NC any GA gay pride!

Mind your own business, I will too, and the world will be a better place.

Walking down a public street naked is not ....minding your own business
2015-07-02-niles-i.jpg


Acting out a bondage sex act half naked in back of a PU truck on a public street is not ....minding your own business


Acting out a bondage sex act half naked in your private home...is minding your own business
 
Last edited:
If they didn't have Pride parades they would be more respected!


Most sane people dont want to see them prance around half naked




Straights don't have a Pride Month.????


Im not proud the be straight!! Its normal and nothing to be proud of....do we have Left Handed Pride Month?

You do not have to see them "prancing ' around. You obviously go out of your way to see them. Most Americans really do not know what you are talking about.
Straights have 12 months.
 
You do not have to see them "prancing ' around. You obviously go out of your way to see them. Most Americans really do not know what you are talking about.
Straights have 12 months.

No one has to see a Gen Lee statue ....so people should STFU about it...right
 
Walking down a public street naked is not ....minding your own business
View attachment 25276


Acting out a bondage sex act half naked in back of a PU truck on a public street is not ....minding your own business


Acting out a bondage sex act half naked in your private home...is minding your own business

Bet you found the original pic w/o the modesty blurs, printed it out, and taped it to your bedroom ceiling, didn't you? :laugh:
 
You know so little about current events. The web designer is a female. She wants to design "wedding websites" (whateverthef that is), but not for SSM couples. What do you suppose will happen when the next bigot refuses to design for an interracial couple, like you claim to be part of? Or for an older newlywed couple, past the age of child-bearing, because their god said to "be fruitful and multiply"?

You homophobes and racists never think things through. You believe that you won something because of this case. You didn't. Let's check back in a year and see how well Ms. Smith's new business is doing, shall we?
It was all made up, that’s what’s truly disgusting.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/06/30/politics/colorado-web-designer-court-filings/index.html
 
The decision should be vacated, in this case, and Ms. Smith needs to be charged with perjury. So does her attorney.

Had a feeling it was just made-up bullshit, but never suspected that the alleged gay couple didn't even exist.



She received a request to do a gay wedding website! FACT undisputed
 
The decision should be vacated, in this case, and Ms. Smith needs to be charged with perjury. So does her attorney.

Had a feeling it was just made-up bullshit, but never suspected that the alleged gay couple didn't even exist.


This case obviously did not start at the Supreme Court level.

This is a bogus attempt to discredit the findings.

Was the Colorado law declared unconstitutional based originally on a fraudulent case filing?

If so the state might want to try to vacate the ruling that invalidated its precious law.
 
The decision should be vacated, in this case, and Ms. Smith needs to be charged with perjury. So does her attorney.

Had a feeling it was just made-up bullshit, but never suspected that the alleged gay couple didn't even exist.


And Jane Roe was impregnated by a white man through consensual sex, not raped by black men as she claimed so she could get an abortion! So that case started out as MADE UP!!!!!!!
 
She received a request to do a gay wedding website! FACT undisputed

She claims that she did, but the person who's named in the official court filings as the person who requested the SSM website says that it was not him.

1) He is already married and has been for 15 years, to a woman.

2) He is a web designer himself, and stated that he would have no reason to hire someone else.

3) He had no contact with the plaintiff.

Try reading before spouting off your bullshit. Thanks.
 
This case obviously did not start at the Supreme Court level.

This is a bogus attempt to discredit the findings.

Was the Colorado law declared unconstitutional based originally on a fraudulent case filing?

If so the state might want to try to vacate the ruling that invalidated its precious law.

You are wrong, as always. She went straight to the federal level with a "preemptive" lawsuit. Her court filings did not, at first, mention the alleged gay person's name. She added that later, along with his address and phone number, when attorneys told her that she didn't have standing because there was no request for a website from an alleged gay person.

The man named in the Supreme Court’s gay rights ruling says he didn’t request a wedding website

DENVER (AP) — A Colorado web designer who the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Friday could refuse to make wedding websites for gay couples cited a request from a man who says he never asked to work with her.

The request in dispute, from a person identified as “Stewart,” wasn’t the basis for the federal lawsuit filed preemptively seven years ago by web designer Lorie Smith, before she started making wedding websites. But as the case advanced, it was referenced by her attorneys when lawyers for the state of Colorado pressed Smith on whether she had sufficient grounds to sue.

The revelation distracts from Smith’s victory at a time when she might have been basking in her win, which is widely considered a setback for gay rights.

Smith named Stewart — and included a website service request from him, listing his phone number and email address in 2017 court documents. But Stewart told The Associated Press he never submitted the request and didn’t know his name was invoked in the lawsuit until he was contacted this week by a reporter from The New Republic, which first reported his denial.

“I was incredibly surprised given the fact that I’ve been happily married to a woman for the last 15 years,” said Stewart
, who declined to give his last name for fear of harassment and threats. His contact information, but not his last name, were listed in court documents.

He added that he was a designer and “could design my own website if I need to” — and was concerned no one had checked into the validity of the request cited by Smith until recently.
 
Back
Top