NATO's proxy war in the news

Legion

Oderint dum metuant
275569535_2010813122430481_3399899958167048090_n.jpg



Putin is, obviously, a thug.

He rose through the ranks of the old KGB during the Cold War, and he has repeatedly described the fall of Communism and the dissolution of the Soviet Union as one of the greatest tragedies in modern political history.

One can acknowledge all of that while simultaneously recognizing that modern post-Soviet Ukraine is not, and never has been, anything like the U.S./U.K.-style bastion of “liberal democracy” that mid-wit cable news talking heads — to say nothing of the propagandist @Ukraine Twitter account — depict it as.

Ukraine is just as corrupt and just as oligarchic as Russia, if not more so.

At the time of Ukraine’s 2014 color revolution (itself clandestinely abetted by liberal NGO types), which deposed the pro-Russian president, Viktor Yanukovych, the nation ranked as one of the absolute most corrupt nations in the world.

There are neo-Nazi paramilitary units, such as the Azov Battalion, active in Ukraine.

Ukraine, lest amnesic Westerners forget, is also the country of Hunter Biden and Burisma.

Ukrainian oligarch Victor Pinchuk was, for years, a massive donor to the Clinton Foundation.

And Zelenskyy himself, of course, was at the center of President Donald Trump’s first (entirely bogus!) impeachment.

It seems there is something fundamentally rotten about modern Ukraine that no enterprising investigative journalist has yet uncovered.


https://spectator.org/clarity-on-russia-ukraine-and-the-american-national-interest/




Discuss, if you have the wit.
 
Pope Francis decries “barbarianism” at the killing of children, defenseless civilians in Ukraine
VATICAN CITY — Pope Francis has decried the “barbarianism” of the killing of children and other defenseless civilians in Ukraine and pleaded for a stop to the attacks “before cities are reduced to cemeteries.” In some of his strongest denunciations yet of the war in Ukraine, and in apparent reference to Russia, which invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24, the pontiff said that “there are no strategic reasons that hold up” in the face of such armed aggression

iu
 
Putin attacked Ukraine, which had been refused NATO membership, because of NATO. Do reds even care about making sense?
 
skynews-evgeny-lebedev-boris-johnson_5704838.jpg


Evgeny Lebedev and Boris Johnson in 2009



Michael Gove defends Boris Johnson meeting oligarch Evgeny Lebedev who MI6 had concerns about

The oligarch's father was a KGB agent in London and there were concerns Lord Lebedev was also a security risk to the UK, which the prime minister was allegedly warned of nearly a decade ago.


https://news.sky.com/story/michael-gove-defends-boris-johnson-meeting-oligarch-evgeny-lebedev-who-mi6-had-concerns-about-12565036

Bozo Johnson's party took millions of dollars from Russian oligarch donors - and refuses to give it back. They're good at impounding anything else Russian though.
 
Bozo Johnson's party took millions of dollars from Russian oligarch donors - and refuses to give it back. They're good at impounding anything else Russian though.

Indeed.

THE WAR IN UKRAINE: THE QUESTION EVERYONE IS AFRAID TO ASK (OR MAYBE THEY ARE ASHAMED TO)

Before we posit the soul-shivering question promised in the headline above it is necessary to set the stage for what is undeniably a prickly discourse. A review of the fraught but relevant events of the last fourteen months leading up to the Russian invasion of Ukraine is as follows.

In January of 2021 shortly after taking office, President Biden canceled the Keystone Pipeline. He also announced that the U.S. would not be issuing any more drilling permits for oil production on federal lands. New permits for offshore drilling would be restricted as well. This resulted in a major reduction in energy output in the United States. It also resulted in the loss of thousands of high-paying jobs for American workers.

Biden then asked the Saudis to increase their oil production to offset what was being lost in U.S. output. But the Saudis declined. It was then necessary for the United States to begin buying oil from Russia to make up the difference. Under the Trump administration the U.S. had been energy independent, but no more.

The price of oil has skyrocketed as a result of these shortages. This created a major windfall for Vladimir Putin and his geopolitical ambitions.

The purpose of reducing U.S. oil and gas output was to protect the environment. However, it is difficult to see how the same amount of oil being pumped in Russia or Saudi Arabia reduces overall emissions for the protection of the planet.

On May 19, 2021, Biden also removed sanctions of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline. The new pipeline, now complete, has allowed the shipping of natural gas more directly from Russia to Western Europe. Before the completion of Nord Stream 2, the main pipeline for shipping natural gas to Western Europe was through Ukraine. That would have made an invasion of Ukraine problematic.

