Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
The world is fundamentally composed of thermite. So, of course there was thermite at ground zero. It's part of the world isn't it? duh.
It's car parts .. and when car parts get hot they burn for weeks at a time.
I'm done here.
funny how you had time to reply to Asshats ignorance, but failed to have the time to address my question as to your claim on the FEMA report.
I wonder.... why might that be?
The world is fundamentally composed of thermite. So, of course there was thermite at ground zero. It's part of the world isn't it? duh.
Actually, much of the world (developed) is indeed composed of the COMPONENTS that can create a thermite burn. Anytime you have Iron and Aluminum in the same fire, they can leave traces that give the appearance of thermite.
That is just ONE of the combinations of metals that can do so.
funny how you had time to reply to Asshats ignorance, but failed to have the time to address my question as to your claim on the FEMA report.
I wonder.... why might that be?
Actually it's real simple.
I'm done talking to dumb people about this issue.
It's as simple as that.
You post to the fairy-tale believers and I'll talk to those who aren't.
I have NO DOUBT that the truth of this issue will be revealed even further.
Zogby Poll finds that 70 Million Voting Age Americans Support New 9/11 Investigation
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060522022041421
More than 50% of New Yorkers don't believe that bullshit.
The world has never believed it.
I'm cool with you believeing it.
It's not just a building fire, BAC. A tower collapsing and crushing 400 cars (what are car engines made out of - zinc - and frames? - aluminum) into powder and mixing it into a huge cloud of rusty metals makes traces of thermite. It's really that simple.
Answered again, and again, and again...
We don't post personal information without people's permission here. What would it matter anyway? The very reports cited by the theorists have, when shown in context, stated nothing about what they are used to promote by the theorists.not to the satisfaction of people other than simpletons and people who, like yourself, admittedly RELY on others to make your mind up.
Like you keep saying...without your egineering buddy...
is he some engineering god?
let's here his name? LOL
It's car parts .. and when car parts get hot they burn for weeks at a time.
I'm done here.
Actually you were done about 300 posts ago.... you were simply too ignorant to recognize that fact.
LMAO... so once again, I post facts, you try to spin off topic into a fucking poll? That is how desperate you are getting?
Your ignorance and blatant refusal to address even YOUR sources just shows how pathetic your argument is.
I notice once again.... YOU IGNORE THE FACTS... THIS TIME THE FACTS CAME FROM YOUR SOURCE. YET YOU STILL CLING TO YOUR FANTASY.
for you to proclaim that it is others that are fairy-tale believers is nothing short of the most ironic post ever.
We don't post personal information without people's permission here. What would it matter anyway? The very reports cited by the theorists have, when shown in context, stated nothing about what they are used to promote by the theorists.
If it isn't to your "satisfaction" it is because nothing would be. The idea that Thermite was used is ludicrous for the myriad reasons that have been reiterated throughout, with the only "answer" you guys give is pretending that the question hasn't been answered. Even the studies cited by the Jones crowd were used to show you that the reports didn't say what the Jones crowd said it did.
If something was used to take down the buildings other than just the attack, it wasn't thermite.
When the conspiracy theory is so nutty that even Coast to Coast won't carry it, you are loading some heavy theory into your wagon.
This is a logical fallacy. Nobody has said it was just fuel that brought down the buildings, that would indeed be ludicrous.jet fuel bringing down a sky scraper is ludicrous. I feel sorry that you haven't got the grasp of physics that I do. Too bad you think I 'm stupid. I know what my level of science understanding is, so I couldn't care less if a camera jockey and bunch of idiots who think the links in this thread suffice in any way in explaining the events and the evidence. You morons are the problem with a,erica. Too fucking lazy to do your homework so you're ignorant and you trust persons and institutions with records of fraud. What morons you are
This is a logical fallacy. Nobody has said it was just fuel that brought down the buildings, that would indeed be ludicrous.
And telling me that I am too "lazy to do my homework" fights with BAC's post as the most ironic on the thread.
Did you read the reports? Did you even bother to read the thread?
I've never suggested you are "stupid", so far the only people who have used that word on this thread are the people who pretend that their "questions haven't been answered."
I'll reiterate here, I sympathize with people who believe this kind of thing, I too distrust the government. I just don't allow that mistrust to blaze me into the illogical and unsupported.
This is a logical fallacy. Nobody has said it was just fuel that brought down the buildings, that would indeed be ludicrous.
And telling me that I am too "lazy to do my homework" fights with BAC's post as the most ironic on the thread.
Did you read the reports? Did you even bother to read the thread?
I've never suggested you are "stupid", so far the only people who have used that word on this thread are the people who pretend that their "questions haven't been answered."
I'll reiterate here, I sympathize with people who believe this kind of thing, I too distrust the government. I just don't allow that mistrust to blaze me into the illogical and unsupported.