Muslims murdering Christians again.....

Borboletta said:
My Iraqi friend, who is a Christian, can testify to the dangers of being a non Muslim in present day Iraq. I think I told you that his brother was tied to a chair, tortured and killed in Baghdad. He tried to get him out but he was too late.
Click to expand...

I remember that. I didn't realize he was too late, though. :(
 
NOVA said:
Thanks to people like this.....

Click to expand...

Or people like this...

12547605.jpg
 
Rana said:
http://www.factcheck.org/2008/01/clinton-passed-on-killing-bin-laden/
Click to expand...

What is not in dispute at all is the fact that, in early 1996, American officials regarded Osama bin Laden as a financier of terrorism.
In August 1996, bin Laden declared war against the United States.
He issued a fatwā against the United States, which was first published in Al Quds Al Arabi, a London-based newspaper. It was entitled "Declaration of War against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places."

Clinton said, At the time, 1996, he had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America. - Bill Clinton
Click to expand...

Saying he didn't bring OBL to the US because their was no basis on which to hold him, certainly implies that the offer was made.....

President Bill Clinton, then-National Security Adviser Sandy Berger and Director of Counter terrorism, Richard Clarke among them – have testified there were no "credible offers" to hand over bin Laden.

What does no "credible offer" mean ? Plausible deniability ?= Bullshit
Then,
Lawrence Wright, flatly states that Sudan did make such an offer. Wright bases his judgment on an interview with Erwa and notes that those who most prominently deny Erwa’s claims were not in fact present for the meeting.

What possible benefit is it to Erwa to lie about this issue?....There is none.

Berger, at least, did consider the possibility of bringing bin Laden to the U.S., but, as he told The Washington Post in 2001, "The FBI did not believe we had enough evidence to indict bin Laden at that time, and therefore opposed bringing him to the United States."

Again....Saying they didn't bring OBL to the US because their was no basis on which to hold him, certainly implys that the offer was made.....

Yet, we have Berger and Clark testifying there was no offer, when they were IN FACT not
present at the meeting....

Who has to gain by lying except Clinton, Clark and Berger....

A day before Sept. 11, 2001, former President Bill Clinton told an audience that he could have had Osama bin Laden killed, but chose not to, because an attack could have endangered innocent women and children in Afghanistan.
“I nearly got him. And I could have killed him, but I would have to destroy a little town called Kandahar in Afghanistan and kill 300 innocent women and children, and then I would have been no better than him.”

December 1998, intelligence indicated that Bin Laden was staying at the governor’s residence in Kandahar, according to the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, otherwise known as the 9/11 Report, released in 2004. According to the report, the missed chance made some lower-level officials angry, but later information showed that Bin Laden had left his quarters.

“The principals’ wariness about ordering a strike appears to have been vindicated: Bin Laden left his room unexpectedly, and if a strike had been ordered he would not have been hit,” the commission wrote.
Click to expand...

Consider this....They knew OBL was staying at the governor’s residence in Kandahar, according to 0/11 Report...yet Clinton says he would have to destroy a little town called Kandahar in Afghanistan and kill 300 innocent women and children...???

Is the gov. residence the entire town of Kandahar?....If OBL wasn't in his bedroom, would
they miss him by destroying the residence...did he have to be in his bedroom to get him?

The spin and lies are obvious, the 9/11 Report was a white wash job to cover everyone's ass....
did they even mention that most of the 9/11 hi-jackers were in country by the end of 2000
before Bush entered the picture.,,,no
 
iolo said:
It will take a very long time for Muslims to murder as many Christians as the West has murdered Muslims, as we all know. Still, panic and intellectual bilge always help extreme-right scumbags.
Click to expand...

christiefan915 said:
Or people like this...

12547605.jpg
Click to expand...

I don't think he was responsible for the deaths of many Muslims, sweetie....

although with 20/20 hindsight you could make a case that the A-bombs were overkill to today,s generation....but it certainly wasn't considered that by the WWII generation....

The Japs were Imperialists, not even close to the Islamic religious maniacs of ISIS, al-Qaeda, Al-Shabaab, Ansar al-Sharia, Ansar al-Islam, the Army of Islam, Boko Haram, Egyptian Islamic Jihad, and about 20 more, where a case could be made for killing every one in those barbaric gangs with any means necessary.
 
Let's face it: The creator of Islam, the Psycho MohahahahaMAD, according to Islam's own HADITHS, PERSONALLY beheaded ~ 20 of his prisoners who rejected his Islam thus making Psycho MohahahahahaMAD the model for the ISIS TERRORIST maniacs.......so, the followers of this Psycho MohahahaMAD, i.e., the Muslimes whether directly, or indirectly, are the cause for Islamic Terrorism.

Having read the irrefutable facts above, any one STILL defending Islam, the religion created by the Psycho MohahahahahaMAD, the model for the ISIS TERRORIST maniacs, is either a f-ing muslime, or insane.
 
