NATO reveals scale of its involvement in training Ukrainian troops

Matt Dillon said:
Russia has since bombed ( actually missled) that training center into a pile of rubble.

Which seems to be their general plan for all of Ukraine.

42+ million people ain't gonna like that.
Click to expand...

Ukraine is making a fool out of Putin and his tin soldiers. More for you to be proud of my dear.
 
floridafan said:
Thanks for being unable to answer! Had Russia not illegally and immorally invaded Crimea, NATO would never have come to their aid.
Click to expand...
"immorally" - like Uk cutting off the Dnieper river to Crimea? depriving it of fresh water.
put on your dunce cap and STFU

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Crimean_Canal
After the Russian annexation of Crimea, Ukrainian authorities greatly cut the volume of water flowing into Crimea via the canal, citing a huge outstanding debt on water supplies owed by the peninsula.
On 26 February 2022, Russian forces destroyed the concrete dam by an explosion and the water supply was resumed.[18]
 
anatta said:
"immorally" - like Uk cutting off the Dnieper river to Crimea? depriving it of fresh water.
put on your dunce cap and STFU

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Crimean_Canal
After the Russian annexation of Crimea, Ukrainian authorities greatly cut the volume of water flowing into Crimea via the canal, citing a huge outstanding debt on water supplies owed by the peninsula.
Click to expand...

Keep licking Putin's balls, its very becoming of you
 
floridafan said:
Here is the side of the story you choose to ignore:

Since Russia's illegal and illegitimate annexation of Crimea in 2014, NATO has helped to train, fund and reform Ukraine's armed forces and defence institutions
Click to expand...

Now we're into the realms of ' legality '. Almost the ENTIRE population of Crimea voted, by way of a referendum, to REJOIN Russia.
Crimea was always Russian. The British fought for it during the Crimean War.
Crimea was illegally ceded to Ukraine, without consultation, by a drunken Nikita Krushev, himself a Ukrainian, at a meeting of the Soviet Presidium which had no legal quorum

Now that the people of Crimea have got what they want - by returning to the motherland, what right have you got to say they acted ' illegally ' ?
 
ExpressLane said:
You dumbfuck Putin started the war and Ukraine is fighting a defensive war. Ukraine just had the foresight to prepare. Most of it started after Russia took Crimea.
Click to expand...

Micro-brain, it's Russia that is fighting a defensive war- a pre-emptive war, just like Israel's initiation of the Yom Kippur War of 1970. The US actually assisted in that one by way of intelligence briefings. Now the boot's on the other foot.
' Preventative wars ' are, of course, illegal- as are all wars- and so the Russians term this a ' limited military operation '. Go sue if you're unhappy with that.

Now clock this, drooler;
9. Overshadowing the arguments in Paragraph 8 above is the undeniable fact that the Kellogg-Briand Peace Pact of 1928, as definitively glossed by the International Tribunal at Nuremberg in 1948, has abolished forever the idea of acquisition of territory by military conquest. No matter who was the aggressor, international borders cannot change by the process of war. Resort to war is itself illegal, and while self-defense is of course legal, the self-defense cannot go so far as to constitute a new war of aggression all its own. And if it does, the land taken may at best be temporarily occupied, but cannot be annexed.

The Legal Boundaries of Israel in International Law
Anthony D'Amato
Leighton Professor of Law
Northwestern University School of Law
Click to expand...

The important points are that Russia will not annex Ukraine. It will withdraw. The regions that will adhere to Russia after this conflict will do so legally according to the law and will of their populations- not according to the NATO horseshit that you had for breakfast.
 
anatta said:
NATO is supposed to be a "defensive org" -how is training and providing weapons for Uk -a border state of Russia - "defensive"?
Click to expand...

is that a serious question?.......defensive forces need to train to be ready to defend......did you think only offensive forces train?......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
is that a serious question?.......defensive forces need to train to be ready to defend......did you think only offensive forces train?......
Click to expand...
NATO calls itself a "defensive org" not the training - but it's set up
NATO expansion is the aggression part in the guise of "defensive"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top