NASA admits that climate change occurs because of changes in Earth’s solar orbit, and

[Cypress]

[h=3]Description[/h]Natural News is a conspiracy theory and fake news website. The website sells various dietary supplements, promotes alternative medicine, tendentious nutrition and health claims, fake news, and espouses various conspiracy theories. Wikipedia

For the past two decades I have asked Climate Deniers why they are incapable of pointing to prestigious, internationally-recognized scientific organizations with expertise in climate science and a substantial body of peer reviewed scientific literature, to support their claims and assertions.

In two decades I have not received a credible answer to that question.

 

[Truth Detector]

For the past two decades I have asked Climate Deniers why they are incapable of pointing to prestigious, internationally-recognized scientific organization with expertise in climate science and a substantial body of peer reviewed scientific literature.

In two decades I have not received a credible answer to that question.

No one takes your bullshit seriously when you start every post with a lie, fabrication or strawman shit-for-brains.

 

[Centerleftfl]

Wikipedia? look we know it's true, the left saw a chance to grab more money from the American people and went headlong into it.
Now something I do know, you leftists continue to spew your hatred, and name call, I am done playing your game. If we met face to face I would shove those words down your throat, not because i am a violent person, but because what you and your socialist friends are trying to do is ruin this country for a Globalist Agenda. I doubt you understand that you are simply lemmings, and sheep, doing their bidding, but that is fact.

You gotta love it. Remember when being 'in the closet' for Republicans was about HOMOSEXUALITY? Now its because THEY KNOW there is climate change but 'can't come out'!

 

[Truth Detector]

You gotta love it. Remember when being 'in the closet' for Republicans was about HOMOSEXUALITY? Now its because THEY KNOW there is climate change but 'can't come out'!

What I love is watching shrill, dishonest lying leftists like you coming out every day and remove any doubt about it.

 

[Wolverine]

What I love is watching shrill, dishonest lying leftists like you coming out every day and remove any doubt about it.

It is enjoyable!

 

[moon]

^^Still stuck on moron.

I do enjoy watching you struggle for comment. Haw, haw.................................haw.

 

[Truth Detector]

I do enjoy watching you struggle for comment.

I wish I could say I enjoy watching your inane stupidity and pathological lying; but pathetic, redundant, petty and stupid are the only adjectives that come to mind.

You're a low IQ, terrorist loving buffoon who prefers echo chambers. Run along asshat.

 

[gfm7175]

For the past two decades

I don't believe you.

I have asked Climate Deniers why they are incapable of pointing to prestigious, internationally-recognized scientific organizations with expertise in climate science and a substantial body of peer reviewed scientific literature, to support their claims and assertions.

"prestigious, internationally-recognized scientific organizations with expertise in climate science and a substantial body of peer reviewed scientific literature" is NOT science. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. The relevant theories of science are the authoritative source with regard to this discussion.

In two decades I have not received a credible answer to that question.

Yes, you have. You have again just now.

I have pointed you to Logic, which tells us that words cannot be circularly defined, that definitions must make reference to something outside of themselves. Define "climate change". Describe precisely how a climate "changes"?

I have also pointed you to science, which tells us that the AGW model is not possible. See the Laws of Thermodynamics and the Stefan Boltzmann Law. You can't slow or trap heat, you can't increase entropy in an isolated system, you can't make heat flow backwards, you can't decrease radiance of Earth while increasing temperature of Earth.

I have also pointed you to mathematics, which tells us that we don't have the means to accurately measure the temperature of the Earth. Temperatures can easily vary by 20degF per mile, and since that variance is so high, we would need upwards of 200 million thermometers to even begin such an analysis of Earth's temperature. We don't have our thermometers uniformly spaced, we don't have the same observer simultaneously reading them all, and we don't even make use of RAW data, all of which are math errors.

"Climate Change" religious dogma is simply that... religious dogma. It rejects logic, it rejects science, it rejects mathematics...

 

[gfm7175]

You gotta love it. Remember when being 'in the closet' for Republicans was about HOMOSEXUALITY? Now its because THEY KNOW there is climate change but 'can't come out'!

Define "climate change".

Remember, circular definitions are meaningless...

 

[moon]

fgm7.15

Define "climate change".

 

[Guno צְבִי]

Wikipedia? look we know it's true, the left saw a chance to grab more money from the American people and went headlong into it.
Now something I do know, you leftists continue to spew your hatred, and name call, I am done playing your game. If we met face to face I would shove those words down your throat, not because i am a violent person, but because what you and your socialist friends are trying to do is ruin this country for a Globalist Agenda. I doubt you understand that you are simply lemmings, and sheep, doing their bidding, but that is fact.

poor christer kook

 

[Guno צְבִי]

Define "climate change".

Remember, circular definitions are meaningless...

 

[Truth Detector]

7.15

Typical response from low IQ, man caused climate conspiracy theorists.