Critics claimed the approval of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline facilitated the Russian invasion. A letter signed by sixty-eight Republican members of the House of Representatives asserted that the president was very unwise for waiving sanctions against the pipeline. The letter said:

“The completion of Nord Stream 2, which was slowed during the Trump Administration, will be a gift to Putin and his efforts to increase geopolitical influence in Europe.

“Waving sanctions for Nord Stream 2 … is the wrong message to our allies and partners and undermines our credibility and global leadership.” The letter also pointed out that Russia being able to pump more natural gas to the rest of Europe will cost American jobs and reduce ”America’s geopolitical influence.”

It is also important to keep in mind that the United States has more total energy resources than any other nation in the world, more than even Russia or Saudi Arabia.

The Biden Family has received tens of millions of dollars from both the Chinese and the Russian governments. The New York Post quoted a purported email from Hunter Biden in August of 2017 in which he said that he was receiving $10,000,000 a year payment for “introductions alone.” The payments were coming from a Chinese billionaire. It was not clear exactly who was involved in the introductions. However, at $10,000,000 a year, they would seem to be people of serious importance.

In still another email which Fox News said that it has confirmed, Hunter Biden allegedly refers to a deal with China’s largest private energy company in which he states that “10 held by H for the Big Guy.” In the presidential debates Donald Trump asked Joe Biden if he was the “Big Guy?”

Biden offered no answer.

Hunter Biden also received $3,500,000 from the wife of the mayor of Moscow. In exchange for what has never been explained. Again this is very serious money.

It might be fair to assume that only a limited amount of these cash transfers have ever become public. The vast majority of the transfers could be presumed to be sub rosa. Only by accident have some of the transactions spilled over into public knowledge. (The recovery of Hunter Biden’s forgotten laptop being one source of the embarrassing information.)

It is fair to point out that no one, especially not President Xi or Vladimir Putin, pays out tens of millions of dollars and expects nothing in return. This of course then raises the question of what did they expect and what did they in fact receive in exchange for all of their emoluments?

And now we come to our stab-to-the-heart, key question: Did the Biden Family and perhaps Joe Biden himself, “the big guy,” receive payments and compensation from the Chinese and/or Russian governments in exchange for favorable rulings or actions on the part of the White House?

There is a second prong to this edgy question. If Biden did take money under compromising circumstances could he be blackmailed for doing so? In other words, do the Chinese and/or the Russians have something on him?

To be fair it should be said that there is serious evidence that the Bidens took money under very suspicious circumstances. However, so far there is no direct evidence that connects the money to any treasonous behavior. That is only speculation. But inquiring minds the world over want to know.


https://humanevents.com/2022/03/11/the-war-in-ukraine-the-question-everyone-is-afraid-to-ask-or-maybe-they-are-ashamed-to/
 
Pope Francis decries “barbarianism” at the killing of children, defenseless civilians in Ukraine

VATICAN CITY — Pope Francis has decried the “barbarianism” of the killing of children and other defenseless civilians in Ukraine and pleaded for a stop to the attacks “before cities are reduced to cemeteries.” In some of his strongest denunciations yet of the war in Ukraine, and in apparent reference to Russia, which invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24, the pontiff said that “there are no strategic reasons that hold up” in the face of such armed aggression.


NzYzMjEuanBn
 
Putin attacked Ukraine, which had been refused NATO membership, because of NATO. Do reds even care about making sense?

Maybe you didn't notice that the Russians just destroyed a major 'NATO' training camp/arms dump just inside the Ukrainian border with Poland. Perhaps you think that it was built within the past three weeks.

NATO is the aggressor.
 
Russia sends message to foreign mercenaries in Ukraine
The military says it knows the location of all foreign fighters in Ukraine and vows to continue targeting them


“All locations of foreign mercenaries in Ukraine are known to us,” Russian military spokesman Major-General Igor Konashenkov said in a statement on Monday. “I want to warn you again – there will be no mercy for the mercenaries, no matter where they are on the territory of Ukraine.”

https://www.rt.com/russia/551910-mercy-mercenaries-ukraine-konashenkov/
 
maggot told Ivan where they were.

More likely the virtue signalers were tweeting and posting selfies so their chicken-hawk cheerleaders back home could admire them.


Haw, haw..................................haw.
 
Back
Top