just point and laugh at your comments. :D
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Your mindset came to the forefront last night, as I watched a show; because something they said was an exact regurgitation of what you've spewed, in the past.

Now I have more reason to just point and laugh at your comments. :D
Click to expand...

i have a feeling i know what show you're talking about, which does you a major disservice or shows us that you're just as incapable of rational thought as most other liberals. so sad for you.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
we all know you're a fucking idiot because you continue to assume shit I didn't say or take it out of context. but by all means, keep trashing the constitutional rights of others so you and yours feel safe, liberal.
Click to expand...

You oppose things that protect the innocent drivers while allowing the drunk ones to continue to drive the roads.

Maybe your wife will be the next one killed by a drunk driver. The difference is if she thinks like you, she isn't innocent.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
i have a feeling i know what show you're talking about, which does you a major disservice or shows us that you're just as incapable of rational thought as most other liberals. so sad for you.
Click to expand...

OH, that show wasn't the only one that has allowed the "travelers" to show themselves in a bad light; it just prompted me to remember the entire collection and then, that brought to mind all the comments you've made.

You're a joke.
 
CFM said:
You oppose things that protect the innocent drivers while allowing the drunk ones to continue to drive the roads.
Click to expand...
I oppose things that tread on the constitutional rights of we the people. why do you hate constitutional rights?

CFM said:
Maybe your wife will be the next one killed by a drunk driver. The difference is if she thinks like you, she isn't innocent.
Click to expand...

since my wife is medically disabled, she can't drive, but I appreciate your heartfelt concern over her health. thank you.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
OH, that show wasn't the only one that has allowed the "travelers" to show themselves in a bad light; it just prompted me to remember the entire collection and then, that brought to mind all the comments you've made.

You're a joke.
Click to expand...

and you're obviously someone who hates constitutional rights as well as the letter of the law. it's all about the 'feels' with you liberals, isn't it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top