“Multiple people hurt in shooting at Chiefs' victory parade”

[Dutch Uncle]

You're going to chafe, Sybil.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

How much attention is enough to satiate you for the day, Sybil?

 

[archives]

No license makes it harder for a nutcase to obtain a gun.

It is unconstitutional to limit it.

Blatant lie. Both Chicago and Washington DC prove it. So does Los Angeles and San Francisco in the SDTC prove it. ALL of these places try to restrict guns and have very limiting gun laws, yet they have a high rate of gun violence.

It isn't.

Committing a crime does not make you a 'good guy', Sock.

Couldn’t be any more wrong:

The Looser a State's Gun Laws, the More Mass Shootings It Has
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/research-news/5504

State gun laws, gun ownership, and mass shootings in the US
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/308...tm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=research-news

Firearm legislation and firearm-related fatalities in the United States
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/234...tm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=research-news

Where there are more guns there is more homicide
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hicrc/firearms-research/guns-and-death/

Research shows lax laws fuel violence.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...t-gun-laws-could-reduce-violence/11111232002/

What is a person who labels another a liar and then is proven using facts to be 100% wrong?

 

[Geeko Sportivo]

lets have a license for everything. license to speak. license to vote. license to procreate. sound good to you, fuckstick commie?

You are beyond reasoning, common sense, and ethics- SIMPLY FOR SOME VERY SELFISH REASONS.

So, find someone else to plead your case with.

It's not going to be me SIR!

 

[Geeko Sportivo]

I wish he would carry since he's dumb and emotional enough to pull it on camera and shoot someone.

As for an FFL dealer committing a felony when at a Gun Show, why? There are plenty of legal buyers there and, in order to maintain good relations with law enforcement, s/he would report anyone seeking to break the law.

I would say most FFL dealers are very honest. But I know to many first hand experiences where exceptions to the rule just happens in back room deals in the parking lots etc.

I knew of one man who was a gun dealer that operated under his FFL license, who ended up losing his license to deal over it, because of some of his back-room deals.

 

[Geeko Sportivo]

TRUMP!

B-B-B-Biden! B-B-B-B-But Hunter

Hypocrite!

 

[Geeko Sportivo]

Ain't no way I'm registering my guns, lizard. End of story.

I don't care what you do in your state. END OF STORY!

I seriously doubt you register your cars, trucks, and tractors there Mr. Green Jeans!

But, if you do- WHY DO YOU? BECAUSE IT IS THE LAW MAYBE?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

I would say most FFL dealers are very honest. But I know to many first hand experiences where exceptions to the rule just happens in back room deals in the parking lots etc.

I knew of one man who was a gun dealer that operated under his FFL license, who ended up losing his license to deal over it, because of some of his back-room deals.

Emphasize enforcement of the laws instead of making more oppressive laws. Criminals exist and, therefore, law enforcement is a must.

Good to see the system work. I have no sympathy for criminals, terrorists or traitors.

 

[Geeko Sportivo]

So why don't you explain this "Gunshow Loophole" you are rambling about. Every show I've been to of late requires that any gun sold MUST be sent to a licensed gun dealer with an FFL and MUST go through a background check.

Well, let's call it selling and buying guns, from and to, non licensed dealers- for short.

You do not see a loophole there that circumvents the entire Background Check process?

I thought the goal was to keep guns out of the wrong hands?

Either it is- or it is not?!

You can't have it both ways Sir!

 

[SmarterthanYou]

We know, cause God bestowed on man the right to own a gun, made it a natural right to own a gun, “life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and gun ownership”

NEXT

yes, we know you despise religion. From someone who is NOT religious, the right to own a weapon for self defense is primary. we have the natural right to self preservation using ANY weapon at our disposal. denying that right is indicative of a lack of respect for someones life.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

You are beyond reasoning, common sense, and ethics- SIMPLY FOR SOME VERY SELFISH REASONS.

So, find someone else to plead your case with.

It's not going to be me SIR!

so you really just can't justify requiring a government permission slip for things, you're basing all of this on your feels'. got it

 

[NiftyNiblick]

The federal requirements are the same, but state laws vary. Mostly, AFAIK, by waiting periods.

Maybe if you took your daughter to the range, she'd change her mind.

My daughter HAS to qualify at the range twice a year...even with her desk job at BPD.

 

[leaningright]

My daughter HAS to qualify at the range twice a year...even with her desk job at BPD.

I love qualifying days. Great excuse to burn some gun powder.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

My daughter HAS to qualify at the range twice a year...even with her desk job at BPD.

and she doesn't have a nice little gun collection?

 

[NiftyNiblick]

and she doesn't have a nice little gun collection?

Other than being co-heir to mine, I don't think so.

She has her service issue Glock which is huge and unsightly with her non-uniform office attire,
so she has her more manageable Walther PPK as well.
Probably keeps it in one of her designer shoulder bags.

I told her that if she were a respectable gun fighter, she'd wear the single action .44 mag Ruger Super Blackhawk that I've got.
She told me that she's starting to look into nursing homes for me.

 

[Geeko Sportivo]

so you really just can't justify requiring a government permission slip for things, you're basing all of this on your feels'. got it

No Sir!

I am really on your side, but you are unable to see it.

I am not trying to take your guns away stupid!

I am just trying to make sure you can still keep and carry your guns, and keep the public safer at the same time.

Because with my plan- we can do both!

So please, just stop OK!

 

[archives]

yes, we know you despise religion. From someone who is NOT religious, the right to own a weapon for self defense is primary. we have the natural right to self preservation using ANY weapon at our disposal. denying that right is indicative of a lack of respect for someones life.

Oh, so God would nave no problem with you circling your property with Claymore mines, you never know when Attila and the Huns are going to stop by

 

[Althea]

Typical white lib, lying socialist pig. Wants me to find his argument for his pansy lazy ass.
Socialist pigs fear work.

I stand by my claim. You cannot refute it, so you resort to nonsense.

Given the rampant inbreeding in your family, I guess you just aren't capable of intelligent discussion.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

No Sir!

I am really on your side, but you are unable to see it.

I am not trying to take your guns away stupid!

I am just trying to make sure you can still keep and carry your guns, and keep the public safer at the same time.

Because with my plan- we can do both!

So please, just stop OK!

no, you can't do both. criminals don't obey the gun laws. requirements that cost money infringe on lower class peoples to defend themselves. The founders had experience with government infringements on the right to bear arms, which is why they ratified 'shall not be infringe'. overcome any of that.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Oh, so God would nave no problem with you circling your property with Claymore mines, you never know when Attila and the Huns are going to stop by

I'm the last person to ask what God would want, but so are you. Unless you're trying to tell us that you think God would want you to just surrender your life in certain circumstances?