Mueller speaks at 11 am today

He had the opportunity to indict he didn't.

A good cop would follow the law and would have indicted.

"he just a guy who doesn't want to become more famous than he already is so he bails on the people"

Sorry, that's not the definition of a good cop.

Like I said, had this been President Obama, he would have indicted.

How could he indite when the Justice Dept he works for official policy fully supported by the sitting AG was that a President couldn't be indited?
 
I cant see Mueller saying anything different than what the report says....


that is...


There was lots of coordination between the Trump campaign and the Russian Government. Trump has plausible deniability.

There were 10 incidences of Obstruction, and the action to take as a result of that is up to Congress because the Justice Department has a policy against indicting a sitting president.
 
I can tell you what Mueller will not say....

He will not echo the mantra FULL and complete EXONERATION.
 
WE already know Mueller thinks swampy Bob misinterpreted the report when presenting it to the public, lets see what this "Substantial Statement" will consist of.

There was no misinterpretation. We have the report; we have Barr's conclusions. There is no inconsistency in them. Of course, if you want to point them out, let's have that debate. ;)

"crickets"

Remember when Comey reopened the investigation into Hillary a week before the election?

I do; Democrats were livid and wanted him fired. That was before he turned on Trump and they declared him a national hero. :laugh:

Hypocrite much?
 
O.K. Sean, show me how anything I posted there was a "lie," or had anything to do with Mueller's "integrity and honor," which in itself is a laugh given just a year ago your side was characterizing Mueller as a vengeful Hillary supporter out to get Trump

Next

Everything you post is a lie. ALL of your predictions are wrong. You are NEVER right. You have never been right.
 
I cant see Mueller saying anything different than what the report says....

that is...

There was lots of coordination between the Trump campaign and the Russian Government. Trump has plausible deniability.

What page is this on?

There were 10 incidences of Obstruction, and the action to take as a result of that is up to Congress because the Justice Department has a policy against indicting a sitting president. [/B]

What page was this on?
 
Last edited:
How could he indite when the Justice Dept he works for official policy fully supported by the sitting AG was that a President couldn't be indited?

If he was a good cop he would have recommended it. I guarantee a sitting Black President could be indited especially after all the dirt he found on dump. This country would be in a uproar if President Obama did just 1 of those things.

Muller gave dump a pass.
 
1) Russian intelligence officers launched a significant effort against our political system.

Rump denies this.
 
4) If we had evidence the president clearly had NOT committed a crime we would have said so.
 
3) insufficient efforts to charge a broader conspiracy on collusion.

when there is insufficient evidence then the person being investigated is INNOCENT

Innocent until proven guilty unless of course you are a republican and it is a democrat accusing you
 
6) The investigation was permitted, indictment not. A process other than indictment is necessary.
 
Back
Top