New hero for Zimmerman supporters?

[USFREEDOM911]

Is that right? According to you, a person can claim to have been "severely" injured without obtaining medical treatment?

Since you left off the rest of my explanation, I believe I've answered that.

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

Since you left off the rest of my explanation, I believe I've answered that.

Since the rest of your "explanation" was anecdotal, are you saying that Trayvon Martin deserved to die because George Zimmerman said he was attacked and injured, despite the fact that Zimmerman did not require hospitalization for said injuries?

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

"Might have"?

So you're saying it's OK to kill someone if they "might have" done something, and Trayvon Martin is a "criminal" because George Zimmerman says so?

if that something is possible death or great bodily harm, yes. The question of self defense is always going to involve the question of "might have" because if self defense is done correctly, you are stopping future action. (duh)

It's not debatable that trayvon physically assaulted zimmerman. There is no evidence that zimmerman broke any law before this criminal assault. Trayvon was the true criminal in this ordeal.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Since the rest of your "explanation" was anecdotal, are you saying that Trayvon Martin deserved to die because George Zimmerman said he was attacked and injured, despite the fact that Zimmerman did not require hospitalization for said injuries?

Is that what I said?

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

if that something is possible death or great bodily harm, yes. The question of self defense is always going to involve the question of "might have" because if self defense is done correctly, you are stopping future action. (duh) It's not debatable that trayvon physically assaulted zimmerman. There is no evidence that zimmerman broke any law before this criminal assault. Trayvon was the true criminal in this ordeal.

So you think it's OK to pre-emptively kill someone because they "might" beat your ass?

And where's the evidence that Martin assaulted Zimmerman? How do you know Zimmerman didn't attack Martin?

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

Is that what I said?

Here's what you said:

I went down with my bike, in January of 2011. Landed really hard on my right shoulder. I didn't go to any hospital, even though I probably should have; because here it is May of 2012 and it still gives me problems. Going or not going is no proof or evidence of how severe an injury MAY be.

Now, explain what you meant.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Here's what you said:



Now, explain what you meant.

It meant:
"Going or not going is no proof or evidence of how severe an injury MAY be."

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

It meant: "Going or not going is no proof or evidence of how severe an injury MAY be."

So you agree that Zimmerman's injuries may not have been "severe"?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

So you agree that Zimmerman's injuries may not have been "severe"?

Is that what I said?

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

Is that what I said?

Here's what you said:

"Going or not going is no proof or evidence of how severe an injury MAY be."

So the severity of Zimmerman's injuries cannot be determined because he didn't go to a hospital, right?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Here's what you said:



So the severity of Zimmerman's injuries cannot be determined because he didn't go to a hospital, right?

Is that what it meant?

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

The severity of injuries can't be determined on the basis of not going to a hospital?

Isn't that what you said?

It meant: "Going or not going is no proof or evidence of how severe an injury MAY be."

 

[USFREEDOM911]

The severity of injuries can't be determined on the basis of not going to a hospital?

Isn't that what you said?

Is it?