Raptor said:
Let's face it: The creator of Islam, the Psycho MohahahahaMAD, according to Islam's own HADITHS, PERSONALLY beheaded ~ 20 of his prisoners who rejected his Islam thus making Psycho MohahahahahaMAD the model for the ISIS TERRORIST maniacs.......so, the followers of this Psycho MohahahaMAD, i.e., the Muslimes whether directly, or indirectly, are the cause for Islamic Terrorism.

Having read the irrefutable facts above, any one STILL defending Islam, the religion created by the Psycho MohahahahahaMAD, the model for the ISIS TERRORIST maniacs, is either a f-ing muslime, or insane.
Click to expand...

I blame people for believing any religion should be used to hate, kill or deny others their rights as humans.
 
Rana said:
I blame people for believing any religion should be used to hate, kill or deny others their rights as humans.
Click to expand...

that's what most religion is about rana. It's about othering other people, and feeling happy that you are the chosen ones, while the others that piss you off will burn in hell forever.
 
christiefan915 said:
Or people like this...

12547605.jpg
Click to expand...

Is the second one Harry Truman? I thought he was more into murdering Japanese. The insane modern killings began with the overthrow of democracy in Iran, which began the drift back to the Mosque, which the regular killings of thousands and thousands is turning into a minority going in for despairing terrorism.
 
Raptor said:
Let's face it: The creator of Islam, the Psycho MohahahahaMAD, according to Islam's own HADITHS, PERSONALLY beheaded ~ 20 of his prisoners who rejected his Islam thus making Psycho MohahahahahaMAD the model for the ISIS TERRORIST maniacs.......so, the followers of this Psycho MohahahaMAD, i.e., the Muslimes whether directly, or indirectly, are the cause for Islamic Terrorism.

Having read the irrefutable facts above, any one STILL defending Islam, the religion created by the Psycho MohahahahahaMAD, the model for the ISIS TERRORIST maniacs, is either a f-ing muslime, or insane.
Click to expand...


How are you planning to eliminate the millions who totally disagree with you? Your Great Leader's methods need better railways to the death camps that we have nowadays, you know.
 
Last edited:
NOVA said:
Saying he didn't bring OBL to the US because their was no basis on which to hold him, certainly implies that the offer was made.....

President Bill Clinton, then-National Security Adviser Sandy Berger and Director of Counter terrorism, Richard Clarke among them – have testified there were no "credible offers" to hand over bin Laden.

What does no "credible offer" mean ? Plausible deniability ?= Bullshit
Then,
Lawrence Wright, flatly states that Sudan did make such an offer. Wright bases his judgment on an interview with Erwa and notes that those who most prominently deny Erwa’s claims were not in fact present for the meeting.

What possible benefit is it to Erwa to lie about this issue?....There is none.

Berger, at least, did consider the possibility of bringing bin Laden to the U.S., but, as he told The Washington Post in 2001, "The FBI did not believe we had enough evidence to indict bin Laden at that time, and therefore opposed bringing him to the United States."

Again....Saying they didn't bring OBL to the US because their was no basis on which to hold him, certainly implys that the offer was made.....

Yet, we have Berger and Clark testifying there was no offer, when they were IN FACT not
present at the meeting....

Who has to gain by lying except Clinton, Clark and Berger....



Consider this....They knew OBL was staying at the governor’s residence in Kandahar, according to 0/11 Report...yet Clinton says he would have to destroy a little town called Kandahar in Afghanistan and kill 300 innocent women and children...???

Is the gov. residence the entire town of Kandahar?....If OBL wasn't in his bedroom, would
they miss him by destroying the residence...did he have to be in his bedroom to get him?

The spin and lies are obvious, the 9/11 Report was a white wash job to cover everyone's ass....
did they even mention that most of the 9/11 hi-jackers were in country by the end of 2000
before Bush entered the picture.,,,no
Click to expand...

Nicely done Nova!
 
NOVA said:
I don't think he was responsible for the deaths of many Muslims, sweetie....

although with 20/20 hindsight you could make a case that the A-bombs were overkill to today,s generation....but it certainly wasn't considered that by the WWII generation....

The Japs were Imperialists, not even close to the Islamic religious maniacs of ISIS, al-Qaeda, Al-Shabaab, Ansar al-Sharia, Ansar al-Islam, the Army of Islam, Boko Haram, Egyptian Islamic Jihad, and about 20 more, where a case could be made for killing every one in those barbaric gangs with any means necessary.
Click to expand...

Your Albright picture was about the deaths of children... and so was mine.
 
iolo said:
How are you planning to eliminate the millions who totally disagree with you? Your Great Leaders' methods need better railways to the death camps that we have nowadays, you know.
Click to expand...

they dont even know that 20 % of the worlds population are muslim.



They just want a religious war.



war is the only thing that makes them feel alive.


for sociopaths emotions like HATE are the only ones they can feel
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top