Life is Golden
The Sage
She is a woman and a very unlikeable and non-charismatic one, at that. She is dumb and cannot answer regular questions.
The worst candidate the Dems have had ever.
The worst candidate the Dems have had ever.
And yet the Wall Street Mafia/CIA are installing her as President.She is a woman and a very unlikeable and non-charismatic one, at that. She is dumb and cannot answer regular questions.
The worst candidate the Dems have had ever.![]()
reputable sources have it at 70/30.The point here is there is nothing to backup your claims. Absolutely nothing but your feelings.
Nope, the riots and vandalism all began the night after Trump's election.I don't recall those, are you lumping in the Michael Brown protests or something? Are you saying the Women's March was responsible for this?
No need to be a bitch.
"Reputable sources"? You really believe that?reputable sources have it at 70/30.
do you deny it;s at 70/30?
What you are saying literally did not happen.The conversation was about the folks who in 2016, after the election of Trump, did the "mostly peaceful" protests where they burned cop cars, threw rocks, etc.
And there was violence at such protests?I think you are desperate to separate yourselves from them for some reason, however, the protests against Trump and things like trying to get electors to vote for Hillary regardless of who won the election in their state, etc. were not done by folks that were, as you put it, "not about a political candidate". You are simply "conveniently misremembering". As an act of political convenience it may even convince you, but not folks who pay attention to recent history.
Clinton conceded the election, and showed up to the inauguration to support the peaceful transfer of power to trump. She wrote an entire book about the experience, where she did not say any of the things you claim.you know, Hillary believed the election was stolen
Made up sources.reputable sources have it at 70/30.
do you deny it;s at 70/30?
I am trying to make sense of your insane claims.reputable sources have it at 70/30.
do you deny it;s at 70/30?
Yet she spent the next 8 years still saying it was stolen. I get when folks don't want to remember things, but the things still happened.Clinton conceded the election, and showed up to the inauguration to support the peaceful transfer of power to trump. She wrote an entire book about the experience, where she did not say any of the things you claim.
Quote anywhere that she said the election was stolen through election fraud.Yet she spent the next 8 years still saying it was stolen. I get when folks don't want to remember things, but the things still happened.
you're my hero all over again.Yet she spent the next 8 years still saying it was stolen. I get when folks don't want to remember things, but the things still happened.
The leaders of the Democrat party are devious. If Trump wins all hell will break loose.First I will say that I don't know who will win. I know I want to win. I know who I think should win. With that said.
If the polls are correct, Trump should win. If 2016 and 2020 are any clue the polls may be understating Trumps actual lead. Could the polls be wrong in favor of Trump? Of course, anything is possible.
If the democrats aren't able to pull the shenanigans they did in 2020 with shutting down counting and "discovering" hidden boxes of ballots, then Trump should win.
But, here is the money prediction. Should Harris win, as long as it is no monkeyshines, that will be it. The right will not rise up.
But, if Trump should win, get ready for the second act of the Pussy Hats and ANTIFA who will all of a sudden be reconstituted. All in the name of defending the country from fascism of course. They will create chaos and try to force Trump into invoking the insurrection act thereby proving he is a fascist.
That is why you have seen this sudden pivot to closing out the campaign with the democrats all chanting "Trump is a fascist/nazi". From a political playbook it never makes sense to go this negative and they aren't trying to sway voters. It is too late for that.
What they are trying to do is lay the groundwork for AFTER the election should Trump win.
That is my prediction. I hope for the sake of the country that I am wrong
I mean 70% of Americans support trump over Kamala, and only 30% support Kamala.I am trying to make sense of your insane claims.
Could you mean there is a 70% chance that trump will pull off a bare victory? That would be extreme, but somewhat possible point of view. That would leave a 30% of Harris winning, and more importantly a ZERO percent chance of a trump landslide.
No sane person thinks trump will win in a landslide.
When did I claim that? Where did anyone claim that? You are fighting a strawman there, you want me to have made that claim so you pretend someone did and then demand "evidence" of it.Quote anywhere that she said the election was stolen through election fraud.
We know that is what you mean. You claim to have "reputable sources" that say that.I mean 70% of Americans support trump over Kamala, and only 30% support Kamala.
Do "reputable sources" tell you about the Pyramid of Satan?this nearly comports with shame of the elitist trilateral pyramid of Satan.
the hierarchy cannot be externalized.
the pyramid would not be stable.