 

[Truth Detector]

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--o4r2neey3A/U1nkQOFsswI/AAAAAAAABGk/ayFJJNk9CtI/s1600/bible+circular.jpg[/IMG]

^^Stuck on moron.

 

[Moosakofsky]

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-08...e-change-not-caused-by-suvs-fossil-fuels.html

How many fucking times do we have to POST THIS, asshole? We've responded numerous times when your ilk tries to PEDDLE your and it's bullshit. Especially from this site.

Natural News - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Natural_News


Natural News (formerly NewsTarget, which is now a separate sister site) is a conspiracy theory and fake news website. The website sells various dietary supplements, promotes alternative medicine, tendentious nutrition and health claims, fake news, and espouses various conspiracy theories.‎Founder · ‎Criticism and controversies · ‎Notable claims


​

All False statements involving NaturalNews.com | PolitiFact ...

https://www.politifact.com › naturalnewscom › statements › byruling › false



The measles vaccine has killed 108 people in the last decade, while no one has died of measles. — PolitiFact Georgia on Tuesday, March 3rd, 2015. Page 1 of ...


​

OK, Now show me an actual study that concludes the sun has nothing to do with GW and GW is completely attributed to SUV's and farting cows. Just one.

 

[Centerleftfl]

Define "climate change".

Remember, circular definitions are meaningless...

Notice how MOST REPUBLICANs use the term "Climate change". In science climate change and GLOBAL WARMING have scientific differences but are essentially the same (it's an 'over time' thing). They are both used by CLIMATE SCIENTISTS.

But a REPUBLICAN OPERATIVE decided several years back that REPUBLICANS should use CLIMATE CHANGE. 'It wasn't as SCARY and didn't evoke emotional reactions'. (If it doesn't 'sound scary' then you don't really have to hurry to do anything about it, right?) Apparently the REPS on this board got the memo!

If you don't know who FRANK LUNTZ is, find another board...

The second premise is also wrong, as demonstrated by perhaps the only individual to actually advocate changing the term from 'global warming' to 'climate change', Republican political strategist Frank Luntz in a controversial memo advising conservative politicians on communicating about the environment:

It’s time for us to start talking about “climate change” instead of global warming and “conservation” instead of preservation.“Climate change” is less frightening than “global warming”. As one focus group participant noted, climate change “sounds like you’re going from Pittsburgh to Fort Lauderdale.” While global warming has catastrophic connotations attached to it, climate change suggests a more controllable and less emotional challenge.​

 

[MAGA MAN]

Don't post trash sites. Like "Lifenews.com" and the other rabble rousing Russian owned garbage you guys like to throw around.

^ Attack the messenger; big surprise there.

 

[MAGA MAN]

It is always the same, Flat Earthers come up with some "study" from some recognized climate denier site and attempt to create a false paradigm, as if it immediately cancels out the preponderance of scientific evidence in the other direction

^ Attack the messenger; big surprise there.

"Flat Earth". You obvious didn't read anything of the article.

 

[gfm7175]

This is about circular definitions, not circular reasoning.

Definitions MUST make reference to something outside of themselves.

 

[gfm7175]

Notice how MOST REPUBLICANs use the term "Climate change".

There's no specific way that "republicans" use the term "climate change". The term is meaningless. It has not been defined outside of itself.

In science

Neither are science. They are religion.

climate change and GLOBAL WARMING

Undefined buzzwords. Define "climate change". Define "global warming".

have scientific differences

Undefined terms do not have "differences". They are simply undefined.

but are essentially the same (it's an 'over time' thing).

See above.

They are both used by CLIMATE SCIENTISTS.

Climate "scientists" are anything BUT... They reject science.

But a REPUBLICAN OPERATIVE decided several years back that REPUBLICANS should use CLIMATE CHANGE. 'It wasn't as SCARY and didn't evoke emotional reactions'. (If it doesn't 'sound scary' then you don't really have to hurry to do anything about it, right?) Apparently the REPS on this board got the memo!

It doesn't matter which term is used; they are both meaningless buzzwords.

If you don't know who FRANK LUNTZ is, find another board...

Don't know or care who he is.

The second premise is also wrong, as demonstrated by perhaps the only individual to actually advocate changing the term from 'global warming' to 'climate change'[/B], Republican political strategist Frank Luntz in a controversial memo advising conservative politicians on communicating about the environment:[/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE]

It’s time for us to start talking about “climate change” instead of global warming and “conservation” instead of preservation.“Climate change” is less frightening than “global warming”. As one focus group participant noted, climate change “sounds like you’re going from Pittsburgh to Fort Lauderdale.” While global warming has catastrophic connotations attached to it, climate change suggests a more controllable and less emotional challenge.​

I don't care what term is used... They are both meaningless buzzwords. Basing argumentation on them yields void arguments, a logical fallacy.