My election prediction

First I will say that I don't know who will win. I know I want to win. I know who I think should win. With that said.

If the polls are correct, Trump should win. If 2016 and 2020 are any clue the polls may be understating Trumps actual lead. Could the polls be wrong in favor of Trump? Of course, anything is possible.

If the democrats aren't able to pull the shenanigans they did in 2020 with shutting down counting and "discovering" hidden boxes of ballots, then Trump should win.

But, here is the money prediction. Should Harris win, as long as it is no monkeyshines, that will be it. The right will not rise up.

But, if Trump should win, get ready for the second act of the Pussy Hats and ANTIFA who will all of a sudden be reconstituted. All in the name of defending the country from fascism of course. They will create chaos and try to force Trump into invoking the insurrection act thereby proving he is a fascist.

That is why you have seen this sudden pivot to closing out the campaign with the democrats all chanting "Trump is a fascist/nazi". From a political playbook it never makes sense to go this negative and they aren't trying to sway voters. It is too late for that.

What they are trying to do is lay the groundwork for AFTER the election should Trump win.

That is my prediction. I hope for the sake of the country that I am wrong
The polls had Hillary winning, the polls had a red wave a coming....polls mean nothing. There are 325 million people in this country, polls consist of 15-2000 registered voters at best and most will say just about anything to get back to cooking or fucking their daughters when the phone rings....now with that being said....WOMEN ARE THE DOMINATE GENDER AS OF 2021 CENSUS. If Trump wins, it will be because he cheated.
 
LOL. Um... You aren't quite right on timeline there, homeslice. The conversation was about the folks who in 2016, after the election of Trump, did the "mostly peaceful" protests where they burned cop cars, threw rocks, etc. (and yes, to the folks who think these only occurred in 2017 after he took office, many of the protests were in 2016 and were about the election results (you know, Hillary believed the election was stolen... and her followers were willing to commit violence to make sure that was "corrected") and are an example of exactly what I stated, leftist political violence where they "rise up" to fight democracy).

Catch up with the conversation... Well, or you could just keep proving you are incapable of reading comprehension.
 
LOL. Um... You aren't quite right on timeline there, homeslice. The conversation was about the folks who in 2016, after the election of Trump, did the "mostly peaceful" protests where they burned cop cars, threw rocks, etc.

I don't recall those, are you lumping in the Michael Brown protests or something? Are you saying the Women's March was responsible for this?

Well, or you could just keep proving you are incapable of reading comprehension.

No need to be a bitch.
 
LOL. Geebus. You are a prime example of a Trumppissed. <SMH>

You seem extra pissy today and I think that's because you've realized that Harris is going to win and it will be because Conservatism has publicly devolved to what it had already devolved into behind the scenes...straight up Nazi bullshit.
 
Untrue, even Hillary finally agreed he won. She attended his inauguration and said he won.
And then went on and on for 7 long years about how it was stolen from her.

#notmypresident and Russian hoax continued 24/7 on Msnbc, etc.. Why do you deny that?
 
And then went on and on for 7 long years about how it was stolen from her.
She had legitimate grievances. Russia did help Trump.

#notmypresident and Russian hoax continued 24/7 on Msnbc, etc.. Why do you deny that?

If there was no collusion then how come Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort asked Konstantin Kilimnik to give confidential GOP polling data to Oleg Deripaska beginning April 2016 and extending through the fall of 2016?
 
Anyway, during that time along with protests things like a change.org petitions tried to get "faithless Electors" to vote for Hillary in states where Trump had won... You know, overturn the results... Yup... But leftists will forget this as soon as they read it, if they bother to click the link and read about it. Yeah, they tried to get electoral voters to literally vote against the results in states where the man won. (Link to a relatively left leaning story of the petition for the google inept). Hillary was talking about how it was "stolen" and folks that believed her protested, sometimes violently.
 
Why do you believe that anyone should question that they were Democrats?
Because we have no idea of their political ideology, the riots were not about a political candidate.

You are assuming they even identify with a political party.
 
Because we have no idea of their political ideology, the riots were not about a political candidate.

You are assuming they even identify with a political party.
I think you are desperate to separate yourselves from them for some reason, however, the protests against Trump and things like trying to get electors to vote for Hillary regardless of who won the election in their state, etc. were not done by folks that were, as you put it, "not about a political candidate". You are simply "conveniently misremembering". As an act of political convenience it may even convince you, but not folks who pay attention to recent history.
 
This is mine.

I also think Kansas, Iowa and Texas are going to be a lot closer than most people expect.

ggXX2.png
Florida? Really? Nobody thinks Florida is in play for the democrats
 
OK honest convo: What leads you to this result...and you can't say the public polls.
The public polls. They're all at least 5 points to the right of where they were at this time of year during the 2020 (s)election cycle.

Yes, I said that just to annoy you. But for real though, just open your eyes. I'm not sure what else to say. I can vouch for Wisconsin because I personally live here and I see the yard signs and I speak to people. I've never seen so many conservative (specifically Trump) yard signs up in Dane County before, it's unreal.

In any free and fair election, Trump would win Wisconsin by at least 5 points. I suspect the "officially reported" results to be closer than that due to election fraud, but I do suspect that Trump will win Wisconsin this time around even WITH the fraud.

That map of 312-226 is actually my conservative guess assuming a free/fair election. With fraud, that 312 mark could come down closer to a 270 mark. If it's a free/fair election and a Trump landslide ensues, then a number closer to 330 or 340 isn't out of the question. I'm not expecting that to happen by any means, but it's possible.
 
The polls had Hillary winning, the polls had a red wave a coming....polls mean nothing. There are 325 million people in this country, polls consist of 15-2000 registered voters at best and most will say just about anything to get back to cooking or fucking their daughters when the phone rings....now with that being said....WOMEN ARE THE DOMINATE GENDER AS OF 2021 CENSUS. If Trump wins, it will be because he cheated.
More likely, it will be because Biden and Harris are totally incompetent, morons whose policies and actions have pissed off nearly everyone in the US except the radical Left.
 
More likely, it will be because Biden and Harris are totally incompetent, morons whose policies and actions have pissed off nearly everyone in the US except the radical Left.
Those who have been captured by the Death Cult will do as they are told, and there is no reason to doubt that the Regimes election rigging program, which has been perfected over many years, will work again.
 
Back
Top